skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892317acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Beyond the Blandscape: Utilizing Aesthetics in Digital Cartography

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the rich design history within the field of cartography, the majority of digital maps exhibit a dominant aesthetic that is primarily designed to serve the usability and utility requirements of turn-by-turn urban navigation producing a so-called 'blandscape' of map design. In this research we consider not only how to produce more visually appealing digital maps, but also how the cartographic decisions made in the production of maps can influence behavior, particularly with regard to the encouragement of explorative experiences. Novel cartographic and technological solutions are therefore presented, which address exploration using digital maps in the context of location based gaming and tourism. These examples demonstrate the potential of digital cartography to influence behavior and the importance of aesthetics in the cartographic process.

References

  1. Ballatore, A, and Bertolotto, M. Personalizing maps. Communications of the ACM 58, no. 12 (2015): 68--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gradinar, A., Huck, J., Coulton, P., Lochrie, M., & Tsekleves, E.. Designing for the dichotomy of immersion in location based games. Proceedings of Foundations of Digital Games 2015, (2015): 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Field, K. Cartomyopic musings. The Cartographic Journal, 50(1), (2013), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Field, K., & Demaj, D. Reasserting design relevance in cartography: some concepts. The Cartographic Journal, 49(1), (2012), 70--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Huck, J., Coulton, P., Gradinar, A., & Whyatt, D. (2015). Cartography, location-based gaming and the legibility of mixed reality spaces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd GIS Research UK Conference, Leeds, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kent, A.J. Cartographic blandscapes and the new noise: Finding the good view in a topographical mashup. The Bulletin of the Society of Cartographers 42, no. 1 (2008): 29--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lynch, K. The image of the city (Vol. 11). MIT press, (1960).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rashid, O., Mullins, I., Coulton, P., & Edwards, R. (2006). Extending Cyberspace:Location Based Games Using Cellular Phones.Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 4(1), 1--18. 10.1145/1111293.1111302 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wood, C. H., and Keller, C. P. (1996). Design: its place in cartography. In: Wood, C. H., & Keller, C. P. (Eds.). Cartographic Design: Theoretical and practical perspectives.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wright, J. K. Map-makers are human: comments on the subjective in maps, Cartographica, 19, (1977), pp. 8-25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Beyond the Blandscape: Utilizing Aesthetics in Digital Cartography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader