Ravihansa Rajapakse
ABSTRACT
Designing individualized technologies to suit unique needs and wants of people can enhance their quality of life. This paper explores the challenges in bringing together different communities with the necessary skill sets to design such technologies for and with people with a disability. A collaborative approach involving a maker community, a disability services organization, and university staff and students was investigated through the theoretical lens of infrastructuring. Maker communities can potentially provide skilled and willing volunteers, while disability services organizations possess disability sector expertise and the university can contribute design expertise through its staff and students. While these parties complement each other, tensions can arise that require resolution. Through ethnography and co-design this study identified key tensions that arise in a collaboration including differences in motivations, the importance of sensitive and accurate need finding, managing expectations, and leveraging health and safety standards. Resolution of these tensions can lead the way to more sustainable collaborative projects.
- Agre, P. E., 1997. Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI. In Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond The Great Divide. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Bannon, L. J. & Ehn, P., 2012. Design matters in Participatory Design. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, pp. 37--63.Google Scholar
- Crabtree, A. et al., 2003. Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Proc. OzCHI 2014. pp. 4--13.Google Scholar
- Gaver, B., Dunne, T. & Pacenti, E., 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions, 6(1), pp.21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. (2001). Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. Ercim News, 47, 20--21.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. (2010). The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disability & Society, 25(4), 427--439.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hartmann, B., Doorley, S. & Klemmer, S. R., 2008. Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(3), pp.46--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hook, J. et al., 2014. A Study of the Challenges Related to DIY Assistive Technology in the Context of Children with Disabilities. In Designing Interactive Systems. pp. 597--606. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hsieh, G. et al., 2014. Personalizing Behavior Change Technologies. CHI EA 2014. ACM Press, pp. 107--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, S. J., Pompe, A. & Krieshok, G., 2012. Repair Worlds: Maintenance, Repair, and ICT for Development in Rural Namibia. Proc. CSCW 2012. ACM Press, pp. 107--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, R. et al., 2013. Embracing Calibration in Body Sensing: Using Self-tweaking to Enhance Ownership and Performance. Proc. UbiComp 2013. ACM Press, pp. 811--820. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirkpatrick, K., 2015. Using technology to help people. Communications of the ACM, 58(2), pp.21--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liamputtong, P. & Ezzy, D., 2000. Qualitative research methods, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Lindtner, S., Hertz, G. D. & Dourish, P., 2014. Emerging Sites of HCI Innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups and Incubators. Proc. CHI 2014. ACM Press, pp. 439--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcallister, M., 2012. Arduino For Disabilities. Arduino For Disabilities. Available at: http://arduinofordisabilities.wordpress.com/ {Accessed February 6, 2014}.Google Scholar
- Pipek, V. & Wulf, V., 2009. Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology - ProQuest. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, pp.447--473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robohand, 2013. Complete set of mechanical anatomically driven fingers by robohand. Available at: http://www.robohand.net/.Google Scholar
- Rosner, D. K. et al., 2013. Reclaiming Repair: Maintenance and Mending As Methods for Design. CHI EA 2013. ACM Press, pp. 3311--3314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanders, E. B.-N. & Stappers, P. J., 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), pp.5--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Star, S. L. & Bowker, G. C., 2006. How to infrastructure. In Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs. Sage.Google Scholar
- Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, K., 1996. Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), pp.111--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Visser, F. S. et al., 2005. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), pp.119--149.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wherton, J. et al., 2012. Designing assisted living technologies "in the wild": preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), p.188.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wobbrock, J. O. et al., 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 3(3), pp.1--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Collaborative Approach to Design Individualized Technologies with People with a Disability
Recommendations
Engaging IT Students in Co-Design with People with Intellectual Disability
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCurrent and emerging participative design practices are providing opportunities for people with intellectual disability to have a say in how technology can best support them and their individual needs. Yet technological experts and designers are not ...
Designing with people with disabilities: adapting best practices of DIY and organizational approaches
OzCHI '14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of DesignIndividualization of design is often necessary particularly when designing with people with disabilities. Maker communities, with their flexible Do-It-Yourself (DIY) practices, offer potential to support individualized and cost-effective product design. ...
Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn recent decades, great technological strides have been made toward enabling people who are blind to live independent, successful lives. However, there has been relatively little progress towards understanding the social, collaborative needs of this ...
Comments