skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858198acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Why would anybody do this?": Understanding Older Adults' Motivations and Challenges in Crowd Work

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Diversifying participation in crowd work can benefit the worker and requester. Increasing numbers of older adults are online, but little is known about their awareness of or how they engage in mainstream crowd work. Through an online survey with 505 seniors, we found that most have never heard of crowd work but would be motivated to complete tasks by earning money or working on interesting or stimulating tasks. We follow up results from the survey with interviews and observations of 14 older adults completing crowd work tasks. While our survey data suggests that financial incentives are encouraging, in-depth interviews reveal that a combination of personal and social incentives may be stronger drivers of participation, but only if older adults can overcome accessibility issues and understand the purpose of crowd work. This paper contributes insights into how crowdsourcing sites could better engage seniors and other users.

References

  1. Harini Alagarai Sampath, Rajeev Rajeshuni, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2014. Cognitively inspired task design to improve user performance on crowdsourcing platforms. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '14, ACM Press, 3665--3674. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557155 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sultana Lubna Alam and John Campbell. 2012. Crowdsourcing Motivations in a not-for-profit GLAM context: The Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program. Location, location, location: 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Morgan G Ames, Janet Go, Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2010. Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 145--154. http://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718946 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Judd Antin and Aaron Shaw. 2012. Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of Amazon Mechanical Turk in the US and India. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208699 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2015. Gauging Receptiveness to Social Microvolunteering. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '15, ACM Press, 1055--1064. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702329 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dana Chandler and Adam Kapelner. 2013. Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 90, 123--133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kathy Charmaz. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In The Handbook of Qualitative Research. 509--535. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=erLspquhd5MCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephanie Chen. 2010. No retirement for these older folks, just work. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/09/07/older.worker s.100s.90s/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Parmit K Chilana, Andrew J Ko, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2012. LemonAid?: Selection-Based Crowdsourced Contextual Help for Web Applications. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012, 1549--1558. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208620 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Graeme W Coleman, Lorna Gibson, Vicki L Hanson, Ania Bobrowicz, and Alison McKay. 2010. Engaging the disengaged. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2010, ACM Press, 175--178. http://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858202 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Erin York Cornwell and Linda J Waite. 2009. Social Disconnectedness, Perceived Isolation, and Health among Older Adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 50, 1, 31--48. http://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fergus I. M. Craik. 1994. Memory Changes in Normal Aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3, 155--158. http://doi.org/10.1111/14678721.ep10770653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. CrowdFlower. 2014. Crowd Demographics. Retrieved from https://success.crowdflower.com/hc/enus/articles/202703345-Contributors-CrowdDemographicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anna Dickinson, Alan F. Newell, Michael J. Smith, and Robin L. Hill. 2005. Introducing the Internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacting with Computers 17, 6, 621--642. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alvaro Fernandez and Goldberk Elkhonon. 2009. The SharpBrains Guide to Brain Fitness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas A Glass, Carlos Mendes de Leon, Richard A Marottoli, and Lisa F Berkman. 1999. Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 319, 478--483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Eszter Hargittai. 2009. An Update on Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy. Social Science Computer Review 27, 1, 130--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dave Harley, Kate Howland, Eric Harris, and Cara Redlich. 2014. Online communities for older users: what can we learn from local community interactions to create social sites that work for older people. Proceedings of the 28th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference on HCI, 42--51. http://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2014.5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alexis Hope, Ted Schwaba, and Anne Marie Piper. 2014. Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, 3903--3912. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557133 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Panos Ipeirotis. 2010. Demographics of Mechanical Turk. Working Paper CeDER-10-01. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585030Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Panos Ipeirotis. 2010. Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 17, 2, 16. http://doi.org/10.1145/1869086.1869094 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Susan E. Jackson and Aparna Joshi. 2004. Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25, 675--702. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Aniket Kittur, Ed H. Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '08, 453. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357127 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, et al. 2013. The future of crowd work. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '13, 1301. http://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441923 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Masatomo Kobayashi, Shoma Arita, Toshinari Itoko, Shin Saito, and Hironobu Takagi. 2015. Motivating Multi-Generational Crowd Workers in Social-Purpose Work. Proc. of CSCW '15, 1813--1824. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675255 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Masatomo Kobayashi, Tatsuya Ishihara, and Toshinari Itoko. 2013. Age-Based Task Specialization for Crowdsourced Proofreading. HCII, 104--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Karim Lakhani and Robert G Wolf. 2003. Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. Social Science Research Network 49, September, 1--27. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.443040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vilma Lehtinen, J Nasanen, and Risto Sarvas. 2009. "A little silly and empty-headed": older adults' understandings of social networking sites. BCS-HCI, British Computer Society, 45--54. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1671011.167101 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Siân E Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 09, ACM Press, 1693. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518962 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. David Martin, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a turker. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing CSCW '14, 224--235. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531663 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Winter Mason and Duncan J. Watts. 2010. Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds." ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11, 100. http://doi.org/10.1145/1809400.1809422 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nancy Morrow-Howell, Jim Hinterlong, Philip A Rozario, and Fengyan Tang. 2003. Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences 58, 3, S137-45. http://doi.org/10.2307/3090173.2001-1000900110.2307/3090173r10.1093/geronb/58.3.S137Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Daniel H. Pink. 2009. Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. http://doi.org/10.1002/caspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jakob Rogstadius, Vassilis Kostakos, Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, Jim Laredo, and Maja Vukovic. 2011. An Assessment of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Task Performance in Crowdsourcing Markets. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 321--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, and M Silberman. 2010. Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk. CHI'10 Extended?. Retrieved August 18, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American psychologist 55, 68--78. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shin Saito, Toshihiro Watanabe, Masatomo Kobayashi, and Hironobu Takagi. 2014. Skill Development Framework for Micro-Tasking. HCII, 400--409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. K W Schaie. 1996. Intellectual Development in Adulthood: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Aaron Smith. 2014. Older Adults and Technology Use. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/1mMIyvWGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren E. Watson, Kamalesh. Kumar, and Larry K. Michaelsen. 1993. Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance: Comparing Homogeneous and Diverse Task Groups. Academy of Management Journal 36, 590--602. http://doi.org/10.2307/256593Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wesley Willett, Jeffrey Heer, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2012. Strategies for crowdsourcing social data analysis. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227--236. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207709 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Svetlana Yarosh, Kori M Inkpen, and A.J. Bernheim Brush. 2010. Video playdate. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '10, 1251. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753514Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Lixiu Yu, Paul André, Aniket Kittur, and Robert Kraut. 2014. A comparison of social, learning, and financial strategies on crowd engagement and output quality. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing CSCW '14, 967--978. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531729 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Katheryn Zickuhr and Mary Madden. 2012. Older Adults and Internet Use. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-andinternet-use.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Kathryn Zyskowski, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jeffrey P Bigham, Mary L Gray, and Shaun Kane. 2015. Accessible Crowdwork? Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities. CSCW '15, ACM -- Association for Computing Machinery, 1682--1693. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675158 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Why would anybody do this?": Understanding Older Adults' Motivations and Challenges in Crowd Work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader