skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858371acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Finding the Way to OSM Mapping Practices: Bounding Large Crisis Datasets for Qualitative Investigation

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the most widely used volunteer geographic information system. Although it is increasingly relied upon during humanitarian response as the most up-to-date, accurate, or accessible map of affected areas, the behavior of the mappers who contribute to it is not well understood. In this paper, we explore the work practices and interactions of volunteer mappers operating in the high-tempo, high-volume context of disasters. To do this, we built upon and expanded prior network analysis techniques to select high-value portions of the vast OSM data for further qualitative analysis. We then performed detailed content analysis of the identified activity and, where possible, conducted interviews with the participants. This research allowed the identification of seven distinct mapping practices that can be classified according to dimensions of time, space, and interpersonal interaction. Our work represents a baseline for future research about how OSM crisis mapping practices have evolved over time.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1642.mp4

mp4

4.2 MB

References

  1. Louai Alarabi, Ahmed Eldawy, Rami Alghamdi, and Mohamed F. Mokbel. 2014. TAREEG: a MapReducebased system for extracting spatial data from OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the SIGSPATIAL Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL '14), 83--92. DOI=10.1145/2666310.2666403 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jennings Anderson, Robert Soden, Kenneth M. Anderson, Marina Kogan, and Leysia Palen. 2015. EPIC-OSM: A Software Framework for OpenStreetMap Data Analytics. To Appear in Proceedings of the Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-49). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3: Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12: 23012309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Susan L. Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '05), 1--10. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099203.1099205 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nama R. Budhathoki and Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2012. Motivation for Open Collaboration: Crowd and Community Models and the Case of OpenStreetMap. In American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 5: 548--575. DOI=10.1177/0002764212469364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Aaron Clauset and Nathan Eagle. 2012. Persistence and periodicity in a dynamic proximity network. arXiv:1211.7343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Padraig Corcoran, Peter Mooney, and Michela Bertolotto. 2013. Analysing the growth of OpenStreetMap networks. In Spatial Statistics 3: 21--32. DOI=10.1016/j.spasta.2013.01.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Martin Dittus, Giovanni Quattrone, and Licia Capra. Analysing volunteer engagement in humanitarian mapping: building contributor communities at large scale. To Appear In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW '92), 107--114. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/143457.143468 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Russell Rowe Dynes. 1970. Organized Behavior in Disaster. Heath Lexington Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarah Elwood. 2008. Volunteered Geographic Information: Future Research Directions Motivated by Critical, Participatory, and Feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72, 3&4: 173--183. DOI=10.1007/s10708-008--9186-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Thore Fechner, Dennis Wilhelm, and Christian Kray. 2015. Ethermap: Real-time Collaborative Map Editing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 3583--3592. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702536 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Charles E. Fritz and J. H. Mathewson. 1957. Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem in Social Control. Committee on Disaster Studies, Disaster Study No. 9. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Michael F. Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4: 211--221. DOI=10.1007/s10708-007--9111-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Aric Hagberg, Pieter Swart, and Daniel Schult. 2008. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008), 11--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mordechai Haklay. 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 682--703. DOI=10.1068/b35097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1992. Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1,1: 24--48. DOI=10.1007/BF00752451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Desislava Hristova, Giovanni Quattrone, Afra Mashhadi, and Licia Capra. 2013. The Life of the Party: Impact of Social Mapping in OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2013), 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Amanda L. Hughes, Leysia Palen, Jeannette Sutton, Sophia B. Liu, and Sarah Vieweg. 2008. "Site-Seeing" in Disaster: An Examination of On-Line Social Convergence. In Proceedings of Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM '08), 324--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Brian C. Keegan. 2012. Breaking news on Wikipedia: dynamics, structures, and roles in high-tempo collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (CSCW '12), 315--318. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2141512.2141609 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Brian Keegan, Darren Gergle, and Noshir Contractor. 2011. Hot off the wiki: dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia's coverage of the Tohoku catastrophes. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11), 105--113. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2038558.2038577 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Brian Keegan, Darren Gergle, and Noshir Contractor. 2012. Staying in the loop: structure and dynamics of Wikipedia's breaking news collaborations. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '12). Article 1, 10 pages. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2462932.2462934 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. James M. Kendra and Tricia Wachtendorf. 2003. Reconsidering Convergence and Converger Legitimacy in Response to the World Trade Center Disaster. Terrorism and Disaster: New Threats, New Ideas (Research in Social Problems and Public Policy) 11: 97--122. DOI=10.1016/S0196--1152(03)11007--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton, and Ed H. Chi. 2007. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), 453--462. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240698 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Aniket Kittur, Ed Chi, Bryan A. Pendleton, Bongwon Suh, and Todd Mytkowicz. 2007. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In Proceedings of alt.CHI 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Marina Kogan, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2015. Think Local, Retweet Global: Retweeting by the Geographically-Vulnerable during Hurricane Sandy. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 981--993. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2675133.2675218 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yu-Wei Lin. 2011. A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 17, 1: 53--71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2011.552647 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mikel Maron. 2010. Haiti OpenStreetMap Response. Image. (14 January 2010). Retrieved May 20, 2015 from http://brainoff.com/weblog/2010/01/14/1518Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Alan McConchie. 2013. Introducing "Map-Gardening". Retrieved September 15, 2015 from http://mappingmashups.net/2013/05/25/introducingmap-gardening/./..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Patrick Meier, 2015. Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data is changing the Face of Humanitarian Response. Taylor & Francis Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Peter Mooney and Padraig Corcoran. 2012. How social is OpenStreetMap? 24--27. In Proceedings of International Conference on Geographic Information Science (AGILE 2012), 282--287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Peter Mooney and Padraig Corcoran. 2014. Analysis of Interaction and Co-editing Patterns amongst OpenStreetMap Contributors. Transactions in GIS 18, 5: 633--659. DOI= 10.1111/tgis.12051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Pascal Neis, and Alexander Zipf. 2012. Analyzing the Contributor Activity of a Volunteered Geographic Information Project -- The Case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1, 2: 146--165. DOI=10.3390/ijgi1020146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Leysia Palen, Sarah Vieweg, Sophia B. Liu, and Amanda Lee Hughes. 2009. Crisis in a Networked World. In Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 27, 4: 467--480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439309332302 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Leysia Palen, Robert Soden, T. Jennings Anderson, and Mario Barrenechea. 2015. Success & Scale in a DataProducing Organization: The Socio-Technical Evolution of OpenStreetMap in Response to Humanitarian Events. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 4113--4122. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702294 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Katherine Panciera. 2011. User lifecycles in cyclopath: a survey of users. In Proceedings of iConference (iConference '11), 741--742. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1940761.1940892 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sung-Yueh Perng, Monika Buscher, Lisa Wood, Ragnhild Halvorsrud, Michael Stiso, Leonardo Ramirez, and Amro Al-Akkad. 2013. Peripheral response: microblogging during the 22/7/2011 Norway attacks. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management 5, 1: 41--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. John W. Powell. 1954. An introduction to the natural history of disaster. University of Maryland: Disaster Research Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Reid Priedhorsky and Loren Terveen. 2008. The computational geowiki: what, why, and how. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '08), 267--276. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460606 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong (Tony) K. Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. 2007. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '07), 259--268. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1316624.1316663 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Tom A. B. Snijders. 2006. Statistical Methods for Network Dynamics. In Proceedings of the XLIII Scientific Meeting of the Italian Statistical Society, 281--296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Robert Soden and Leysia Palen. 2014. From Crowdsourced Mapping to Community Mapping: The Post-Earthquake Work of OpenStreetMap Haiti. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP '14), 311--326. DOI=10.1007/978--3--319-06498--7_19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1071--1080. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979102 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2013. Working and sustaining the virtual "Disaster Desk". In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13), 491--502. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2441776.2441832 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Emanuele Strano, Vincenzo Nicosia, Vito Latora, Sergio Porta, and Marc Barthelemy. 2012. Elementary processes governing the evolution of road networks. In Scientific Reports 2, 296. DOI=10.1038/srep00296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Joanne I. White, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2014. Digital mobilization in disaster response: the work & self-organization of on-line pet advocates in response to hurricane sandy. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14), 866--876. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2531602.2531633 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Finding the Way to OSM Mapping Practices: Bounding Large Crisis Datasets for Qualitative Investigation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2016
        6108 pages
        ISBN:9781450333627
        DOI:10.1145/2858036

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader