skip to main content
10.1145/2911451.2911452acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where the Event Lies: Predicting Event Occurrence in Textual Documents

Published:07 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Manually inspecting text in a document collection to assess whether an event occurs in it is a cumbersome task. Although a manual inspection can allow one to identify and discard false events, it becomes infeasible with increasing numbers of automatically detected events. In this paper, we present a system to automatize event validation, defined as the task of determining whether a given event occurs in a given document or corpus. In addition to supporting users seeking for information that corroborates a given event, event validation can also boost the precision of automatically detected event sets by discarding false events and preserving the true ones. The system allows to specify events, retrieves candidate web documents, and assesses whether events occur in them. The validation results are shown to the user, who can revise the decision of the system. The validation method relies on a supervised model to predict the occurrence of events in a non-annotated corpus. This system can also be used to build ground-truths for event corpora.

References

  1. J. Allan, R. Papka, and V. Lavrenko. On-line new event detection and tracking. In SIGIR, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Araki and J. Callan. An annotation similarity model in passage ranking for historical fact validation. In SIGIR, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Ceroni and M. Fisichella. Towards an entity-based automatic event validation. In ECIR, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Ceroni, U. Gadiraju, and M. Fisichella. Improving event detection by automatically assessing validity of event occurrence in text. In CIKM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Das Sarma, A. Jain, and C. Yu. Dynamic relationship and event discovery. In Proc. of WSDM '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Q. He, K. Chang, and E.-P. Lim. Analyzing feature trajectories for event detection. In Proc. of SIGIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Kuzey and G. Weikum. Evin: Building a knowledge base of events. In Proc. of WWW '14, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. J. McMinn, Y. Moshfeghi, and J. M. Jose. Building a large-scale corpus for evaluating event detection on twitter. In CIKM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. J. McMinn, D. Tsvetkov, T. Yordanov, A. Patterson, R. Szk, J. A. Rodriguez Perez, and J. M. Jose. An interactive interface for visualizing events on twitter. In Proc. of SIGIR '14, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Milicic, G. Rizzo, J. L. Redondo Garcia, R. Troncy, and T. Steiner. Live topic generation from event streams. In WWW '13, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Mishra and K. Berberich. ExposÉ: Exploring past news for seminal events. In Proc. of WWW '15, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. B. Vuurens, A. P. de Vries, R. Blanco, and P. Mika. Online news tracking for ad-hoc queries. In Proc. of SIGIR '15, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Where the Event Lies: Predicting Event Occurrence in Textual Documents

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        July 2016
        1296 pages
        ISBN:9781450340694
        DOI:10.1145/2911451

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate62of341submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader