skip to main content
10.1145/2970930.2970950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Improving Proactive Decision Making with Object Trend Displays

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Operators of dynamic systems often use time-series data to support their diagnostic and proactive decision-making. Those data have traditionally been displayed in the form of separate trend charts, for example, line graphs of pressure and temperature over time. Configural object displays are a widely advocated approach to the visual integration of information yet have been applied only rarely to time-series data. One example was the 'time tunnel' format but its benefits were equivocal, seemingly compromised by its graphical complexity. There is then the need to investigate other graphical forms for object displays of time series data. This research will require a microworld representing a knowledge-rich task domain accessible to multiple participants (the nuclear power plant simulation used with the time tunnel display studies required participants to have 20 hours of experience with the system). We report a design for such a microworld that adopts the domain of financial control of a business where decisions need to be made about the pricing of products to optimize returns in a changing and sometimes volatile market. Alternative visual displays of the essential time series data for this domain are possible and whilst decision making is knowledge rich, involving reasoning about high level relationships, pilot tests showed that it is accessible to participants with only moderate training.

References

  1. Bennett, K. B., Payne, M., & Walters, B. 2005. An evaluation of a "time tunnel" display format for the presentation of temporal information. Human Factors, 47, 342--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bennett, K. B. &. Zimmerman, J. 2001. A preliminary investigation of the time tunnels display design technique Displays, 22(5), 183--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hansen, J. P. 1995. An experimental investigation of configural, digital, and temporal information on process displays. Human Factors, 37, 539--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. M. Burns, G. Skraaning, Jr., G. A. Jamieson, N. Lau, J. Kwok, R. Welch, and G. Andresen. 2008 "Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: Situation awareness effects," Human Factors, 50, 663--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mogford, R. H. 1997. Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 331--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pomerantz, J. R. 1986. Visual form perception: An overview. In H. C. Nusbaum & E. C. Schwab (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Volume 2. Visual perception, 1--30. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Spenkelink, G. P. J. 1990. Aiding the operator's anticipatory behaviour: The design of process state information. Applied Ergonomics, 21, 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wickens, C.D., Carswell, C.M. 1995. The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zhang Y, Drews F, Westenskow D, Foresti S, Agutter J, Bermudez J, Blike G, Loeb R. 2002 Effects of integrated graphical displays on situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Cogn Technol Work 4, 82--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
    September 2016
    193 pages
    ISBN:9781450342445
    DOI:10.1145/2970930

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 September 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ECCE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of37submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader