skip to main content
10.1145/2855321.2855353acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessment-driven course design foundational patterns

Published:08 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Assessment is one of the most important areas in education yet many university teachers are not trained in assessment strategies and the underlying principles. Assessment should be fair and relevant for the targeted learning outcomes. While these are honorable goals, the principles do not state how to achieve them. This is where patterns come to the rescue as they capture tested ways to ensure constructive alignment, a learning outcome oriented course design, and a clearly stated and communicated list of assessment criteria. The patterns presented in this paper have been mined by a group of practicing educators during the first EduPLoP. They are foundational assessment patterns and can be considered as entry point for more specific patterns on different assessment types.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Theory Into Practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baume, D. (2009) Writing and Using Good Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/publications/files/Learning_Outcomes.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., Warburton, S. (2015). Assessment-Driven Course Design - Fair Play Patterns. PLoP 2015 - 22nd Pattern Languages of Programs conference. Pittsburgh, PA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32 (3), 347364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs, J and Tang, C. (2011): Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill and Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloom, B. S., Hasting, T., Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Takashi Iba, and Taichi Isaku, "Holistic Pattern-Mining Patterns: A Pattern Language for Pattern Mining on a Holistic Approach," the 19th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP2012), Arizona, USA, Oct., 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Olson, D. (2008). Teaching Patterns: A Pattern Language for Improving the Quality of Instruction in Higher Education Settings. Utah State University. PhD thesisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Scriven, Michael (1967). "The methodology of evaluation". In Stake, R. E. Curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally. American Educational Research Association (monograph series on evaluation, no. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Assessment-driven course design foundational patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EuroPLoP '15: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
      July 2015
      714 pages
      ISBN:9781450338479
      DOI:10.1145/2855321

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate216of354submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader