skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858539acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Taking a HIT: Designing around Rejection, Mistrust, Risk, and Workers' Experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online crowd labor markets often address issues of risk and mistrust between employers and employees from the employers' perspective, but less often from that of employees. Based on 437 comments posted by crowd workers (Turkers) on the Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) participation agreement, we identified work rejection as a major risk that Turkers experience. Unfair rejections can result from poorly-designed tasks, unclear instructions, technical errors, and malicious Requesters. Because the AMT policy and platform provide little recourse to Turkers, they adopt strategies to minimize risk: avoiding new and known bad Requesters, sharing information with other Turkers, and choosing low-risk tasks. Through a series of ideas inspired by these findings-including notifying Turkers and Requesters of a broken task, returning rejected work to Turkers for repair, and providing collective dispute resolution mechanisms-we argue that making reducing risk and building trust a first-class design goal can lead to solutions that improve outcomes around rejected work for all parties in online labor markets.

References

  1. Gilles Adda and Joseph J. Mariani. 2014. Crowdsourcing for Speech: Economic, Legal and Ethical Analysis. HAL Archives No. HAL-01067110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pat Barrett. 2014. New development: Risk management-how to regain trust and confidence in government. Public Money & Management, 34(6), 459--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benjamin B. Bederson and Alexander J. Quinn. 2011. Web Workers, Unite! Addressing challenges of online laborers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 97106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lisa J. Bernt. 2014. Suppressing the mischief: New work, old problems. North Eastern University Law Journal, 6, 2: 311--346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chris Callison-Burch. 2014. Crowd-Workers: Aggregating information across Turkers to help them find higher paying work. In Proceedings of the Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP '14), Works in Progress and Demonstration Abstracts, 8--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jesse Chandler, Pam Mueller and Gabriele Paolacci. 2014. Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavioral Research 46, 1: 112--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Justin Cheng, Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal and Michael S. Bernstein. 2015. Break It Down: A comparison of macro- and microtasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 4061--4064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lydia B. Chilton, John J. Horton, Robert C. Miller and Shiri Azenkot. 2010. Task search in a human computation market. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation (HCOMP '10), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stacie Conchie and Calvin Burns. 2008. Trust and risk communication in high-risk organizations: A test of principles from social risk research, Journal of Risk Research, 28, 1: 141--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Karen Cook, Russell Hardin and Margaret Levi. 2005. Cooperation without Trust? Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust. NY, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Djellel Eddine Difallah, Gianluca Demartini and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2012. Mechanical Cheat: Spamming schemes and adversarial techniques on crowdsourcing platforms. In CrowdSearch 2012 workshop. Lyon, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mira Dontcheva, Robert Morris, Joel Brandt and Elizabeth Gerber. 2014. Combining crowdsourcing and learning to improve engagement and performance. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (CSCW '14), 3379--3388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Steven Dow, Anand Kulkarni, Scott Klemmer and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 1013--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Timothy C. Earle. 2010. Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30, 4: 541--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cynthia R Farina, Dmitry Epstein, Josiah Heidt and Mary J Newhart. 2014. Designing an online civic engagement platform: Balancing more vs. better participation in complex public policymaking. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP) 5, 1, 16--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alek Felstiner. 2011. Working the crowd: Employment and labor law in the crowdsourcing industry. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 32, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Eric J. Friedman and Paul Resnick. 2000. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10, 2: 173--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mark Granovetter. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 1, 33--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Neha Gupta, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, David Martin and Jacki O'Neill. 2014a. Understanding Indian crowdworkers. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (CSCW '14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Neha Gupta, David Martin and Jacki O'Niel. 2014b. Turk-life in India. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Jutta K.Willamowski, Saiganesh Swaminathan, David B. Martin. 2015. TurkBench: Rendering the market for Turkers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2010. Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 17, 2, 16--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis and John J. Horton. 2012. The need for standardization in crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Langdon Winner. 1999. Do artifacts have politics? In The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd. ed.), Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (eds.). Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 28--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Edward Lawler. 2013. Being on the edge of chaos: Social psychology and the problem of social order. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 42, 1: 340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Niklas Luhmann. 1998. Familiarity, confidence, and trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (ed), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp.94--107), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lilly C. Irani and M. Six. Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Aniket Kittur, Ed Chi and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 453--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matthew Lease and John Horton. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 1301--1318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jörn Klinger and Matthew Lease. 2011. Enabling trust in crowd labor relations through identity sharing. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '11).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Nicolas Kokalis, Thomas Köhn, Carl Pfeiffer, Dima Chornyi, Michael S. Bernstein and Scott R. Klemmer. 2013. EmailValet: Managing email overload through private, accountable crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 1291--1300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Anand Kulkarni, Matthew Can and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with Turkomatic. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 1003--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jennifer Marlow and Laura A. Dabbish. 2014. Who's the boss?: Requester transparency and motivation in a microtask marketplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 2533--2538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. David Martin, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a Turker. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '14), 224--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Brian McInnis, Elizabeth Murnane, Dmitry Epstein, Dan Cosley, and Gilly Leshed. To appear. One and done: Factors affecting one-time contributors to ad-hoc online communities. To appear in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert crowdsourcing with Flash Teams. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '14), 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Denise M. Rousseau, Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt and Colin Camerer. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 3: 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Niloufar Salehi, Lilly C. Irani, Michael S. Bernstein, Ali Al Khatib, Eva Ogbe, Kristy Milland and Clickhappier. 2014. WeAreDynamo: Overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1621--1630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. Six Silberman, Joel Ross, Lilly Irani and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Seller problems in human computation markets. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation (HCOMP '10), 18--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Robert E. Stake. 1995. The art of case study research: Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Stephen Wolfson and Matthew Lease. 2011. Look before you leap: Legal pitfalls of crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '11).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Robert I. Sutton and Andrew Hargadon. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a production design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 4: pp. 685--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Anbang Xu, Shih Huang and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant: Generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '14), 1433--1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jonathan Zittrain. 2009. The future of the Internet and how to stop it. Yale University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Taking a HIT: Designing around Rejection, Mistrust, Risk, and Workers' Experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader