Ogma: A Virtual Reality Language Acquisition System

ABSTRACT

One of the traditional methods of learning a new language, or Second-Language Acquisition (SLA), is immersion, seen today as one of the most effective learning methods. Using this method, the learner relocates to a new place where the target language is the dominant language, and tries to learn the language my immersing themselves in the local environment. One of the disadvantages of this method is that relocating to a new place is not always a viable option. That's where Virtual Reality (VR) can come to our rescue. VR is an immersive technology that allows the user to wear a head-mounted display to be immersed in a life-like virtual environment. In our research, we explore the possibility of utilizing the power of VR for SLA by building a system called Ogma, which helps users immerse themselves in an environment representing a foreign place. In our pilot study, we built a VR system and performed user studies by comparing learning performance using VR against the traditional method. In both cases, users were given a set of ten Swedish words to learn. Results indicated that percentage retention using our VR method was significantly higher than that of the traditional method. In addition, the effectiveness and enjoyability ratings given by users were significantly higher for the VR method. This proves that our system has potential impact on SLA by using VR technology, without suffering the disadvantages of the traditional method.

References

1. Dehaan, J. and Diamond, J. The experience of telepresence with a foreign language video game and video. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Video games - Sandbox '07, (2007).
2. Emde, S.V.D., Schneider, J., and Kötter, M. Technically Speaking: Transforming Language Learning through Virtual Learning Environments (MOOs). The Modern Language Journal Modern Language J 85, 2 (2001), 210--225.
3. Harrington, M.C.R. Situational learning in real and virtual space. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators program, (2006).
4. Jackson, R.L. and Fagan, E. Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality. Proceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments - CVE '00, (2000).
5. Mcmahan, R.P., Bowman, D.A., Zielinski, D.J., and Brady, R.B. Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 4 (2012), 626--633.
6. Moss, R. Learn Immersive teaches languages in virtual reality, 2014.
7. Villarica, R. and Richards, D. Intelligent and Empathic Agent to Support Student Learning in Virtual Worlds. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment - IE2014, (2014).
8. Eberman, CarolinMcKelvie, Stuart J. "Vividness Of Visual Imagery And Source Memory For Audio And Text." Applied Cognitive Psychology 16.1 (2002): 87--95. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Web. 20 Dec. 2015.
9. Grimes, Tom. "Audio-video correspondence and its role in attention and memory." Educational Technology Research and Development 38.3 (1990): 15--25.
10. Hülsmann, Felix, et al. "Wind and warmth in virtual reality: implementation and evaluation." Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM, 2014.
11. Kemeny, Andras. "From driving simulation to virtual reality." Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM, 2014.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

      • Virtual reality

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Mixed / augmented reality

      • Virtual reality