skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858326acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Civic technology, or civic tech, encompasses a rich body of work, inside and outside HCI, around how we shape technology for, and in turn how technology shapes, how we govern, organize, serve, and identify matters of concern for communities. This study builds on previous work by investigating how civic leaders in a large US city conceptualize civic tech, in particular, how they approach the intersection of data, design and civics. We encountered a range of overlapping voices, from providers, to connectors, to volunteers of civic services and resources. Through this account, we identified different conceptions and expectation of data, design and civics, as well as several shared issues around pressing problems and strategic aspirations. Reflecting on this set of issues produced guiding questions, in particular about the current and possible roles for design, to advance civic tech.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p2970-boehner.mp4

mp4

254.9 MB

References

  1. Asad, M. and Le Dantec, C.A. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. In Proc. of CSCW 2015. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1694--1703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. and Stolterman, E. 2014. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proc. of CHI 2014, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 1951--1960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J.,, Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J. and Antanitis. J. 2012. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proc. Of DIS 2012, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 288--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N.G., Bødker, S., Korn, M., and Zander, P. 2011. Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Busse, D., Borning, A., Mann, S., Hirsch, T., Nathan, L., Grimes Parker, A., Shneiderman, S., and Nunez, B. 2013. CHI at the barricades: an activist agenda?. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2407--2412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chau, C., Mathur, A., and Bers. M. 2006. Active citizenship through technology: collaboration, connection, and civic participation. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences (ICLS '06). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 902--903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Crivellaro, C., Comber, R., Bowers, J., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. 2014. A pool of dreams: facebook, politics and the emergence of a social movement. In Proc. of CHI 2014, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Crivellaro, C., Comber, R., Dade-Robertson, M., Bowen, S., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. 2015. Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2853--2862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Department of Making and Doing. http://dmdphilly.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DiSalvo, C., Gregg, M., and Lodato, T. 2014. Building belonging. interactions 21, 4 (July 2014), 58--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. DiSalvo, C., Lodato, T., Jenkins, T., Lukens, J., Kim, T. (2014). Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. In Proc. of CHI 2014, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2397--2406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Farnham, S., Keyes, D., Yuki, V., and Tugwell C. 2012. Puget sound off: fostering youth civic engagement through citizen journalism. In Proc. Of CSCW, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Foth, M. 2011. From social butterfly to engaged citizen: Urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Foth, M., Parra Agudelo, L., and Palleis, R. 2013. Digital soapboxes: towards an interaction design agenda for situated civic innovation. In Proc. UbiComp '13 Adjunct. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 725--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Friedman Hewitt, J. 2009. COVER STORY: Citizencentered design (slowly) revolutionizes the media and experience of U.S. elections. interactions 16, 5 (September 2009), 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gaver. W. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proc. of CHI 2012, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gaver, W., Michael, M., Kerridge, T., Wilkie, A., Boucher, A., Ovalle, L., and Plummer-Fernandez, M. 2015. Energy Babble: Mixing Environmentally-Oriented Internet Content to Engage Community Groups. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1115--1124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gerber, E. 2014. Design for America: organizing for civic innovation. interactions 21, 2 (March 2014), 42--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Greenfield, A. (2013) Against the Smart City. NYC: Do projects.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Harding, M., Knowles, B., Davies, N., and Rouncefield, M. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2833--2842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Helsinki Design Lab. http://helsinkidesignlab.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirsch, T. 2010. Water wars: designing a civic game about water scarcity. In Proc. of DIS 2010, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 340--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hirsch, T. and Liu, J. 2004. Speakeasy: overcoming barriers and promoting community development in an immigrant neighborhood. In Proc. Of DIS 2014, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 345--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Irani, L. "Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship." Science, Technology & Human Values (2015): 0162243915578486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, J., Ko, E., Jung, J., Won Lee, C., Wook Kim, N., and Kim, J. 2015. Factful: Engaging Taxpayers in the Public Discussion of a Government Budget. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2843--2852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Knight Foundation. Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field, KF report, 2013. http://knightfoundation.org/features/civictech/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawson, S., Kirman, B., Linehan, C., Feltwell, T. and Hopkins, L. 2015. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM Press, (2015), 2663--2672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lou, Y. 2015. Opening Keynote -- Crossing: HCI, Design and Sustainability. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 805--806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pierce, J., Sengers, P., Hirsch, T., Jenkins, T., Gaver, W. and DiSalvo, C. 2015. Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM Press, (2105), 2083--2092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Public Design Workshop @ Georgia Tech. http://publicdesignworkshop.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson, S., Buie, E., and Murray, D. 2011. Interaction design for citizen engagement and digital government. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (dg.o '11). ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 376--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Saporta, M. CITY's legacy damaged with lack of key voices in public decisions. Saporta Report, Aug 10, 2015. http://saportareport.com/CITY-legacy-damagedwith-lack-of-public-voices-in-key-decisions/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Schuler, D. 2009. Communities, technology, and civic intelligence. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (C&T '09). ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Semaan, B., Faucett, H., Robertson, S., Maruyama, M. and Douglas, S. 2015. Designing Political Deliberation Environments to Support Interactions in the Public Sphere. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3167--3176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Simon, H. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Stoll, J., Edwards, W.K., and Foot, K. 2012. Between us and them: building connectedness within civic networks. In Proc. of CSCW 2012. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 237--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1st ed. (pp. 273--284).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, A., Lindley, S., Regan, T., Sweeney, D., Vlachokyriakos, V., Grainger, L., and Lingel, J. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2863--2872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. 2012. Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proc. of CHI 2012, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Just Design: Being Dogmatic About Defining Speculative Critical Design Future Fiction. A Medium Corporation. https://medium.com/@camerontw/just-designb1f97cb3996f#.j31k5ajerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Vlachokyriakos, V., Comber, R., Crivellaro, C., Taylor, N., Kuznetsov, S., Kavanaugh, A., Le Dantec, C. and Joon Kim, B. 2015. Designing Alternative Systems for Local Communities. In Proc. of CHI 2015, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 2333--2336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Vlachokyriakos, V., Comber, R., Ladha, K., Taylor, N., Dunphy, P., McCorry, P., and Olivier, P. 2014. PosterVote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism. In Proc. of DIS 2014, ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 795--804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Voida, A., Dombrowski, L., Hayes, G., and Mazmanian, M. 2014. Shared values/conflicting logics: working around e-government systems. In Proc. of CHI 2014, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3583--3592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader