skip to main content
research-article

Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms: Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users

Published:18 March 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) become more diffuse, developers and designers need to consider a growing diversity of users including people with disabilities and aging populations. As a result, computing education needs to respond by providing students opportunities to learn about accessibility and designing for inclusion. This article presents results of a qualitative research study of practices in teaching accessibility in university-level programs in the US. The study included interviews with 18 professors from some of the top universities in the US and a content analysis of syllabi and other teaching materials. Using the pedagogical theory of authentic learning and elements from the 21st Century Skills framework, we found that instructors emphasized the need for students to develop awareness and understanding for a diversity of ICT users through multiple different experiences; experiences that included research projects that directly involve users with disabilities, guest speakers, field trips, simulating disabilities, and the use of videos/movies. Additionally, instructors used multiple resources (e.g., research papers, online resources), in part, to offset the challenge that there is a perceived lack of a comprehensive textbook. Instructors also emphasized the importance of their individual initiative; that is, the inclusion of accessible topics or courses was often linked to a faculty member's research and/or personal commitment. This article contributes to a gap in the literature by disseminating and sharing different approaches to teaching accessibility across multiple instructors, courses, and campuses.

References

  1. Julio Abascal and Colette Nicolle. 2005. Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interact. Comput. 17, 5 (September 2005), 484--505. DOI:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.03.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Access Computer Knowledgebase. Retrieved on December 12, 2015 from http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/search-accesscomputing-knowledge-base.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Accessing Higher Ground. 2015. Retrieved on August 18, 2015 from http://accessinghigherground.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013. ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2534860Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlos Benavídez, Jose L. Fuertes, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez, and Loïc Martínez. 2006. Teaching web accessibility with “Contramano” and Hera. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer Berlin, 341--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gretchen Berland. 2007. Rolling. Presented by THIRTEEN and distributed by American Public Television. Available online at http://www.thirteen.org/rolling/thefilm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samual White, and Tom Yeh. 2010. VizWiz: Nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’10). ACM, New York, NY, 333--342. DOI:10.1145/1866029.1866080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Paul Ryan Bohman. 2012. Teaching Accessibility and Design-For-All in the Information and Communication Technology Curriculum: Three Case Studies of Universities in the United States, England, and Austria. Ph.D. dissertation. Utah State University, Logan, UT. UMI Order Number: AAT 3546296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sheryl E. Burgstahler and Rebecca C. Cory. 2010. Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alex Carmichael, Alan F. Newell, and Maggie Morgan. 2007. The efficacy of narrative video for raising awareness in ICT designers about older users’ requirements. Interact. Comput. 19 (2007), 587--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Albert M. Cook and Jan Miller Polgar. 2007. Cook and Hussey's Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (3rd. ed.). Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. EDeAN. 2007. Retrieved on August 26, 2015 from http://www.edean.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1257--1266. DOI:10.1145/1357054.1357250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Larry Goldberg. 2015. Teaching Accessibility: A Call to Action from the Tech Industry. Retrieved August 16, 2015 from http://yahooaccessibility.tumblr.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Billy Golfus. 1995. When Billy Broke his Head and Other Tales of Wonder. Distributed by Kartemquin Films.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dimitris Grammenos, Anthony Savidis, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2009. Designing universally accessible games. ACM Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 7, 1, Article 8 (Feb. 2009). DOI:10.1145/1486508.1486516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Peter Gregor, Anna Dickinson, Alison Macaffer, and Peter Andreasen. 2003. SeeWord—A personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British J. Educ. Technol. 34, 3 (2003), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1467--8535. DOI:10.1111/1467-8535.00331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Vicki L. Hanson. 2001. Web access for elderly citizens. In Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly (WUAUC’01). ACM, New York, NY, 14--18. DOI:10.1145/564526.564531Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Susan M. Harrison. 2005. Opening the eyes of those who can see to the world of those who can’t: A case study. SIGCSE Bull. 37, 1 (Feb. 2005), 22--26. DOI:10.1145/1047124.1047368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shawn Lawton Henry, Shadi Abou-Zahra, and Judy Brewer. 2014. The role of accessibility in a universal web. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (W4A’14). ACM, New York, NY, Article 17, 4. DOI:10.1145/2596695.2596719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shawn Lawton Henry. 2007. Just Ask: Integrating Accessibility Throughout Design. ET\Lawton, Madison, WI, 2007. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://www.uiaccess.com/JustAsk/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarah Horton. 2006. Access by Design. A Guide to Universal Usability for Web Designers. New Riders, Berkeley, CA. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780321311405/samplepages/032131140X.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Matt Huenerfauth and Vicki L. Hanson. 2009. Sign Language in the Interface: Access for Deaf Signers. In The Universal Access Handbook, C. Stephanidis (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 38-1--38-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. It's Our Story. 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2015 from https://sites.google.com/a/pinedafoundation.org/ios/home.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Simeon Keates. 2009. Motor Impairments and Universal Access. In The Universal Access Handbook, C. Stephanidis (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 5-1--5-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Suzette Keith and Gill Whitney. 2008. Bridging the gap between young designers and older users in an inclusive society. In Proceedings of The Good, The Bad and The Challenging: The User and The Future of ICT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Suzette Keith, Gill Whitney, and Andrea Petz. 2009. Design for All as Focus in European ICT Teaching and Training Activities. In Proceedings of INCLUDE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sri Kurniawan, Sonia Arteaga, and Robert Manduchi. 2010. A General Education Course on Universal Access, Disability, Technology and Society. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’10). ACM, New York, pp. 11--18. DOI:10.1145/1878803.1878808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jonathan Lazar. 2002. Integrating accessibility into the information systems curriculum. In Proceedings of the International Association for Computer Information Systems. 373--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonathan Lazar. 2011. Using community-based service projects to enhance undergraduate HCI education: 10 years of experience. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’11). ACM, New York, NY, 581--588. DOI:10.1145/1979742.1979653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jonathan Lazar, Daniel Goldstein, and Anne Taylor. 2015. Ensuring Digital Accessibility Through Process and Policy. Waltham, MA: Elsevier. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-800646-7.00008-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Clayton Lewis. 2009. Cognitive Disabilities. In The Universal Access Handbook, C. Stephanidis (Ed.). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 7_1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Blaise Liffick. 2005. An Adaptive Technologies Course in a CS Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 192--193. DOI:10.1145/1090785.1090825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Stephani Ludi. 2007. Introducing accessibility requirements through external stakeholder utilization in an undergraduate requirements engineering course. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 736--743.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Israel Martin-Escalona, Francisco Barcelo-Arroyo, and Enrica Zola. 2013. The introduction of a topic on accessibility in several engineering degrees. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE, 656--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Klaus Miesenberger and Daniela Ortner. 2006. Raising the expertise of web designers through training—The experience of BFWD—Accessible web design (Barrierefreies Webdesign) in Austria. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 2006. DOI:10.1007/11788713_38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Gary Moulton, Ladeana Huyler, Mark Levenson, and Janice Hertz. 2002. Accessible Technology in Today's Business. Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Roland Ossmann and Klaus Miesenberger. 2006. Guidelines for the development of accessible computer games. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 403--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2011. Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved December 9, 2015 from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Helen Petrie and Alistair D. Edwards. 2006. Inclusive design and assistive technology as part of the HCI curriculum. In Proceedings of HCI Educators Workshop 2006. pp. 23--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Mark Pilgram. 2002. Dive into Accessibility. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://diveintoaccessibility.info/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. G. Michael Poor, Laura M. Leventhal, Julie Barnes, Duke R. Hutchings, Paul Albee, and Laura Campbell. 2012. No user left behind: Including accessibility in student projects and the impact on CS students’ attitudes. Trans. Comput. Educ. 12, 2, Article 5 (April 2012), 22 pages. DOI:10.1145/2160547.2160548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Raising the Floor. 2011. Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII). Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://gpii.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Brian J. Rosmaita. 2006. Accessibility first! A new approach to web design. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’06). ACM, New York, NY, 270--274. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://academics.hamilton.edu/computer_science/brosmait/talks/2006-03-03/fp166-rosmaita.html. DOI:10.1145/1168987.1169053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lisa Schur, Douglas Kruse, Joseph Blasi, and Peter Blank. 2005. Corporate culture and the employment of people with disabilities. Behav. Sci. Law 23 (2005), 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. David Williamson Shaffer and Mitchel Resnick. “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 10, 2 (1999), 195--215. DOI:10.1016/j.jssr.2013.12.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kristen Shinohara and Josh Tenenberg. 2007. Observing Sara: A case study of a blind person's interactions with technology. In Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets’07). ACM, New York, NY, 171--178. DOI:10.1145/1296843.1296873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jared Smith. 2012. Experiences of Students with Disabilities. Retrieved August 18, 2015 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEFgnYktC7UGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Constantine Stephanidis (Ed). 2009. The Universal Access Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl/Taylor & Francis Group. DOI:10.1145/2461121.2461153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Matthew A. Stowe. 2000. Interpreting “Place of public accommodation” under Title III of the ADA: A technical determination with potentially broad civil rights implications. Duke Law J. 50 (2000), 297--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Teaching Accessibility. Retrieved August 18, 2015 from http://teachingaccessibility.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Bernie Trilling and Charles Fidel. 2009. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Frank Turner (Sponsor). 2015. Department of Disabilities—Study of Accessibility Concepts in Computer Science, Information Systems, and Information Technology Programs in Higher Education. Retrieved August 18, 2015 from http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2014RS/bills/hb/hb0396E.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. United Spinal Association. 2011. Disability Etiquette. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://www.unitedspinal.org/pdf/DisabilityEtiquette.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. United States Access Board. Section 508 Standards for Electronic and Information Technology. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards/section-508-standards.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Annalu Waller, Vicki L. Hanson, and David Sloan. 2009. Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets’09). ACM, New York, NY, 155--162. DOI:10.1145/1639642.1639670Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Ye Diana Wang. 2012. A holistic and pragmatic approach to teaching web accessibility in an undergraduate web design course. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE’12). ACM, New York, NY, 55--60. DOI:10.1145/2380552.2380568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. W3C's Web accessibility initiative (WCAG). Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. WebAIM: Web Accessibility in Mind. Retrieved April 3, 2015 from http://webaim.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Neil Williams. 1995. The comic book as a course book. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Gill Whitney and Suzette Keith. 2008. European Developments in the Design and Implementation of Training for eInclusion. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP’08), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5105, Klaus Miesenberger et al. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 156--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27. DOI:10.1145/1952383.1952384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms: Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
      ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 8, Issue 4
      May 2016
      80 pages
      ISSN:1936-7228
      EISSN:1936-7236
      DOI:10.1145/2905046
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 March 2016
      • Accepted: 1 January 2016
      • Revised: 1 December 2015
      • Received: 1 May 2015
      Published in taccess Volume 8, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader