skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858173acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Honorable Mention

Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce Metadating -- a future-focused research and speed-dating event where single participants were invited to "explore the romance of personal data". Participants created "data profiles" about themselves, and used these to "date" other participants. In the rich context of dating, we study how personal data is used conversationally to communicate and illustrate identity. We note the manner in which participants carefully curated their profiles, expressing ambiguity before detail, illustration before accuracy. Our findings proposition a set of data services and features, each concerned with representing and curating data in new ways, beyond a focus on purely rational or analytic relationships with a quantified self. Through this, we build on emerging interest in "lived informatics" and raise questions about the experience and social reality of a "data-driven life".

References

  1. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2008. Intimate Interactions: Online Representation and Software of the Self. interactions 15, 5: 11--15. http://doi.org/10.1145/1390085.1400111 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Frederic C. Bartlett. 1932. Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mark Blythe, Jamie Steane, Jenny Roe, and Caroline Oliver. 2015. Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3849--3858. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702491 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 703--712. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557098 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles, ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. danah boyd and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15, 5: 662--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, ACM, NY, NY, USA 424--433. http://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Laura Buttrick, Conor Linehan, Ben Kirman, and Dan O'Hara. 2014. Fifty shades of CHI: the perverse and humiliating human-computer relationship. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 825--834. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559206.2578874 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Chatting. 2014. Speculation by Improvisation. In Workshop on Human-Computer Improvisation at Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). http://openlab.ncl.ac.uk/hcimprovisation/files/2014/06/ chatting-improv-v2.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1143--1152. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. James Clawson, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. 2015. No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 647--658. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2750858.2807554 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sunny Consolvo, Katherine Everitt, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 457--466. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124840 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Peter Cook. 1999. Archigram. Princeton Architectural Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andy Crabtree and Richard Mortier. 2015. Human data interaction: Historical lessons from social studies and cscw. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Springer, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Judith Donath, Alex Dragulescu, Aaron Zinman, Fernanda Viégas, and Rebecca Xiong. 2010. Data portraits. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Art Gallery (SIGGRAPH '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 375383. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1836786.1836793 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tao Dong, Mark S. Ackerman, and Mark W. Newman. 2014. "If these walls could talk": designing with memories of places. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 63--72. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598605 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Paul Dourish and Sara Bly. 1992. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), ACM, NY, NY, USA, 541--547. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/142750.142982 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nicole B. Ellison, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Catalina L. Toma. 2012. Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating selfpresentations. New Media & Society 14, 1: 45--62. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nicole Ellison, Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2006. Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 2: 415--441. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2006.00020.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Chris Elsden, David S. Kirk, and Abigail C. Durrant. 2015. A Quantified Past: Towards Design for Remembering with Personal Informatics. HumanComputer Interaction 6: 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Daniel Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, James Fogarty, and Sean Munson. 2014. Taming data complexity in lifelogs: exploring visual cuts of personal informatics data. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 667--676. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Daniel A. Epstein, Bradley H. Jacobson, Elizabeth Bales, David W. McDonald, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. From "Nobody Cares" to "Way to Go!": A Design Framework for Social Sharing in Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1622--1636. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675135 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nicholas Felton. 2005. Nicholas Felton | Feltron.com. Retrieved September 21, 2015 from http://feltron.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jon E. Froehlich, Eric Larson, Tim Campbell, Conor Haggerty, James Fogarty, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2009. HydroSense: infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 235--244. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1620545.1620581 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, and James Landay. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1999--2008. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753629 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions 6, 1: 21--29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 233--240. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642653 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Haakon Faste, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Legacy in the age of the internet: reflections on how interactive systems shape how we are remembered. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 975--984. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598579 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kevin D. Haggerty and Richard V. Ericson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. The British journal of sociology 51, 4: 605--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 433--442. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ole Sejer Iversen and Tuck W. Leong. 2012. Valuesled participatory design: mediating the emergence of values. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 468--477. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2399016.2399087 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Rachel Jacobs, Steve Benford, Mark Selby, Michael Golembewski, Dominic Price, and Gabriella Giannachi. 2013. A conversation between trees: what data feels like in the forest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 129138. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2470673 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kenji Kawakami. 1995. 101 unuseless Japanese inventions: the art of Chindogu. WW Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. David Kirby. 2009. The Future is now: Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-World Technological Development. Social Studies of Science. http://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709338325Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaun Lawson, Ben Kirman, Conor Linehan, Tom Feltwell, and Lisa Hopkins. 2015. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2663--2672. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stagebased model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 557--566. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding my data, myself: supporting selfreflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 405--414. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2030112.2030166 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ian Li, Jon Froehlich, Jakob E. Larsen, Catherine Grevet, and Ernesto Ramirez. 2013. Personal informatics in the wild: hacking habits for health & happiness. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3179--3182. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2468356.2479641 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. James J. Lin, Lena Mamykina, Silvia Lindtner, Gregory Delajoux, and Henry B. Strub. 2006. Fish-n-Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Joseph Lindley, Dhruv Sharma, and Robert Potts. 2015. Anticipatory Ethnography: Design Fiction as an Input to Design Ethnography. In Proceesings of the 2015 Conference on Ethnographic Praxis in Industry (EPIC '15). 237--253. doi:10.1111/1559--8918.01030Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Conor Linehan, Ben J. Kirman, Stuart Reeves, Mark A. Blythe, Joshua G. Tanenbaum, Audrey Desjardins, and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 45--48. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559206.2560472 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Deborah Lupton. 2014. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design (OzCHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 77--86. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2686612.2686623 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Deborah Lupton. 2014. Self-Tracking Modes: Reflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2483549Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Deborah Lupton. 2013. Understanding the Human Machine {Commentary}. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE 32, 4: 25--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and David R. Kaufman. 2006. Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), ACM, NY, NY, USA, 927--936. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124910 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. HumanData Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2508051Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Bettina Nissen and John Bowers. 2015. Data-Things: Digital Fabrication Situated within Participatory Data Translation Activities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2467--2476. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702245 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. William Odom, John Zimmerman, Scott Davidoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Anind K. Dey, and Min Kyung Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 338--347. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2318008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Daniela Petrelli, Elise van den Hoven, and Steve Whittaker. 2009. Making history: intentional capture of future memories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1723--1732. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518966 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Maria Popova. 2015. Dear Data: Two Designers Visualize the Mundane Details of Daily Life in Magical Illustrated Postcards Mailed Across the Atlantic. Brain Pickings. 2015. Retrieved Sept 23rd 2015 from https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/03/19/dear-datagiorgia-lupi-stefanie-posavec/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Z. Pousman, J.T. Stasko, and M. Mateas. 2007. Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6: 1145--1152. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70541 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Stephen Purpura, Victoria Schwanda, Kaiton Williams, William Stubler, and Phoebe Sengers. 2011. Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 423--432. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1163--1172. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Minna Ruckenstein. 2014. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies 4, 1: 68--84. http://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Christian Rudder. 2014. Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One's Looking). Random House Incorporated. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Harvey Sacks. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Blackwell Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2863--2872. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. John Vines, Mark Blythe, Stephen Lindsay, Paul Dunphy, Andrew Monk, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1169--1178. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208567 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. John Vines, Tess Denman-Cleaver, Paul Dunphy, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Experience design theatre: exploring the role of live theatre in scaffolding design dialogues. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 683--692. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2556960 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Ron Wakkary, Audrey Desjardins, Sabrina Hauser, and Leah Maestri. 2008. A Sustainable Design Fiction: Green Practices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 4: 23:1--23:34. http://doi.org/10.1145/2494265 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Rebecca D. Watkins, Abigail Sellen, and Siân E. Lindley. 2015. Digital Collections and Digital Collecting Practices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3423--3432. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702380 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Gary Wolf. 2010. The data-driven life. The NY Times 28. Retrieved Sept 23rd, 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02selfmeasurement-t.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2004. Technology as experience. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Rebecca Xiong and Judith Donath. 1999. PeopleGarden: creating data portraits for users. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '99). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 37--44. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/320719.322581 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Xuan Zhao and Siân E. Lindley. 2014. Curation through use: understanding the personal value of social media. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2431--2440. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557291 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader