skip to main content
10.1145/2968220.2968223acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting Collaborative Political Decision Making: An Interactive Policy Process Visualization System

Published:24 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The process of political decision making is often complex and tedious. The policy process consists of multiple steps, most of them are highly iterative. In addition, different stakeholder groups are involved in political decision making and contribute to the process. A series of textual documents accompanies the process. Examples are official documents, discussions, scientific reports, external reviews, newspaper articles, or economic white papers. Experts from the political domain report that this plethora of textual documents often exceeds their ability to keep track of the entire policy process. We present PolicyLine, a visualization system that supports different stakeholder groups in overview-and-detail tasks for large sets of textual documents in the political decision making process. In a longitudinal design study conducted together with domain experts in political decision making, we identified missing analytical functionality on the basis of a problem and domain characterization. In an iterative design phase, we created PolicyLine in close collaboration with the domain experts. Finally, we present the results of three evaluation rounds, and reflect on our collaborative visualization system.

References

  1. W. Aigner, S. Miksch, H. Schumann, and C. Tominski. Visualization of Time-Oriented Data. Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Verlag, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. W. Aigner, S. Miksch, B. Thurnher, and S. Biffl. Planninglines: Novel glyphs for representing temporal uncertainties and their evaluation. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Info. Vis. (IV), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Assogba, I. Ros, J. DiMicco, and M. McKeon. Many bills: engaging citizens through visualizations of congressional legislation. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Curtotti and E. McCreath. Enhancing the visualization of law. In Law via the Internet Twentieth Anniversary Conference, Cornell University, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European Union. Eur-lex - access to european union law. http://eur-lex.europa.eu, accessed 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. A. Fox, D. Hix, L. T. Nowell, D. J. Brueni, D. Rao, W. C. Wake, and L. S. Heath. Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library. American Society for Information Science, 44(8), 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Havre, E. Hetzler, P. Whitney, and L. Nowell. Themeriver: Visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE TVCG, 8(1), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. A. Hearst. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Herrmannova and P. Knoth. Visual search for supporting content exploration in large document collections. D-Lib Magazine, 18(7/8), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Kohlhammer, K. Nazemi, T. Ruppert, and D. Burkhardt. Toward visualization in policy modeling. IEEE CG&A, 32(5), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Lam, D. Russell, D. Tang, and T. Munzner. Session viewer: Visual exploratory analysis of web session logs. In IEEE VAST, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Macintosh. Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process. In Promise and Problems of E-democracy. OECD, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Munzner. A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE TVCG, 15(6), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Nocaj and U. Brandes. Organizing search results with a reference map. IEEE TVCG, 18(12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Riehmann, M. Hanfler, and B. Froehlich. Interactive sankey diagrams. In IEEE INFOVIS, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Rind, T. D. Wang, W. Aigner, S. Miksch, K. Wongsuphasawat, C. Plaisant, and B. Shneiderman. Interactive information visualization to explore and query electronic health records. Foundations and Trends in HCI, 5(3), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Ruppert, J. Bernard, and J. Kohlhammer. Bridging knowledge gaps in policy analysis with information visualization. In EGOV/ePart, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE TVCG, 18(12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. Smith, M. Czerwinski, B. Meyers, D. Robbins, G. Robertson, and D. Tan. Facetmap: A scalable search and browse visualization. IEEE TVCG, 12(5), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. J. van Wijk. Evaluation: A challenge for visual analytics. Computer, 46(7), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. Wang, C. Plaisant, B. Shneiderman, N. Spring, D. Roseman, G. Marchand, V. Mukherjee, and M. Smith. Temporal summaries: Supporting temporal categorical searching, aggregation and comparison. IEEE TVCG, 15(6), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Ware. Information visualization: perception for design. Elsevier, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Wei, S. Liu, Y. Song, S. Pan, M. X. Zhou, W. Qian, L. Shi, L. Tan, and Q. Zhang. Tiara: A visual exploratory text analytic system. In SIGKDD Conf. on KDD (KDD). ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. K. Wongsuphasawat, J. A. Guerra Gómez, C. Plaisant, T. D. Wang, M. Taieb-Maimon, and B. Shneiderman. Lifeflow: Visualizing an overview of event sequences. In SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Collaborative Political Decision Making: An Interactive Policy Process Visualization System

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          VINCI '16: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
          September 2016
          173 pages
          ISBN:9781450341493
          DOI:10.1145/2968220

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 September 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          VINCI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader