skip to main content
article
Free Access

Explicit allocation of best-effort packet delivery service

Published:01 August 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 I K. Bala. I. Ck~on, and K~ Schmby, ~'Congestion ~omml for ihigh-speed packet switched networks,'* in Proc. 1NFOCOM'~), San Francisco, CA, 1990, pp, 52~526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 R. Cheng, *'Receive~r and. sender payment of di.ftbre~atial services in the tnternet," Massaehusset~ InsL Te~bnoL, Cambridge, Te.eh. Rep,, 1998, to be. publis~d.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 D. Clark; S. Shm~ker, and L Zh~ng., ':'Sup~rtiag real4ime appfications i~ an mteg:rated services packet :network: ArcNtecture a.~d mechanism," in Prec. ACMSIGCOMM'92 Baltimore, MD, 1~2, ppo 14-26o Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 D. Clark, "Combining sender and receiver pa~em schemes in the Interact," in Ngerconnectiam and.No Internet: Selected Papers from t996 relecom Policy Research Conf, G~ L, R.osston and D~ Waterman, ~s. Mahwah, N J: El.rbaum,: 1996, pp. 95~112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 'Inteme~. cost alk~ation and {_~icing,,:' i.rl Internet Economic:s, L~ McKnight and L Bailey, Fxis. Cambridge:, MA: MIT Press, 1.99:7, pp. 215-253. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 A. Demers, .S. Keshave, ,'rod S. 8henker, "Analysis .and simu!ations of a f~ir q ueueing algorithm," in Pn.~c~ A CM SIGCOMM'89, Austin.,: TX,. I989, pp, I-i2. K. Fall and S, Noyd, Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 "SimuI~tion-based comp,~sons of Tah~, Reno, and SACK TCP," Comps, C.ormm~n~. Rev.:, vol. 26, no. 3, pp., 5-2t, July 1.9:96. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 W,. Fang~ "Sinmlation results of bu{k~data transfer in t:he 'exacted capacity' framework;'" Princeton Univ,., Princeton, NJ., Tech. Rep. {OnIine}. Available FTP: merc.t~D,.lcs.mR.edu Directory:/pub/wNngGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 S. Floyd and V. Jacobson, "On traffic phase effects in packet--swilehed romers," lrtternetworking; Rex. ~p., voL 3, no~ 13, pp. i15--156,. Sept,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Raridom early., detection gateways. for cc.n. gestio.n, avoidance.". I.EEE~5ICM trans. Networking,, vol. 3, pp. 397413, At~g. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 S. Noyd, "TCP and explicit congestion ~otification?'. Compu:t Commun. Rev., vel. 24, no~ 5, pp. 10~23, Oct. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 (~L i~). "N;s simulator tests for random early detection (RED) gateways." {Onlir~.eI~ Available: h~://www-r~rg.ee.JbI.gov}r~sGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 (Mar. 1~6).~ "Issues of TCP with SACK," Law.fence Berkeo ley Nat:,. Lab. Teclt. Repo. {Onli~.~e}. AvMable ~:: ftp://fip.ee.tbLgov DirectoE~: lpaper~i ssues.sa.ps.ZGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 S.,. Noyd and K. Fall, "Router mechanisms to sup.~rt end..tooe~d cx.mgestion c:ontroI," {Onlitle}:. Available www: .http://www.~nrg,ee:,lbl,govlnrg:.~. pa~rs,.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 A, Gupta, D. Stahi, and A. Wt~i~ston, "Prit~rity pricing of integrated ~'ices networks," :irt Nternet Economics, L.~ Mc~ight and L Bailey, Eds~ Cmnbfidge, MA: MIT Press, 1997~ pp~. 253=279. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 I. H~, ',Improving tile stuart, up .~.ttavio~ of a ctmgestioe conm)l scheme for TCP," in Proc. ACM StGCOMM*96, Starff0N, CA, 1996, pp,. 270--280, Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 N, {OnlineI, Available www: ht~p:ltw~.,w.mrg.e.e.,.lbkgovtns/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 V. Jacobson, "'Congestion avoidance and ~omm|," in Proc, ACMSIG- COMM'88, StanfoN, CA, 1988,: pp. 3 i4~32.9, Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 L Mac~e-Masot, ~md H. V~an,: ".Economic E~Q's aN,rot the lntemeC" in Nternet Eco,wmics, L. McKnight and J. Bailey, Eds~ Cambfidge~ MA: MIT Press, pp. ,:%~63~ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 L Zhang, S. Shenker.~ arid D,. Clark, '~Ob~rvations on the dvn.oanics of a .congestion control algorithm: The effects of two.way traffic," in .Pn,c: ACM SIGCOMM"gL Zurich., Swi(zeriand, Sept. 1991, pp~ I33M48. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 L. Zttang, S, Deering, D. Estfin~ S~ Slmnker, and D. Zappala, '"RSVP:: A. new .resource ReSerVation prot~:.oI," IEEE Nen~ork, voi, 7, pp, 8-18, Sept. I~3. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Explicit allocation of best-effort packet delivery service

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in

                  Full Access

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader