skip to main content
review-article
Free Access

Mathematical foundations for social computing

Published:01 December 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Social computing benefits from mathematical foundations, but research has barely scratched the surface.

References

  1. Abernethy, J., Chen, Y. and Vaughan, J.W. Efficient market making via convex optimization, and a connection to online learning. ACM Trans. Economics and Computation 1, 2 (2013), Article 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abernethy, J., Frongillo, R., Li, X. and Vaughan, J.W. A general volume-parameterized market-making framework. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barowy, D., Curtsinger, C., Berger, E.D. and McGregor, A. Automan: A platform for integrating human-based and digital computation. In Proceedings of the Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J. and Procaccia, J.D., Eds. Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Fortnow, L., Lambert, N., Pennock, D. and Wortman, J. Complexity of combinatorial market makers. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Coleman, J. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta, A. and Ghosh, A. Crowdsourced judgement elicitation with endogenous proficiency. In Proceedings of the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. de Clippel, G., Moulin, H. and Tideman, N. Impartial division of a dollar. J. Economic Theory 139, 1 (2008), 176--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dudik, M., Lahaie, S. and Pennock, D.M. A tractable combinatorial market maker using constraint generation. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dudik, M., Lahaie, S. and Pennock, D.M and Rothschild, D. A combinatorial prediction market for the U.S. elections. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dwork, C. and Roth, A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 9, 34 (2014), 211--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Easley, D. and Ghosh, A. Incentives, gamification, and game theory: An economic approach to badge design. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Easley, D. and Ghosh, A. Behavioral mechanism design: Optimal crowdsourcing contracts and prospect theory. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ghosh, A. Game theory and incentives in human computation. Handbook of Human Computation. P. Michelucci, ed. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosh, A. and Hummel, P. A game-theoretic analysis of rank-order mechanisms for user-generated content. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ghosh, A. and Kleinberg, R. Behavioral mechanism design: Optimal contests for simple agents. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ghosh, A. and McAfee, P. Incentivizing high-quality user generated content. In Proceedings of the 22th International World Wide Web Conference, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ghosh, A. and McAfee, P. Crowdsourcing with endogenous entry. In Proceedings of the 21st International World Wide Web Conference, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Giles, J. Computational social science: Making the links. Nature 488, 7412 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A.E. Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. American Statistical Association 102, 477 (2007), 359--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Goel, A., Krishnaswamy, A., Sakshuwong, S. and Aitamurto, T. Knapsack voting. Collective Intelligence, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldman, J. and Procaccia, A.D. Spliddit: Unleashing fair division algorithms. SIGecom Exchanges 13, 2 (2014), 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hanson, R. Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 1 (2003), 105--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ho, C.-J. and Vaughan, J.W. Online task assignment in crowdsourcing markets. In Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ho, C.-J., Jabbari, S. and Vaughan, J.W. Adaptive task assignment for crowdsourced classification. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ho, C.-J., Slivkins, A., Suri, S. and Vaughan, J.W. Incentivizing high quality crowdwork. In Proceedings of the 24th International World Wide Web Conference, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Immorlica, N., Stoddard, G. and Syrgkanis, V. Social status and badge design. In Proceedings of the 24th International World Wide Web Conference, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jain, S. and Parkes, D.C. A game-theoretic analysis of the ESP Game. ACM Trans. Economics and Computation 1, 1 (2013), 3:1--3:35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jain, S., Chen, Y. and Parkes, D.C. Designing incentives for online question-and-answer forums. Games and Economic Behavior 86 (2014), 458--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Karger, D., Oh, S. and Shah, D. Iterative learning for reliable crowdsourcing systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kearns, M. Experiments in social computation. Commun. ACM 55, 10 (Oct. 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kurokawa, D., Procaccia, A.D. and Shah, N. Leximin allocations in the real world. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lambert, N.S., Langford, J., Vaughan, J.W., Chen, Y., Reeves, D., Shoham, Y. and Pennock, D.M. An axiomatic characterization of wagering mechanisms. J. Economic Theory 156 (2015), 389--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lazer, D. et al. Computational social science. Science 323, 5915 (2009), 721--723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mason, W. and Watts, D. Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds." In Proceedings of the First Human Computation Workshop, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Procaccia, A.D. Cake cutting: Not just child's play. Commun. ACM 56, 7 (July 2013), 78--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Slivkins, A. and Vaughan, J.W. Online decision making in crowdsourcing markets: Theoretical challenges. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 12, 2 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ungar, L., Mellors, B., Satopää, V., Baron, J., Tetlock, P., Ramos, J. and Swift, S. The good judgment project: A large-scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions. AAAI Technical Report FS-12-06, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Waggoner, B. and Chen, Y. Output agreement mechanisms and common knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2nd AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yin, M., Chen, Y. and Sun, Y.-A. The effects of performance-contingent financial incentives in online labor markets. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mathematical foundations for social computing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 59, Issue 12
          December 2016
          119 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/3022085
          • Editor:
          • Moshe Y. Vardi
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 December 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • review-article
          • Popular
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format