skip to main content
10.1145/2959100.2959171acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access
Best Short Paper

Adaptive, Personalized Diversity for Visual Discovery

Published:07 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search queries are appropriate when users have explicit intent, but they perform poorly when the intent is difficult to express or if the user is simply looking to be inspired. Visual browsing systems allow e-commerce platforms to address these scenarios while offering the user an engaging shopping experience. Here we explore extensions in the direction of adaptive personalization and item diversification within Stream, a new form of visual browsing and discovery by Amazon. Our system presents the user with a diverse set of interesting items while adapting to user interactions. Our solution consists of three components (1) a Bayesian regression model for scoring the relevance of items while leveraging uncertainty, (2) a submodular diversification framework that re-ranks the top scoring items based on category, and (3) personalized category preferences learned from the user's behavior. When tested on live traffic, our algorithms show a strong lift in click-through-rate and session duration.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p35.mp4

mp4

568.8 MB

References

  1. R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying search results. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 5--14. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Ahmed, C. H. Teo, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, and A. Smola. Fair and balanced: Learning to present news stories. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 333--342. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Auer. Using confidence bounds for exploitation-exploration trade-offs. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:397--422, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. O. Chapelle and L. Li. An empirical evaluation of thompson sampling. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2249--2257, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. El-Arini, G. Veda, D. Shahaf, and C. Guestrin. Turning down the noise in the blogosphere. In Proceedings of SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 289--298, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Fujishige. Submodular functions and optimization, volume 58. Elsevier, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Graepel, J. Q. Candela, T. Borchert, and R. Herbrich. Web-scale bayesian click-through rate prediction for sponsored search advertising in microsoft's bing search engine. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 13--20, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Leskovec, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, C. Faloutsos, J. VanBriesen, and N. Glance. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 420--429. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Low, D. Agarwal, and A. J. Smola. Multiple domain user personalization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 123--131. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey, and M. L. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions i. Mathematical Programming, 14(1):265--294, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. R. Thompson. On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples. Biometrika, pages 285--294, 1933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Yue and C. Guestrin. Linear submodular bandits and their application to diversified retrieval. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 2483--2491, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive, Personalized Diversity for Visual Discovery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader