skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858123acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wikipedia articles about places, OpenStreetMap features, and other forms of peer-produced content have become critical sources of geographic knowledge for humans and intelligent technologies. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of the peer production model across the rural/urban divide, a divide that has been shown to be an important factor in many online social systems. We find that in both Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap, peer-produced content about rural areas is of systematically lower quality, is less likely to have been produced by contributors who focus on the local area, and is more likely to have been generated by automated software agents (i.e. "bots"). We then codify the systemic challenges inherent to characterizing rural phenomena through peer production and discuss potential solutions.

References

  1. Sisay F. Adafre and Maarten de Rijke. 2006. Finding Similar Sentences Across Multiple Languages in Wikipedia. 62--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Luc Anselin. 2005. Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: A Workbook. Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Judd Antin, Ed H. Chi, James Howison, Sharoda Paul, Aaron Shaw, and Jude Yew. 2011. Apples to Oranges?: Comparing Across Studies of Open Collaboration/Peer Production. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, ACM, 227--228. http://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038610 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gavin Bailey, Bernie Hogan, Mark Graham, and Ahmed Medhat Mohammed. 2012. Interactive Mapping of Wikipedia's Geographies: Visualizing Variation in Participation and Representation. WikiSym '12: 8th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Roger Bivand, Micah Altman, Luc Anselin, et al. 2015. spdep: Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/spdep/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Philip Bump. 2014. There really are two Americas. An urban one and a rural one. The Washington Post. Retrieved September 23, 2015 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/thefix/wp/2014/10/21/there-really-are-two-americas-aurban-one-and-a-rural-one/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jessica L. Collins and Barry Wellman. 2010. Small Town in the Internet Society: Chapleau Is No Longer an Island. American Behavioral Scientist 53, 9: 1344--1366. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210361689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Melanie Eckle. Quality Assessment of Remote Mapping in OpenStreetMap for Disaster Management Purposes. Retrieved September 24, 2015 from http://iscram2015.uia.no/wpcontent/uploads/2015/05/5--1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarah Elwood, Michael F. Goodchild, and Daniel Z. Sui. 2012. Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102, 3: 571--590. http://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.595657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Maike Erdmann, Kotaro Nakayama, Takahiro Hara, and Shojiro Nishio. 2008. An Approach for Extracting Bilingual Terminology from Wikipedia. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Jayant R. Haritsa, Ramamohanarao Kotagiri and Vikram Pudi (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 380--392. Retrieved May 4, 2014 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--54078568--2_28 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Erdmann, K. Nakayama, T. Hara, and S. Nishio. 2008. A bilingual dictionary extracted from the Wikipedia link structure. Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 686--689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Killian Fox. 2012. OpenStreetMap: "It's the Wikipedia of maps". The Guardian. Retrieved May 13, 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2012/feb/18/ openstreetmap-world-map-radicalsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Evgeniy Gabrilovich and Shaul Markovitch. 2006. Overcoming the brittleness bottleneck using wikipedia: enhancing text categorization with encyclopedic knowledge. AAAI '06: The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, 1301--1306. Retrieved February 16, 2012 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1597348.1597395 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Evgeniy Gabrilovich and Shaul Markovitch. 2007. Computing Semantic Relatedness using Wikipediabased Explicit Semantic Analysis. IJCAI '07: Twentieth Joint Conference for Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Stuart Geiger. 2014. Bots, bespoke, code and the materiality of software platforms. Information, Communication & Society 17, 3: 342--356. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.873069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Stuart Geiger and Aaron Halfaker. 2013. When the Levee Breaks: Without Bots, What Happens to Wikipedia's Quality Control Processes' Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, ACM, 6:1--6:6. http://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491061 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eric Gilbert, Karrie Karahalios, and Christian Sandvig. 2008. The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1603--1612. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357304 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mark Graham, Scott A. Hale, and Monica Stephens. 2011. Geographies of the World's Knowledge. Convoco! Edition, London, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mark Graham, Ralph K. Straumann, and Bernie Hogan. 2015. Digital Divisions of Labor and Informational Magnetism: Mapping Participation in Wikipedia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 0, 0: 1--21. http://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1072791Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mark Graham, Matthew Zook, and Andrew Boulton. 2013. Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 3: 464--479. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475--5661.2012.00539.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu. Is Wikipedia Biased? American Economic Review 102, 3: 343--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mordechai (Muki) Haklay, Sofia Basiouka, Vyron Antoniou, and Aamer Ather. 2010. How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus? Law to Volunteered Geographic Information. The Cartographic Journal 47, 4: 315--322. http://doi.org/10.1179/000870410X12911304958827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Muki Haklay. 2012. Nobody wants to do council estates? -- digital divide, spatial justice and outliers. AAG '12: 2012 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/mukih/nobody-wants-to-docouncil-estates-digital-divide-spatial-justice-andoutliers?ref=http://povesham.wordpress.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, Robert Kraut, and John Riedl. 2009. A Jury of Your Peers: Quality, Experience and Ownership in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, ACM, 15:1--15:10. http://doi.org/10.1145/1641309.1641332 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Aaron Halfaker and John Riedl. 2012. Bots and Cyborgs: Wikipedia's Immune System. Computer 45, 79--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Darren Hardy, James Frew, and Michael F. Goodchild. 2012. Volunteered geographic information production as a spatial process. International Journal of Geographical Information Science: 1--22. http://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.629618 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Brent Hecht. 2013. The Mining and Application of Diverse Cultural Perspectives in User-Generated Content. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Brent Hecht and Darren Gergle. 2009. Measuring SelfFocus Bias in Community-Maintained Knowledge Repositories. Communities and Technologies 2009: 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Brent Hecht and Darren Gergle. 2010. On The "Localness" of User-Generated Content. CSCW '10: 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 229--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Brent Hecht and Darren Gergle. 2011. A Beginner's Guide to Geographic Virtual Communities Research. In Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena. IGI Global, 333--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Brent Hecht and Shashi Shekhar. 2014. Spatial Computing Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Coursera. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/course/spatialcomputingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Brent Hecht and Monica Stephens. 2014. A Tale of Cities: Urban Biases in Volunteered Geographic Information. ICWSM '14: Eight International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Nathan Ingraham. 2012. Apple using TomTom and OpenStreetMap data in iOS 6 Maps app. The Verge. Retrieved September 11, 2012 from http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/11/3078987/appletomtom-openstreemap-ios-6-maps-appGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. DD Ingram and SF Franco. 2012. Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm #documentationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Brian C. Keegan and Jed R. Brubaker. 2015. "Is" to "Was": Coordination and Commemoration in Posthumous Activity on Wikipedia Biographies. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 533--546. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Aniket Kittur and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 37--46. http://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460572 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ronald R Kline. 2002. Consumers in the country: technology and social change in rural america. Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. S.K. Lam, A. Uduwage, Z. Dong, et al. 2011. WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance. WikiSym '11: 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Michael D. Lieberman and J. Lin. 2009. You Are Where You Edit: Locating Wikipedia Users Through Edit Histories. ICWSM '09: 3rd Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Andrew Lih. 2009. The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. Hyperion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Linna Li, Michael F. Goodchild, and Bo Xu. 2013. Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40, 2: 61--77. http://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.777139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Magnus Manske. 2015. Reasonator - Meta. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ReasonatorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Afra Mashhadi, Giovanni Quattrone, and Licia Capra. 2013. Putting ubiquitous crowd-sourcing into context. CSCW '13: 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 611--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Olena Medelyan, David Milne, Catherine Legg, and Ian H. Witten. 2009. Mining meaning from Wikipedia. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 9: 716--754. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.05.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 207--210. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702514 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. David Milne and Ian H Witten. 2008. Learning to link with wikipedia. CIKM '08: 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, 509--518. http://doi.org/10.1145/1458082.1458150 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. David Milne and Ian H Witten. 2008. An Effective, Low-Cost Measure of Semantic Relatedness Obtained from Wikipedia Links. WIKIAI '08: First AAAI Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation. 2002. Surveying and Mapping Law of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from http://en.nasg.gov.cn/article/Lawsandregulations/2013 12/20131200005471.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Ulrike Pfeil, Panayiotis Zaphiris, and Chee Siang Ang. 2006. Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1: 88--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Ingmar Poese, Steve Uhlig, Mohamed Ali Kaafar, Benoit Donnet, and Bamba Gueye. 2011. IP geolocation databases: Unreliable? SIGCOMM 41, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Giovanni Quattrone, Licia Capra, and Pasquale De Meo. 2015. There's No Such Thing as the Perfect Map: Quantifying Bias in Spatial Crowd-sourcing Datasets. CSCW '15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Giovanni Quattrone, Afra Mashhadi, Daniele Quercia, C. Smith, and Licia Capra. 2014. Modelling Growth of Urban Crowd-Sourced Information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. G. Quattrone, Afra Mashhadi, and Licia Capra. 2014. Mind the Map: The Impact of Culture and Economic Affluence on Crowd- Mapping Behaviours. CSCW '14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Eric S. Raymond. 2001. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly Media, Beijing?; Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Joseph Reagle and Lauren Rhue. 2011. Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication 5: 1138--1158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Shilad Sen, Toby Jia-Jun Li, WikiBrain Team, and Brent Hecht. 2014. WikiBrain: Democratizing Computation on Wikipedia. Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration, ACM, 27:1--27:10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641615 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Shilad W. Sen, Heather Ford, David R. Musicant, Mark Graham, Oliver S.B. Keyes, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Barriers to the Localness of Volunteered Geographic Information. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 197--206. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702170 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. C.E. Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, The 27, 3: 379--423. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.15387305.1948.tb01338.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Terry Sicular, Yue Ximing, Björn Gustafsson, and Li Shi. 2007. The Urban-Rural Income Gap and Inequality in China. Review of Income and Wealth 53, 1: 93--126. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.14754991.2007.00219.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Monica Stephens. 2013. Gender and the GeoWeb: divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal: 1--16. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013--9492-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Besiki Stvilia, Michael B. Twidale, Linda C. Smith, and Les Gasser. 2008. Information quality work organization in wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6: 983--1001. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20813 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. US Census Bureau. 2010 Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria. Retrieved September 11, 2013 from http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural2010.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, and Markus Strohmaier. 2015. It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia. Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved September 21, 2015 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15 /paper/view/10585Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Morten Warncke-Wang, Vlad Ayukaev, Brent Hecht, and Loren Terveen. 2015. The Success and Failure of Quality Improvement Projects in Peer Production Communities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Morten Warncke-Wang, Dan Cosley, and John Riedl. 2013. Tell Me More: An Actionable Quality Model for Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, ACM, 8:1--8:10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491063 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Morten Warncke-Wang, Vivek Ranjan, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Misalignment Between Supply and Demand of Quality Content in Peer Production Communities. ICWSM 2015: Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Richard Weait. 2010. Wolfram Alpha is using OpenStreetMap data. OpenStreetMap Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2010/06/16/wolframalpha-is-using-openstreetmap-data/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Wikimedia Foundation. WikiWomen's Collaborative Meta. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomen%27s_Co llaborativeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Benjamin P. Wing and Jason Baldridge. 2011. Simple Supervised Document Geolocation with Geodesic Grids. ACL '11: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 955--964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Jiang Yang, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, Lada A. Adamic, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2011. Culture Matters: A Survey Study of Social Q&A Behavior. ICWSM '11: 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Dennis Zielstra, Hartwig H. Hochmair, and Pascal Neis. 2013. Assessing the Effect of Data Imports on the Completeness of OpenStreetMap -- A United States Case Study. Transactions in GIS 17, 3: 315--334. http://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Dennis Zielstra, Hartwig Hochmair, Pascal Neis, and Francesco Tonini. 2014. Areal Delineation of Home Regions from Contribution and Editing Patterns in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation 3, 4: 1211--1233. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3041211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Dennis Zielstra and Alexander Zipf. 2010. A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science. Retrieved May 23, 2015 from http://agile2010.dsi.uminho.pt/pen/shortpapers_pdf/14 2_doc.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. 2012. foursquare is joining the OpenStreetMap movement! Say hi to pretty new maps! foursquare blog. Retrieved September 15, 2012 from http://blog.foursquare.com/2012/02/29/foursquare-isjoining-the-openstreetmap-movement-say-hi-to-prettynew-maps/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. 2015. Template:Grading scheme. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved September 23, 2015 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:G rading_scheme&oldid=654786473Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. 2015. Wikipedia:Pokémon test. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia: Pok%C3%A9mon_test&oldid=677970811Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. USDA Economic Research Service - Population & Migration. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economypopulation/population-migration.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader