skip to main content
10.1145/2834976.2834982acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experiences in using os-level virtualization for block I/O

Published:15 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, HPC clusters commonly use Resource Management Systems such as PBS and TORQUE to share physical resources. These systems enable resources to be shared by assigning nodes to users exclusively in non-overlapping time slots. With virtualization technology, users can run their applications on the same node with low mutual interference. However, the overhead introduced by the virtual machine monitor or hypervisor is too high to be accepted, because efficiency is key to many HPC applications. OS-level virtualization (such as Linux Containers) offers a lightweight virtualization layer, which promises a near-native performance and is adopted by some BigData resource sharing platforms such as Mesos. Nevertheless, OS-level virtualization's overhead and isolation on block devices have not been completely evaluated, especially when applied to a shared distributed/parallel file system (D/PFS) such as HDFS or Lustre. In this paper, we thoroughly evaluate the overhead and isolation involved in sharing block I/O via OS-level virtualization on the local disk and D/PFSs. Meanwhile, to assign D/PFS storage resources to users, a middleware system is proposed and implemented to bridge the configuration gap between virtual clusters and remote D/PFSs.

References

  1. Docker, https://www.docker.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. KVM. http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Linux container, https://linuxcontainers.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lustre filesystem. http://www.lustre.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. MPI-IO Test. http://institute.lanl.gov/data/software/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Openvz, http://www.openvz.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paraview, http://www.paraview.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. TORQUE Resource Manager http://www.adaptivecomputing.com/products/open-source/torque/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vmware, http://www.vmware.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Xen, http://www.xenproject.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhruba Borthaku. The Hadoop Distributed File System: Architecture and Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. Mapreduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. In USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Garth Gibson, Gary Grider, Andree Jacobson, and Wyatt Lloyd. Probe: A thousand-node experimental cluster for computer systems research. USENIX; login, 38(3), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Benjamin Hindman, Andy Konwinski, Matei Zaharia, Ali Ghodsi, Anthony D. Joseph, Randy Katz, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica. Mesos: a platform for fine-grained resource sharing in the data center. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation, NSDI'11, pages 22--22, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nikolaus Huber, Marcel von Quast, Michael Hauck, and Samuel Kounev. Evaluating and modeling virtualization performance overhead for cloud environments. In CLOSER, pages 563--573, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Junbin Kang, Benlong Zhang, Tianyu Wo, Chunming Hu, and Jinpeng Huai. Multilanes: providing virtualized storage for os-level virtualization on many cores. In FAST, pages 317--329, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mingliang Liu, Ye Jin, Jidong Zhai, Yan Zhai, Qianqian Shi, Xiaosong Ma, and Wenguang Chen. Acic: automatic cloud i/o configurator for hpc applications. In High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), 2013 International Conference for, pages 1--12. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shuangcheng Niu, Jidong Zhai, Xiaosong Ma, Xiongchao Tang, and Wenguang Chen. Cost-effective cloud hpc resource provisioning by building semi-elastic virtual clusters. In High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), 2013 International Conference for, pages 1--12. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jongse Park, Daewoo Lee, Bokyeong Kim, Jaehyuk Huh, and Seungryoul Maeng. Locality-aware dynamic vm reconfiguration on mapreduce clouds. In Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing, pages 27--36. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Stephen Soltesz, Herbert Pötzl, Marc E Fiuczynski, Andy Bavier, and Larry Peterson. Container-based operating system virtualization: a scalable, high-performance alternative to hypervisors. In ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, volume 41, pages 275--287. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tom White. Hadoop: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly Media, original edition, June 2009, ISBN: 0596521979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Miguel G Xavier, Marcelo Veiga Neves, Fabio D Rossi, Tiago C Ferreto, Timoteo Lange, and Cesar AF De Rose. Performance evaluation of container-based virtualization for high performance computing environments. In Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on, pages 233--240. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PDSW '15: Proceedings of the 10th Parallel Data Storage Workshop
    November 2015
    59 pages
    ISBN:9781450340083
    DOI:10.1145/2834976

    Copyright © 2015 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 November 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    PDSW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate9of25submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate17of41submissions,41%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader