skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838789acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Proxy Users, Use By Proxy: Mapping Forms of Intermediary Interaction

Published:07 December 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Within Human-Computer Interaction and Internet Studies there is a growing interest in non-users, which articulates the increasingly diverse modes of digital media engagement that slip between established categories of user/non-user, online/offline and self/other. In this paper we aim to build on these concerns and their disciplinary intersections to map emerging forms of computer interaction and social media participation that can be grouped together under the concept of proxy users -- intermediaries that act on behalf of others. This preliminary mapping work, surveying a number of research projects and studies involving the authors, begins to trace the diversity of agents, roles, contexts, and motivations of proxy users.

References

  1. Alper, M. Digital Youth with Disabilities. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barthel, R., Mackley, K. L., Hudson-Smith A., Karpovich, A., de Jode, M., and Speed, C. An Internet of Old Things as an Augmented Memory System. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 17 (2013), 321--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. boyd, d. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi, ed. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge (2010), 39--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brubaker, J. R., and Vertesi, J. Death and the Social Network. Proc. CHI 2010 Workshop on HCI at the End of Life: Understanding Death, Dying, and the Digital (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brubaker, J. R., Ananny, M., and Crawford, K. Departing Glances: A Sociotechnical Account of 'Leaving' Grindr. New Media & Society, DOI: 10.1177/1461444814542311Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ebert, R. TWEET! TWEET! TWEET! Robert Ebert's Journal. 11 June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallicano, T., Brett, K. and Hopp, T. Is Ghost Blogging Like Speechwriting? A survey of practitioners about the ethics of ghost blogging. Public Relations Journal, 7. 3 (2013), 1--41Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchinson, J. I Can Haz Likes: Cultural Intermediation to Facilitate "Petworking" M/C Journal 17, 2 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Karppi, T. 'Change Name To No One. Like People's Status': Facebook Trolling and Managing Online Personas. Fibreculture Journal 22 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleenman, J. Web Immortality: The Social Media Sites that Keep You Alive in the Digital World. The Guardian, 7 June, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., Wilken, R., and Gibbs, M. Digital Housekeepers and Digital Expertise in the Networked Home. Convergence 21, 4 (2015), 408--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar, P., and Schoenebeck, S. The Modern Day Baby Book: Enacting Good Mothering and Stewarding Privacy on Facebook. Proceedings of CSCW 2015, March 14-18, Vancouver, Canada (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Light, B. and Cassidy, E. Strategies or the Suspension and Prevention of Disconnection: Rendering Disconnection as Socioecenomic Lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society 16, 7 (2014), 1169--1184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marwick, A. and boyd, d. To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter. Convergence 17, 2 (2011), 139--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Meese, J., Gibbs, M., Carter, M., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., Kohn, T. Selfies at Funerals: Mourning and Presencing on Social Media Platforms. International Journal of Communication 9 (2015), 1818--1831.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nansen, B. Accidental, Assisted, Automated: An Emerging Repertoire of Infant Mobile Media Techniques. M/C Journal 18, 5 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nansen, B., and Jayamene, D. Infants, Interfaces, and Intermediation: Digital Parenting in the Production of 'iPad Baby' YouTube Videos. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media (forthcoming).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nansen, B., Arnold, M., Wilken, R., and Gibbs, M. Users and Non-Users of Next Generation Broadband. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., and Banks, R. Passing On & Putting To Rest: Understanding Bereavement in the Context of Interactive Technologies. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (2010), 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Papacharissi, Z. The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Characteristics of Personal Home Pages. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 3 (2002), 643--660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Park, S., Middleton, C., and Allen, M. Conceptualizing the (Non) Users of the Internet. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Portwood-Stacer, L. Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention. New Media & Society 15, 7 (2013), 1041--1057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ronson, J. So You've Been Publicly Shamed. Pan Macmillan, London (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Russell, N. Death and Life in Cyberspace. Sunday Star Times, 11 March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Satchell, C. and Dourish, P. Beyond the User: Use and Non-Use in HCI. In Proc. OZCHI 2009, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Selwyn, N. Exploring the Role of Children in Adults' Adoption and Use of Computers. Information Technology & People 17, 1 (2004), 53--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tolmie P., Crabtree A., Rodden T., et al. Making the Home Network at Home: Digital Housekeeping. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Warschauer, M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wyatt, S. Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet. In Pinch and Oudshoorn, eds. How Users Matter. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003), 67--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Proxy Users, Use By Proxy: Mapping Forms of Intermediary Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
      December 2015
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450336734
      DOI:10.1145/2838739

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 December 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate47of97submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader