skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2819960acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vulnerability, Sharing, and Privacy: Analyzing Art Therapy for Older Adults with Dementia

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Older adults are most often considered consumers of online information, but recent work highlights the importance of engaging older adults in content generation and online sharing. One context in which older adults generate and share content is art therapy for individuals with dementia. Our analysis draws on Altman's notion of privacy and territorial regions to understand what sharing means for this vulnerable population. This theoretical framing reveals the ways in which privacy is cooperatively negotiated, which is in contrast to the individualistic view of existing sharing systems; how older adults derive benefits from sharing depending on interaction with their audience; and how sharing fluctuates between a focus on the process of therapy versus the product depending on privacy needs. Our analysis contributes an understanding of the complex nature of sharing for vulnerable populations and offers design considerations for systems that support this practice.

References

  1. Irwin Altman. 1975. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alzheimer's Association. 2015. Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures. Retrieved May 7, 2015 from www.alz.org/facts/downloads/ff_quickfacts_2015.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tawfiq Ammari, Priya Kumar, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Managing Children's Online Identities: How Parents Decide What to Disclose About Their Children Online. Proc. of CHI '15, ACM, 1895–1904. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702325 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Renée L. Beard. 2012. Art therapies and dementia care: A systematic review. Dementia 11, 5: 633–656. http://doi.org/10.1177/1471301211421090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Scott Blunsden, Brandi Richards, Jen Boger, et al. 2009. Design and prototype of a device to engage cognitively disabled older adults in visual artwork. In Proc. of PETRA '09, ACM Press, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1145/1579114.1579162 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mark Blythe, Peter Wright, John Bowers, et al. 2010. Age and experience: ludic engagement in a residential care setting. In Proc. of DIS '10, ACM Press, 161–170. http://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A.J. Bernheim Brush, Kori M. Inkpen, and Kimberly Tee. 2008. SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. In Proc. of CSCW '08, ACM Press, 629–638. http://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460661 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rajarshi Chakraborty, Claire Vishik, and H Raghav Rao. 2013. Privacy Preserving Actions of Older Adults on Social Media: Exploring the Behavior of Opting out of Information Sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 55, 4: 948–956. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kathy Charmaz. 2008. Constructionism and the Grounded Theory Method. In Handbook of Constructionist Research, James A. Holstein and Jaber F. Gubrium (eds.). Guilford Press, 397–412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Raymundo Cornejo, Mónica Tentori, and Jesús Favela. 2013. Ambient Awareness to Strengthen the Family Social Network of Older Adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 22, 2-3: 309–344. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9166-2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Betsy van Dijk, Pavan Dadlani, Aart van Halteren, and Margit Biemans. 2010. Life changes, connection stays: photo sharing and social connectedness for people with special needs. Proc. of ECCE '10, ACM Press, 135– 142. http://doi.org/10.1145/1962300.1962327 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joan Morris DiMicco and David R Millen. Identity Management: Multiple Presentations of Self in Facebook. Proc. of GROUP '07, ACM, 383–386. http://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mary Galvin. 2013. Who Is The Vulnerable One? Proc. of CHI '13 Workshop on 'Designing for-and with- Vulnerable People.'Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Gregor, Alan F. Newell, and Mary Zajicek. 2002. Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In Proc of Assets '02, ACM Press, 151–156. http://doi.org/10.1145/638249.638277 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Greg Guest. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18, 1: 59–82. http://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nancy Harding and Colin Palfrey. 1997. The Social Construction of Dementia: Confused Professionals? Jessica Kingsley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. HIPPA Privacy Rule. 2007. 45 CFR. Parts 160, 164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jesse Hoey, Krists Zutis, Valerie Leuty, and Alex Mihailidis. 2010. A tool to promote prolonged engagement in art therapy: design and development from arts therapist requirements. In Proc. of ASSETS '10, ACM Press, 211–218. http://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878841 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nancy Van House, Marc Davis, Morgan Ames, Megan Finn, and Vijay Viswanathan. 2005. The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing. In Proc. of CHI '05, ACM Press, 1853–1856. http://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057039 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Institute for Dementia Research & Prevention. 2012. Dementia. Retrieved May 1, 2015 from http://idrp.pbrc.edu/faq.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sasa Junuzovic, Kori Inkpen, Tom Blank, and Anoop Gupta. 2012. IllumiShare: sharing any surface. In Proc. of CHI '12, ACM Press, 1919–1928. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208333 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Da-jung Kim and Youn-kyung Lim. 2015. Dwelling Places in KakaoTalk: Understanding the Roles and Meanings of Chatrooms in Mobile Instant Messengers. Proc. of CSCW '15, ACM Press, 775–784. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675198 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Helen B. Landgarten. 1981. Clinical Art Therapy: A Comprehensive Guide. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Siân E Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2008. Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proc. of BCS-HCI '08, British Computer Society, 77–86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Eden Litt, Erin Spottswood, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeff T. Hancock, Madeline E. Smith, and Lindsay Reynolds. 2014. Awkward encounters of an 'other' kind. Proc. of CSCW '14, ACM Press, 449–460. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alex Mihailidis, Scott Blunsden, Jennifer Boger, et al. 2010. Towards the development of a technology for art therapy and dementia: Definition of needs and design constraints. The Arts in Psychotherapy 37, 4: 293–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2010.05.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Peter J. Neumann, Sally S. Araki, and Elane M. Gutterman. 2000. The Use of Proxy Respondents in Studies of Older Adults: Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48, 12: 1646–1654. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03877.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sandra Petronio and Irwin Altman. 2002. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandra Petronio and Samantha Kovach. 1997. Managing privacy boundaries: Health providers' perceptions of resident care in Scottish nursing homes. Journal of Applied Communication Research 25, 2: 115–131. http://doi.org/10.1080/00909889709365470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Hayes Raffle, Cati Vaucelle, Ruibing Wang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Jabberstamp: embedding sound and voice in traditional drawings. Proc. of IDC '07, ACM Press, 137–144. http://doi.org/10.1145/1297277.1297306 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yvonne Rogers and Gary Marsden. 2013. Does He Take Sugar?: Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Compassion. interactions 20, 4: 48–57. http://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate L. Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. Proc. of CHI '14, ACM Press, 3913–3922. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Daniela K. Rosner and Kimiko Ryokai. 2010. Spyn: augmenting the creative and communicative potential of craft. Proc. of CHI '10, ACM Press, 2407–2416. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753691 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Susan L. Star and James. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3: 387–420. http://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellen Greene Stewart. 2004. Art Therapy and Neuroscience Blend: Working with Patients Who Have Dementia. Art Therapy 21, 3: 148–155. http://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2004.10129499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. John Vines, Róisín McNaney, Stephen Lindsay, Jayne Wallace, and John McCarthy. 2014. Special Topic: Designing for and with Vulnerable People. interactions 21, 1: 44–46. http://doi.org/10.1145/2543490 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jenny Waycott, Hilary Davis, Frank Vetere, et al. 2014. Captioned photographs in psychosocial aged care: relationship building and boundary work. Proc. of CHI '14, ACM Press, 4167–4176. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557290 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, et al. 2013. Older adults as digital content producers. Proc. of CHI '13, ACM Press, 39–48. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470662 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Pamela Wisniewski, A.K.M. Najmul Islam, Bart P. Knijnenburg, and Sameer Patil. 2015. Give Social Network Users the Privacy They Want. Proc. of CSCW '15, ACM Press, 1427–1441. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675256 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2016
    1866 pages
    ISBN:9781450335928
    DOI:10.1145/2818048

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader