skip to main content
10.1145/2966986.2967018guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Control-fluidic codesign for paper-based digital microfluidic biochips

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Paper-based digital microfluidic biochips (P-DMFBs) have recently emerged as a promising low-cost and fast-responsive platform for biochemical assays. In P-DMFBs, electrodes and control lines are printed on a piece of photo paper using inkjet printer and conductive ink of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Compared with traditional digital microfluidic biochips (DMFBs), P-DMFBs enjoy notable advantages, such as faster in-place fabrication with printer and ink, lower costs, better disposability, etc. Because electrodes and CNT control lines are printed on the same side of a paper, a new design challenge for P-DMFB is to prevent the interference between moving droplets and the voltages on CNT control lines. These interactions may result in unexpected droplet movements and thus incorrect assay outputs. To address the new challenges in automated design of P-DMFBs, this paper proposes the first control-fluidic codesign flow, which simultaneously adjusts the control line routing and fluidic droplet scheduling to achieve an optimized solution. As the control line routing may not be able to address all the interferences between moving droplets and the voltages on control lines, droplet rescheduling is performed to effectively deal with the remaining interferences in the routing solution. Computational simulation results on real-life bioassays show that the proposed codesign method successfully eliminates all the interferences, while a state-of-the-art maze routing method cannot solve any of the benchmarks without conflicts.

References

  1. [1].Ko H., Lee J., Kim Y., Lee B., Jung C.-H., Choi J.-H., Kwon O.-S., and Shin K., “Active Digital Microfluidic Paper Chips with Inkjet-Printed Patterned Electrodes”. Adv. Mater., 2014, vol. 26, pp. 23352340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2].Srinivasan V., Pamula V. K., Paik P., and Fair R. B., “Protein Stamping for MALDI Mass Spectrometry Using an Electrowetting-based Microfluidic Platform”, Optics East, 2004, vol. 5591, pp. 2632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3].Pollack M. G., Fair R. B., and Shenderov A. D., “Electrowetting-Based Actuation of Liquid Droplets for Microfluidic Applications”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2000, vol. 77, pp. 1725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4].Moon H., Cho S. K., Garrell R. L., and Kim C.-J., “Low Voltage Electrowetting-on-Dielectric”, J. Appl. Phys., 2002, vol. 92, pp. 40804087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5].Yi U.C. and Kim C.-J., “Characterization of Electrowetting Actuation on Addressable Single-Side Coplanar Electrodes”, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2006, vol. 16, pp. 20532059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6].Abdelgawad M., Ferire S., Yang H., and Wheeler A. R., “All-Terrain Droplet Actuation”, Lab Chip, 2008, vol. 8, pp. 672677.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7]. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5FxNLYyCf41SmRfeDZLUHR3em8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8].Ho T.-Y.K. Chakrabarty , and Pop P., “Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Recent Research and Emerging Challenges,” Proc. of InternationalConference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS), 2011, pp. 335343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9].Su F. and Chakrabarty K., “Architectural-Level Synthesis of Digital Microfluidics-Based Biochips,” Proc. ICCAD, 2004, pp. 223228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10].Su F. and Chakrabarty K., “Unified High-Level Synthesis and Module Placement for Defect-Tolerant Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. DAC, 2005, pp. 825830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11].Grissom D., O'Neal K., Preciado B. et al., “A Digital Microfluidic Biochip Synthesis Framework,” Proc. VLSI-SoC, 2012, pp. 177182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12].Yuh P.-H. Yang C.-L., and Chang Y.-W., “Placement of Defect-Tolerant Digital Microfluidic Biochips Using the T-Tree Formulation,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC), 2007, vol. 3, no. 3, Artical No. 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13].Su F., Hwang W., and Chakrabarty K., “Droplet Routing in the Synthesis of Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. DATE, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14].Xu T. and Chakrabarty K., “Integrated Droplet Routing in the Synthesis of Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. DAC, 2007, pp. 948953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15].Cho M. and Pan D. Z., “A High-Performance Droplet Routing Algorithm for Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, 2008, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 17141724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16].Yuh P.-H. Yang C.-L., and Chang Y.-W., “BioRoute: A Network-Flow-Based Routing Algorithm for the Synthesis of Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, 2008, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 19281941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17].Huang T.-W. and Ho T.-Y., “A Two-Stage Integer Linear Programming-Based Droplet Routing Algorithm for Pin-Constrained Digital Microfluidic BiochiDS,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, 2011 vol. 30, no. 2, pp, 215228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18].Xiao Z. and Young E. F. Y., “CrossRouter: A Droplet Router for Cross-Referencing Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. ASP-DAC, 2010, pp. 269274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19].Xu T. and Chakrabarty K., “Broadcast Electrode-Addressing for Pin-Constrained Multi-Functional Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. DAC, 2008, pp. 173178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20].Huang T.-W. Yeh S.-Y., and Ho T.-Y., “A Network-Flow Based Pin-Count Aware Routing Algorithm for Broadcast-Addressing EWOD Chips,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2011, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 17861799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21].Huang T.-W. Ho Y., and Chakrabarty K., “Reliability-Oriented Broadcast Electrode-Addressing for Pin-Constrained Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. ICCAD, 2011, pp. 448455.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22].Yeh S.-H.-W. Chang T.-W. Huang , and Ho T.-Y., “Voltage-Aware Chip-Level Design for Reliability-Driven Pin-Constrained EWOD Chips,” Proc. ICCAD, 2012, pp. 353360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23].Liu C.-H. Chang H.-M. Chen , and Ho T.-Y., “ACER: An Agglomerative Clustering Based Electrode Addressing and Routing Algorithm for Pin-Constrained EWOD Chips,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, 2014, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 13161327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24].Wang Q., He W., Yao H., Ho T.-Y., and Cai Y., “SVM-Based Routability-Driven Chip-Level Design for Voltage-Aware Pin-Constrained EWOD Chips,” Proc. ISPD, 2015, pp. 4956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25].Li J. D., Wang S. J., Li K. S. M., and Ho T. Y., “Congestion- and Timing-Driven Droplet Routing for Pin-Constrained Paper-Based Microfluidic Biochips,” Proc. ASP-DAC, 2016, pp. 593598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26].Su F., Hwang W., and Chakrabarty K., “Droplet routing in the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips,” Proc. DATE, 2006, pp. 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27].Wang Q., Shen Y., Yao H., Ho T.-Y., and Cai Y., “Practical Functional and Washing Droplet Routing for Cross-Contamination Avoidance in Digital Microfluidic Biochips” Proc. DAC, 2014, pp. 143:1143:6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28].Grissom D. and Brisk P., “Fast Online Synthesis of Digital Microfluidic Biochips,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2014, pp. 356369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29].Xiang H., Tang X. P., and Wong M. D. F., “Min-Cost Flow-Based Algorithm for Simultaneous Pin Assignment and Routing,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, 2003, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 870878.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30].Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., and Orlin J. B., Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, Prentice Hall, 1993, p. 318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31].Gurobi Optimizer. http://www.gurobi.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Control-fluidic codesign for paper-based digital microfluidic biochips
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image Guide Proceedings
            2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
            Nov 2016
            946 pages

            Copyright © 2016

            Publisher

            IEEE Press

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 November 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Qualifiers

            • research-article