Kerk F. Kee
ABSTRACT
As the computational movement gains more traction in the scientific community, there is an increasing need to understand what drives adoption and diffusion of tools. This investigation reveals what makes a computational tool more easily adopted by users within the e-science community. Guided by Rogers's [1] Diffusion of Innovations theory, we set out to identify the innovation attributes of a range of computational tools across domains. Based on 135 interviews with domain scientists, computational technologists, and supercomputer center administrators across the U.S. and a small portion from Europe, systematic analysis revealed 10 key attributes of tools. They are: driven by needs, organized access, trialability, observability, relative advantage, simplicity, compatibility, community-driven, well-documented, and adaptability. We discuss the attributes in the form of questions stakeholders should keep in mind while designing and promoting the tools. We also present diffusion strategies associated with each attribute. The 10 attributes and associated questions can serve as a checklist for e-science projects that aim to promote their computation tools beyond the incubators. This paper is submitted to the "Software and Software Environments" track because it has implications for engagement of user communities.
- Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press, NY.Google Scholar
- Freeman, P. A. 2007. Is 'designing' cyberinfrastructure -- or, even, defining it -- possible? First Monday 12 (Jun. 2007), http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1900/1782.Google Scholar
- Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., ... Wright, M. 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved December 19, 2006 from http://www.communitytechnology.org/nsf_ci_report/.Google Scholar
- NSF. 2009. From supercomputing to the TeraGrid Retrieved October 5, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/cyber/fromsctotg.jspGoogle Scholar
- Markoff, J. 1997. U.S. to support fewer supercomputer centers. The New York Times on the Web, from http://partners.nytimes.com/library/cyber/week/033197super.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Kahin, B. and Jackson, S. J. 2007. Preface. First Monday, 12, (Jun. 2007), http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1865/1748.Google Scholar
- Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., ... Wolff, S. (2009). A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39 (Nov. 2009), 22--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Comer, D. 1983. The computer science research network CSNET: A history and status report. Communications of the ACM, 26 (Oct. 2983), 747--753. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennings, D. M., Landweber, L. H., Fuchs, I. H., Farber, D. J., and Adrion, W. R. 1986. Computer networking for scientists. Science, 231 (Feb. 1986), 943--950.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Avery, P. 2007. Open science grid: Building and sustaining general cyberinfrastructure using a collaborative approach. First Monday, 12, (June 2007), http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1866/1749.Google Scholar
- Seidel, E., Muñoz, J., Meacham, S., and Whitson, C. A. 2009. A vision for cyberinfrastructure. Computer, 42 (Jan. 2009), 40.Google Scholar
- NSF. 2012. National Science Foundation realignment plans, from http://nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=125381Google Scholar
- Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., and Williams, R. 2009. Introduction: An agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10 (May 2009), 364--374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kee, K. F., and Browning, L. D. 2010. The dialectical tensions in the funding infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19 (Aug. 2010), 283--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stewart, C. 2007. Indiana University cyberinfrastructure newsletter. Retrieved November 1, 2008, from http://racinfo.indiana.edu/newsletter/archives/2007-03.shtmlGoogle Scholar
- Kee, K. F., Cradduck, L., Blodgett, B., and Olwan, R. 2011. Cyberinfrastructure inside out: Definitions and influences shaping its emergence, development, and implementation In D. Araya, Y. Breindl & T. Houghton (Eds.), Nexus: New intersections in Internet research. (pp. 157--189). Peter Lang, NY.Google Scholar
- Kee, K. F. in press. Adoption and diffusion. In C. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
- Rice, R. E. 2009. Diffusion of innovations: Theoretical extensions. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of media effects. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Bazeley, P., and Jackson, K. 2013. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (Mar. 1990), 3--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tarde, G. 1903. The laws of imitation. Henry Holt and Company, NY.Google Scholar
- Owen, W. F. Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McAfee, A. 2009. Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization's toughest challenges. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Shirky, C. 2009. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin, NY.Google Scholar
- Kuchner, M. J. 2012. Marketing for scientists: how to shine in tough times. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Understanding The Key Attributes for a Successful Innovation Culture
This paper presents the results and findings of a research project on innovation culture in Australian information technology sector organisations. The primary objective of this study was to establish the determinants of a successful enterprise ...
Lifestyles, innovation attributes, and teachers' adoption of game-based learning
The purpose of this study was to understand the factors that affected teachers' adoption of game-based learning (GBL). In particular, this study paid special attention to the non-adopters who did not have any intentions to adopt GBL in the future and ...
Empirical Study of Perceived Innovation Attributes and Innovative Adoption Intention: A Mediating Effect of Attitude
ICEE '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-GovernmentInnovation attributes are not only the most important characteristics of the innovative products, but also have the major impact on the adoption speed. In this study, attitude is taken as the mediating variable, and the innovation attributes of product ...
Comments