skip to main content
10.1145/2882903.2899394acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Making the Case for Query-by-Voice with EchoQuery

Published:26 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in automatic speech recognition and natural language processing have led to a new generation of robust voice-based interfaces. Yet, there is very little work on using voice-based interfaces to query database systems. In fact, one might even wonder who in her right mind would want to query a database system using voice commands! With this demonstration, we make the case for querying database systems using a voice-based interface, a new querying and interaction paradigm we call Query-by-Voice (QbV). We will demonstrate the practicality and utility of QbV for relational DBMSs using a using a proof-of-concept system called EchoQuery. To achieve a smooth and intuitive interaction, the query interface of EchoQuery is inspired by casual human-to-human conversations. Our demo will show that voice-based interfaces present an intuitive means of querying and consuming data in a database. It will also highlight the unique advantages of QbV over the more traditional approaches, text-based or visual interfaces, for applications where context switching is too expensive, too risky or even not possible at all.

References

  1. Alexa Voice Service. https://developer.amazon.com/appsandservices/solutions/alexa/alexa-voice-service. Accessed: 2016-01--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amazon Echo / Alexa. http://www.amazon.com/echo. Accessed: 2016-01--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple Siri. http://www.apple.com/ios/siri/. Accessed: 2016-01--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google Voice Action. https://developers.google.com/voice-actions/. Accessed: 2016-01--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. MIMIC II Dataset. http://mimic.physionet.org. Accessed: 2016-01--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. I. Androutsopoulos et al. Natural language interfaces to databases - an introduction. Natural Language Engineering, 1(1):29--81, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Crotty et al. Vizdom: Interactive analytics through pen and touch. PVLDB, 8(12):2024--2035, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Li et al. Constructing an interactive natural language interface for relational databases. PVLDB, 8(1):73--84, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Li et al. Nalir: an interactive natural language interface for querying relational databases. In International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 2014, Snowbird, UT, USA, June 22--27, 2014, pages 709--712, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. O'Neil et al. Star Schema Benchmark. http://www.cs.umb.edu/poneil/StarSchemaB.PDF, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Terlecki et al. On improving user response times in tableau. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '15, pages 1695--1706, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making the Case for Query-by-Voice with EchoQuery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMOD '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data
      June 2016
      2300 pages
      ISBN:9781450335317
      DOI:10.1145/2882903

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader