skip to main content
10.1145/2843043.2843045acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilising bitemporal information for business process contingency management

Published:01 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In today's enterprise environment, business processes no longer operate in an isolated fashion, driven purely by human input. Instead, they exchange information across organisations as well as interacting directly with sensors and actuators in the Internet of Things. This means that traditional assumptions about processes having a "perfect" view of the world no longer hold as real world events affect prior plans. Critical decisions must be made based on temporal information of events which potentially lead to reconfiguration of business processes to provide the desired service within specified time limits. Currently, temporal aspects of business processes only consider events in a single time dimension. However, recent architectures such as modern database systems are starting to provide the capabilities for handling two time dimensions. In this paper, we investigate how the impact of a change in an event can be identified using bitemporal information from business events. We take into consideration the underlying data model as well as behaviour specifications in the form of artifact lifecycles. Identifying the impact will enable us to tailor appropriate process adaptions as a result of event time changes.

References

  1. L. Anselma, P. Terenziani, and R. Snodgrass. Valid-time indeterminacy in temporal relational databases: Semantics and representations. IEEE TKDE, 25(12):2880--2894, Dec 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Artikis, O. Etzion, Z. Feldman, and F. Fournier. Event processing under uncertainty. In Proc. DEBS, pages 32--43. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. M. Dijkman, M. Dumas, and C. Ouyang. Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology, 50(12): 1281--1294, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Eder, E. Panagos, H. Pozewaunig, and M. Rabinovich. Time management in workflow systems. In editor, Proc. BIS, pages 265--280. Springer, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Eder, E. Panagos, and M. Rabinovich. Time constraints in workflow systems. In Proc. CAiSE, volume 1626 of LNCS, pages 286--300. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Engel, O. Etzion, and Z. Feldman. A basic model for proactive event-driven computing. In Proc. DEBS 2012, pages 107--118. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Furche, G. Grasso, M. Huemer, C. Schallhart, and M. Schrefl. Bitemporal complex event processing of web event advertisements. In Proc. WISE 2013, volume 8181 of LNCS, pages 333--346. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Grossmann, M. Schrefl, and M. Stumptner. A conceptual modeling approach for web service composition supporting service re-configuration. In Proc. APCCM, pages 43--52, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Grossmann, M. Schrefl, and M. Stumptner. Design for service compatibility. Software & Systems Modeling, 12(3):489--515, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Kulkarni and J.-E. Michels. Temporal features in SQL: 2011. SIGMOD Rec., 41(3):34--43, Oct. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Lanz, B. Weber, and M. Reichert. Time patterns for process-aware information systems. Requirements Engineering, 19(2):113--141, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Nicola. Best practices: Temporal data management with DB2. Technical report, IBM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Object Management Group. Object Constraint Language 2.4, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. W. Paton and O. Díaz. Active database systems. ACM Comput. Surv., 31(1):63--103, Mar. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. O. P. Patri, V. S. Sorathia, A. V. Panangadan, and V. K. Prasanna. The process-oriented event model (poem): A conceptual model for industrial events. In Proc. DEBS, pages 154--165. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. L. Peterson. Petri nets. ACM Comput. Surv., 9(3):223--252, Sept. 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Pichler, M. Wenger, and J. Eder. Composing time-aware web service orchestrations. In Proc. CAiSE, volume 5565 of LNCS, pages 349--363. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Schrefl and M. Stumptner. Behavior-consistent specialization of object life cycles. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 11(1):92--148, Jan. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Snodgrass. Temporal databases. In Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, volume 639 of LNCS, pages 22--64. 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. J. Wieringa. Design methods for reactive systems: Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML. Elsevier, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Wondoh, G. Grossmann, D. Gasevic, M. Reichert, M. Schrefl, and M. Stumptner. Bitemporal support for business process contingency management. In Proc. in ER Workshops, volume 9382 of LNCS, pages 109--118. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Utilising bitemporal information for business process contingency management

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACSW '16: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
        February 2016
        654 pages
        ISBN:9781450340427
        DOI:10.1145/2843043

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 February 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ACSW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate77of172submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate204of424submissions,48%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader