skip to main content
10.1145/2934328.2934333acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding solar PV and battery adoption in Ontario: an agent-based approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The adoption of solar photovoltaic panels and batteries greatly reduces a grid customer's carbon footprint, while simultaneously reducing their dependency on conventional electricity supply. Given the significance of both outcomes, it is important to understand the potential effect of energy policies on the adoption of these 'PV-battery systems' before they are actually implemented. We therefore design and implement an Agent-Based Model (ABM) that captures the purchase and usage of PV-battery systems. Focusing on Ontario, we use a survey to elicit the responsiveness of residents to potential energy policies. We parameterize the ABM based on survey results to forecast the relative performance of different energy policies. We find that PV-battery system adoption in Ontario is likely to be incremental rather than exponential. Moreover, we find that, of all the policies we evaluated, the most effective way to improve PV-battery system adoption is to significantly reduce its price.

References

  1. Adedamola Adepetu, Elnaz Rezaei, Daniel Lizotte, and Srinivasan Keshav. Critiquing time-of-use pricing in ontario. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 223--228. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Frank M Bass. Comments on âăija new product growth for model consumer durables the bass modelâĂİ. Management science, 50(12 supplement): 1833--1840, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Crowdflower Inc. Crowdflower | Make Your Data Useful. Accessed on 12 February 2016, at http://www.crowdflower.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley Efron, Trevor Hastie, Iain Johnstone, Robert Tibshirani, et al. Least angle regression. The Annals of statistics, 32(2): 407--499, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David Feldman, Galen Barbose, Robert Margolis, Ted James, Samantha Weaver, Darghouth Naïm, Ran Fu, Carolyn Davidson, Sam Booth, and Ryan Wiser. Photovoltaic System Pricing Trends. Accessed on 09 November 2015, at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Finance Formulas. Discounted Payback Period. Accessed on 10 October 2015, at http://www.sunsmart.solar/ontario-microfit/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Garrett Fitzgerald, James Mandel, Jesse Morris, and Hervé Touati. The Economics of Battery Energy Storage: How multi-use, customer-sited batteries deliver the most services and value to customers and the grid. Technical report, Rocky Mountain Institute, September 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Srinivasan Keshav, and Catherine Rosenberg. Toward a realistic performance analysis of storage systems in smart grids. Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, 6(1): 402--410, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mark Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6): 1420--1443, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Marcello Graziano and Kenneth Gillingham. Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: the influence of neighbors and the built environment. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4): 815--839, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. David R Heise. Expressive Order. Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Valerio Iachini, Andrea Borghesi, and Michela Milano. Agent based simulation of incentive mechanisms on photovoltaic adoption. In AI* IA 2015, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pages 136--148. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Independent Electricity System Operator. Solar photovoltaic. Accessed on 10 October 2015, at http://microfit.powerauthority.on.ca/solar-photovoltaic-pv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Independent Electricity System Operator. FIT Program Pricing. Accessed on 26 January 2016, at http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/fit-program/fit-program-pricing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Independent Electricity System Operator. Progress Report on Contracted Electricity Supply. Accessed on 07 December 2015, at http://www.ieso.ca/Documents/Supply/Progress-Report-Contracted-Supply-Q12015.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patrick Jochem. Including road transport into the eu-ets? Karlsruhe, Germany: Institute for Economic Policy at University of Karlsruhe, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Songpol Kulviwat, Gordon C Bruner, and Obaid Al-Shuridah. The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(7): 706--712, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Charles M Macal and Michael J North. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4(3): 151--162, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tomoyuki Murakami. Agent-based simulations of the influence of social policy and neighboring communication on the adoption of grid-connected photovoltaics. Energy Conversion and Management, 80: 158--164, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. System Advisor Model (SAM). Accessed on 11 February 2016, at https://sam.nrel.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Igor Nikolic and Amineh Ghorbani. A method for developing agent-based models of socio-technical systems. In Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 44--49. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ontario Energy Board. Electricity Prices. Accessed on 10 October 2015, at http://www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/OEB/Consumers/Electricity/Electricity+Prices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ontario Energy Board. Historical Electricity Prices. Accessed on 09 November 2015, at http://www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/OEB/Consumers/Electricity/Electricity+Prices/Historical+Electricity+Prices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J Palmer, G Sorda, and R Madlener. Modeling the diffusion of residential photovoltaic systems in italy: An agent-based simulation {r}. aachen: Rwth aachen university. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkinson, Giles. Solar PV costs to fall another 25 per cent in three years. Accessed on 09 November 2015, at http://reneweconomy.com.au/2015/solarpv-costs-to-fall-another-25-per-cent-in-three-years-32854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Riccio, Karen. Lithium-ion Battery Prices Expected to Plunge 60 Percent by 2020. Accessed on 09 November 2015, at http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2015/08/31/lithium-ion-battery-prices-expected-plunge-60-percent-2020/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott A Robinson, Matt Stringer, Varun Rai, and Abhishek Tondon. Gis-integrated agent-based model of residential solar pv diffusion. In 32nd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, pages 28--31, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tobias Schröder. A model of language-based impression formation and attribution among germans. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shahan, Zachary. Tesla Powerwall & Powerpacks Per-kWh Lifetime Prices vs Aquion Energy, Eos Energy, & Imergy. Accessed on 11 February 2016, at http://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/09/tesla-powerwall-powerblocks-per-kwhlifetime-prices-vs-aquion-energy-eosenergy-imergy/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shahan, Zachary. Tesla Powerwall Price vs Battery Storage Competitor Prices (Residential & Utility-Scale). Accessed on 26 January 2016, at http://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/07/tesla-powerwall-price-vs-battery-storage-competitor-prices-residential-utility-scale/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Daniel B Shank. An affect control theory of technology. Current Research in Social Psychology, 15(10), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. SunSmart Solar. Ontario Feed-In Tariff, MicroFIT and FIT Program Installation. Accessed on 11 January 2016, at http://www.financeformulas.net/Discounted-Payback-Period.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Upadhyay, Anand. Tesla's Powerwall & Battery Costs Disruption. Accessed on 26 January 2016, at http://solarlove.org/teslas-powerwall-battery-costs-disruption/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Koen H van Dam, Igor Nikolic, and Zofia Lukszo. Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems, volume 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Koen Haziël Van Dam. Capturing socio-technical systems with agent-based modelling. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Vorrath, Sophie. Energy storage 'megashift' ahead, battery costs set to fall 60% by 2020. Accessed on 09 November 2015, at http://reneweconomy.com.au/2015/energy-storage-megashift-ahead-battery-costs-set-to-fall-60-by-2020-2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Di Wang, Chuangang Ren, Anand Sivasubramaniam, Bhuvan Urgaonkar, and Hosam Fathy. Energy storage in datacenters: What, where, and how much? SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 40(1): 187--198, June 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Harry Wirth and Karin Schneider. Recent facts about photovoltaics in germany. Report from Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Germany, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Haifeng Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Joshua Letchford, and Kiran Lakkaraju. Predicting rooftop solar adoption using agent-based modeling. In 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Haifeng Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Joshua Letchford, and Kiran Lakkaraju. Data-driven agent-based modeling, with application to rooftop solar adoption. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 513--521. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jiayun Zhao, Esfandyar Mazhari, Nurcin Celik, and Young-Jun Son. Hybrid agent-based simulation for policy evaluation of solar power generation systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(10): 2189--2205, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    e-Energy '16: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    June 2016
    266 pages
    ISBN:9781450343930
    DOI:10.1145/2934328

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader