skip to main content
10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21198acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life

Published:17 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces the theoretical lens of the everyday to intersect and extend the emerging bodies of research on contestational design and infrastructures of civic engagement. Our analysis of social theories of everyday life suggests a design space that distinguishes 'privileged moments' of civic engagement from a more holistic understanding of the everyday as 'product-residue.' We analyze various efforts that researchers have undertaken to design infrastructures of civic engagement along two axes: the everyday-ness of the engagement fostered (from 'privileged moments' to 'product-residue') and the underlying paradigm of political participation (from consensus to contestation). Our analysis reveals the dearth and promise of infrastructures that create friction---provoking contestation through use that is embedded in the everyday life of citizens. Ultimately, this paper is a call to action for designers to create friction.

References

  1. Agre, P. (1997). Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In G. Bowker, S. L. Star, W. Turner, & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 131--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Asad, M. & Le Dantec, C. (2015). Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. In Proc. CSCW 2015. ACM Press, 1694--1703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, J. & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is "critical" about critical design? In Proc. CHI 2013. ACM Press, 3297--3306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proc. DIS 2012. ACM Press, 288--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N. G., Bødker, S., Korn, M., & Zander, P.-O. (2011). Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology. In Proc. C&T 2011. ACM Press, 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Borchorst, N. G., Bødker, S., & Zander, P.-O. (2009). The boundaries of participatory citizenship. In Proc. ECSCW 2009. Springer, 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Borning, A., Friedman, B., Davis, J., & Lin, P. (2005). Informing public deliberation: value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation. In Proc. ECSCW 2005. Springer, 449--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bowker, G. (1994). Information mythology: The world of/as information. In L. Bud-Frierman (Ed.), Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business (pp. 231--247). London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proc. NordiCHI 2006. ACM Press, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (1996). Developing the Blacksburg electronic village. Commun. ACM 39(12), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chalmers, M. & Galani, A. (2004). Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. In Proc. DIS 2004. ACM Press, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Clement, A., McPhail, B., Smith, K. L., & Ferenbok, J. (2012). Probing, mocking and prototyping: participatory approaches to identity infrastructuring. In Proc. PDC 2012, ACM Press, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Crivellaro, C., Comber, R., Bowers, J., Wright, P. C., & Olivier, P. (2014). A pool of dreams: Facebook, politics and the emergence of a social movement. In Proc. CHI 2014. ACM Press, 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial Design. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. DiSalvo, C., Nourbakhsh, I., Holstius, D., Akin, A., & Louw, M. (2008). The Neighborhood Networks project: a case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. In Proc. PDC 2008. ACM Press, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dourish, P. & Bell G. (2007). The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34(3), 414--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Dourish, P. & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Everett, S. P., Greene, K. K., Byrne, M. D., Wallach, D. S., Derr, K., Sandler, D., & Torous, T. (2008). Electronic voting machines versus traditional methods: improved preference, similar performance. In Proc. CHI 2008. ACM Press, 883--892. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Farina, C., Epstein, D., Heidt, J., & Newhart, M. (2014). Designing an online civic engagement platform: Balancing 'more' vs. 'better' participation in complex public policymaking. International Journal of E-Politics 5(1), 16--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Foth, M., Schroeter, R., & Anastasiu, I. (2011). Fixing the city one photo at a time: mobile logging of maintenance requests. In Proc. OzCHI 2011. ACM Press, 126--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Galloway, A. (2004). Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city. Cultural Studies 18(2/3), 384--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Halttunen, V., Juustila, A., & Nuojua, J. (2010). Technologies to support communication between citizens and designers in participatory urban planning process. In S. Wallin, L. Horelli, & J. Saad-Sulonen (Eds.), Digital Tools in Participatory Planning (pp. 79--91). Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Aalto University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Han, K., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Local News Chatter: augmenting community news by aggregating hyperlocal microblog content in a tag cloud. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30(12), 1003--1014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hassenzahl, M. (2011). Towards an Aesthetic of Friction. TEDxHogeschoolUtrecht. http://youtu.be/ehWdLEXSoh8 (Retrieved: Dec. 10, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hassenzahl, M. & Laschke, M. (2015). Pleasurable troublemakers. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications (ch. 6, pp. 167--195). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirsch, T. (2008). Contestational Design: Innovation for Political Activism. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirsch, T. (2009). Communities real and imagined: designing a communication system for Zimbabwean activists. In Proc. C&T 2009. ACM Press, 71--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hirsch, T. (2009). Learning from activists: lessons for designers. interactions 16(3), 31--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hirsch, T. (2011). More than friends: social and mobile media for activist organizations. In M. Foth, L. Forlano, C. Satchell, & M. Gibbs (Eds.), From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen (pp. 135--150). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirsch, T. & Henry, J. (2005). TXTmob: Text messaging for protest swarms. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005. ACM Press, 1455--1458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hosio, S., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Jurmu, M., Riekki, J., & Ojala, T. (2012). From school food to skate parks in a few clicks: using public displays to bootstrap civic engagement of the young. In Proc. Pervasive 2012. Springer, 425--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Irani, L. C. & Silberman, M. S. (2013). Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proc. CHI 2013. ACM Press, 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(4).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Khovanskaya, V., Baumer, E. P. S., Cosley, D., Voida, S., & Gay, G. (2013). "Everybody knows what you're doing": a critical design approach to personal informatics. In Proc. CHI 2013. ACM Press, 3403--3412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Korn, M. (2013). Situating Engagement: Ubiquitous Infrastructures for In-Situ Civic Engagement. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Aarhus University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Korn, M. & Back, J. (2012). Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places. In Proc. NordiCHI 2012. ACM Press, 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Korsgaard, H. & Brynskov, M. (2014). City bug report: urban prototyping as participatory process and practice. In Proc. MAB 2014. ACM Press, 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Kuznetsov, S. & Paulos, E. (2010). Participatory sensing in public spaces: activating urban surfaces with sensor probes. In Proc. DIS 2010. ACM Press, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Laschke, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Diefenbach, S. (2011). Things with attitude: Transformational products. In Proc. Create11: The Interaction Design Symposium, London, UK, 23rd June 2011, http://www.create-conference.org/storage/create11papersposters/Things%20with%20attitude.pdf (Retrieved: Dec. 10, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Leahu, L., Thom-Santelli, J., Pederson, C., & Sengers, P. (2008). Taming the Situationist beast. In Proc. DIS 2008. ACM Press, 203--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Le Dantec, C. A. & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43(2), 241--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Lee, C. P., Dourish, P. & Mark, G. (2006). The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proc. CSCW 2006. ACM Press, 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lefebvre, H. (2014). Critique of Everyday Life. London: Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehner, U., Baldauf, M., Eranti, V., Reitberger, W., & Fröhlich, P. (2014). Civic engagement meets pervasive gaming: towards long-term mobile participation. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014. ACM Press, 1483--1488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lievrouw, L. A. (2006). Oppositional and activist new media: remediation, reconfiguration, participation. In Proc. PDC 2006. ACM Press, 115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Mainwaring, S. D., Cheng, M. F., & Anderson, K. (2004). Infrastructures and their discontents: Implications for Ubicomp. In Proc. Ubicomp 2004. Springer, 418--432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Mascaro, C. M. & Goggins, S. P. (2011). Brewing up citizen engagement: the Coffee Party on Facebook. In Proc. C&T 2011. ACM Press, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Monroy-Hernández, A., Farnham, S., Kiciman, E., Counts, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2013). Smart societies: from citizens as sensors to collective action. interactions 20(4), 16--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Political Science Series 72. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Paulos, E., Honicky, RJ, & Hooker, B. (2009). Citizen science: Enabling participatory urbanism. In M. Foth (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics (ch. XXVIII, pp. 414--436). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Pipek, V. & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 10(5), 447--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society 27(4), 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Robertson, S. P. (2005). Voter-centered design: Toward a voter decision support system. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12(2), 263--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Robertson, S. P. & Vatrapu, R. K. (2010). Digital government. Ann. Rev. Info. Sci. Tech. 44(1), 317--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Schroeter, R., Foth, M., & Satchell, C. (2012). People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. In Proc. DIS 2012. ACM Press, 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Semaan, B. C., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., & Maruyama, M. (2014). Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In Proc. CSCW 2014. ACM Press, 1409--1421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective design. In Proc. Aarhus 2005: Critical Computing. ACM Press, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Star, S. L. & Bowker, G. C. (2006). How to infrastructure. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of New Media: Student Edition (pp. 230--245). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information. Information Systems Research 7(1), 111--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D. M., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2012). Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM Press, 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Tufekci, Z. & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication 62(2), 363--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Vlachokyriakos, V., Comber, R., Ladha, K., Taylor, N., Dunphy, P., McCorry, P., & Olivier, P. (2014). PosterVote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism. In Proc. DIS 2014. ACM Press, 795--804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Voida, A., Dombrowski, L., Hayes, G. R., & Mazmanian, M. (2014). Shared values/conflicting logics: working around e-government systems. In Proc. CHI 2014. ACM Press, 3583--3592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Voida, A., Yao, Z., & Korn, M. (2015). (Infra)structures of volunteering. In Proc. CSCW 2015. ACM Press, 1704--1716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Wagner, I., Basile, M., Ehrenstrasser, L., Maquil, V., Terrin, J.-J., & Wagner, M. (2009). Supporting community engagement in the city: urban planning in the MR-tent. In Proc. C&T 2009. ACM Press, 185--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Weise, S., Hardy, J., Agarwal, P., Coulton, P., Friday, A., & Chiasson, M. (2012). Democratizing ubiquitous computing: a right for locality. In Proc. UbiComp 2012. ACM Press, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265, 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Wulf, V., Aal, K., Kteish, I. A., Atam, M., Schubert, K., Rohde, M., Yerousis, G. P., & Randall, D. (2013). Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. In Proc. CHI 2013. ACM Press, 1979--1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Wulf, V., Misaki, K., Atam, M., Randall, D., & Rohde, M. (2013). 'On the ground' in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the Tunisian revolution. In Proc. CSCW 2013. ACM Press, 1409--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Zerubavel, E. (1991). The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader