skip to main content
10.1145/2968219.2968537acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards understanding digital sharing practices in outdoor sports

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online social networks have made the sharing of personal experiences with others -- mostly in form of photos and comments -- a common activity. At the same time, an ever increasing number of dedicated sport tracking apps on our smartphones allow us to record statistical and biometric parameters from our workouts and, subsequently, share them with family, friends, and other followers. However, it is unclear if the available set of tracking parameters (such as an average speed, or calories burnt during a sports activity) is expressive enough when it comes to sharing in different sports. In our ongoing meta-study across three outdoor mountain sports, we have investigated whether those tracking apps meet the actual sharing requirements of amateur skiers, climbers, and trail runners. Ultimately, we aim to identify both universal and sport-specific needs for sharing. In this paper, we discuss our initial insights.

References

  1. Aino Ahtinen, Minna Isomursu, Ykä Huhtala, Jussi Kaasinen, Jukka Salminen, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2008. Tracking Outdoor Sports - User Experience Perspective. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 192--209. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Deborah G Ancona, Paul S Goodman, Barbara S Lawrence, and Michael L Tushman. 2001. Time: A new research lens. Academy of management Review 26, 4 (2001), 645--663.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Franco Curmi, Maria Angela Ferrario, Jen Southern, and Jon Whittle. 2013. HeartLink: Open Broadcast of Live Biometric Data to Social Networks (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1749--1758. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466231 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anton Fedosov and Marc Langheinrich. 2015. From Start to Finish: Understanding Group Sharing Behavior in a Backcountry Skiing Community. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct - MobileHCI '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 758--765. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2793698 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Raine Kajastila and Perttu Hämäläinen. 2014. Benefits of 3D topos for information sharing and planning in rock climbing. Sports Technology (oct 2014). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19346182.2014.968249?journalCode=rtec20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, Tanzeem Choudhury, Richard Beckwith, and Jeffrey Hightower. 2009. Exploring Privacy Concerns about Personal Sensing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 176--183. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kristina Knaving, Paweł Wolniak, Morten Fjeld, and Staffan Björk. 2015. Flow is Not Enough: Understanding the Needs of Advanced Amateur Runners to Design Motivation Technology. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2013--2022. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702542 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ioannis Krontiris, Marc Langheinrich, and Katie Shilton. 2014. Trust and privacy in mobile experience sharing: future challenges and avenues for research. IEEE Communications Magazine 52, 8 (aug 2014), 50--55. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2014.6871669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Michahelles and B. Schiele. 2005. Sensing and monitoring professional skiers. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4, 3 (July 2005), 40--45. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2005.66 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Florian Mueller, Frank Vetere, Martin R Gibbs, Darren Edge, Stefan Agamanolis, and Jennifer G Sheridan. 2010. Jogging over a Distance Between Europe and Australia. In Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 189--198. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866062 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sean Munson and Sunny Consolvo. 2012. Exploring Goal-setting, Rewards, Self-monitoring, and Sharing to Motivate Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE, 25--32. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jarno Ojala. 2013. Personal content in online sports communities: motivations to capture and share personal exercise data. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing 14 2, 1-2 (2013), 68--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Aarathi Prasad, Jacob Sorber, Timothy Stablein, Denise Anthony, and David Kotz. 2012. Understanding sharing preferences and behavior for mHealth devices. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society - WPES '12 (WPES '12). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 117. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2381966.2381983 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Andrew Raij, Animikh Ghosh, Santosh Kumar, and Mani Srivastava. 2011. Privacy Risks Emerging from the Adoption of Innocuous Wearable Sensors in the Mobile Environment (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978945 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tammy Toscos, Anne Faber, Shunying An, and Mona Praful Gandhi. 2006. Chick Clique: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Teenage Girls to Exercise. In CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '06 (CHI EA '06). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1873. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125805 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards understanding digital sharing practices in outdoor sports

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct
      September 2016
      1807 pages
      ISBN:9781450344623
      DOI:10.1145/2968219

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader