skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deferral classification of evolving temporal dependent data streams

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data streams generated in real-time can be strongly temporally dependent. In this case, standard techniques where we suppose that class labels are not correlated may produce sub-optimal performance because the assumption is incorrect. To deal with this problem, we present in this paper a new algorithm to classify temporally correlated data based on deferral learning. This approach is suitable for learning over time-varying streams. We show how simple classifiers such as Naive Bayes can boost their performance using this new meta-learning methodology. We give an empirical validation of our new algorithm over several real and artificial datasets.

References

  1. A. Bifet, G. Holmes, R. Kirkby, and B. Pfahringer. MOA: Massive online analysis. J. of Mach. Learn. Res., 11:1601--1604, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Bifet, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, R. Kirkby, and R. Gavaldà. New ensemble methods for evolving data streams. In KDD, pages 139--148, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bifet, J. Read, I. Zliobaite, B. Pfahringer, and G. Holmes. Pitfalls in benchmarking data stream classification and how to avoid them. In ECMLPKDD, pages 465--479, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. E. P. Box and G. M. Jenkins. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Cukier. Data, data everywhere. The Economist Report, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Gama, P. Medas, G. Castillo, and P. Rodrigues. Learning with drift detection. In Proc. of the 7th Brazilian Symp. on Artificial Intelligence, SBIA, pages 286--295, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Harries. SPLICE-2 comparative evaluation: Electricity pricing. Tech. report, University of New South Wales, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Kolter and M. Maloof. Dynamic weighted majority: An ensemble method for drifting concepts. J. of Mach. Learn. Res., 8:2755--2790, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Ross, N. Adams, D. Tasoulis, and D. Hand. Exponentially weighted moving average charts for detecting concept drift. Pattern Recogn. Lett, 33:191--198, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Seber and C. Wild. Nonlinear Regression. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Wojnarski. Prediction of product quality in glass manufacturing process using LTF-A neural network.On Bagging and Nonlinear Estimation. Technical report, EUNITE Competition, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Zliobaite. How good is the electricity benchmark for evaluating concept drift adaptation. CoRR, abs/1301.3524, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deferral classification of evolving temporal dependent data streams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
      April 2016
      2360 pages
      ISBN:9781450337397
      DOI:10.1145/2851613

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader