skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2819940acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Not at the Dinner Table: Parents' and Children's Perspectives on Family Technology Rules

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parents and children both use technology actively and increasingly, but prior work shows that concerns about attention, family time, and family relationships abound. We conducted a survey with 249 parent-child pairs distributed across 40 U.S. states to understand the types of technology rules (also known as restrictive mediation) they have established in their family and how effective those rules are perceived to be. Our data robustly show that children (age 10-17) are more likely to follow rules that constrain technology activities (e.g., no Snapchat) than rules that constrain technology use in certain contexts (e.g., no phone at the dinner table). Children find context constraints harder to live up to, parents find them harder to enforce, and parents' most common challenge when trying to enforce such rules is that children -can't put it down.- This is consistent with the idea that banning certain technologies is currently easier than setting more nuanced boundaries. Parents and children agree that parents should also unplug when spending time with family, while children alone express frustration with the common parent practice of posting about children online. Together, our results suggest several mechanisms by which designers and families can improve parent-child relationships around technology use.

References

  1. Tawfiq Ammari, Priya Kumar, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Managing Children's Online Identities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1895–1904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1905–1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Networked empowerment on Facebook groups for parents of children with special needs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2805–2814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Erica Weintraub Austin. 1993. Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37, 2, 147–158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barna Group. 2011. The Family & Technology Report. Retrieved from https://www.barna.org/component/virtuemart/faithspirituality/the-family-technology-reportdetail?Itemid=0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R.T. Bower. 1973. Television and the public. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J Alison Bryant. 2001. Television and the American family. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J Van den Bulck and B Van den Bergh. 2000. The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children's media use: gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44, 3, 129–148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moira Burke and Robert Kraut. 2013. Using Facebook after losing a job. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference SIGCHI on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 1419-1430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Moira Burke, Cameron Marlow, and Thomas Lento. 2010. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '10), 1909. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sarah M. Coyne, Dean Busby, Brad J. Bushman, Douglas A. Gentile, Robert Ridge, and Laura Stockdale. 2012. Gaming in the Game of Love: Effects of Video Games on Conflict in Couples. Family Relations 61, 3, 388–396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Vauna Davis. 2012. Interconnected but underprotected? parents' methods and motivations for information seeking on digital safety issues. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking 15, 12, 669–74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Roger Jon Desmond, Jerome L. Singer, Dorothy G. Singer, Rachel Calam, and Karen Colimore. 1985. Family mediation patterns and television viewing. Human Communication Research 11, 4, 461–480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Matthew S. Eastin, Bradley S. Greenberg, and Linda Hofschire. 2006. Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication 56, 3, 486–504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dennis D Fehrenbacher and Burkhard Pedell. 2015. More than a screening device: the influence of selfselection on planned effort and fairness perception. Retrieved from https://www.business.unsw.edu.au/AboutSite/Schools-Site/Accounting-Site/Documents/DFehrenbacher-More-than-a-screening-device.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas A. Gentile, Amy I. Nathanson, Eric E. Rasmussen, Rachel A. Reimer, and David A. Walsh. 2012. Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media. Family Relations 61, 3, 470–487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Douglas A. Gentile, Rachel A. Reimer, Amy I. Nathanson, David A. Walsh, and Joey C. Eisenmann. 2014. Protective Effects of Parental Monitoring of Children's Media Use. JAMA Pediatrics, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas A. Gentile and David A. Walsh. 2002. A normative study of family media habits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 23, 2, 157–178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Elizabeth C. Hair, Kristin Anderson Moore, Sarah B. Garrett, Akemi Kinukawa, Laura H. Lippman, and Erik Michelson. 2005. The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale. In What Do Children Need to Flourish?, Kristin Anderson Moore and Laura H. Lippman (eds.). Springer US, 183–202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L Haran. 1995. Families together differently today. Advertising Age 66, 43, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellie Harmon and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the smartphone in everyday discourse: Conflict, tension & instability. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1051–1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Michael G Harvey and James T Rothe. 1986. Video cassette recorders-their impact on viewers and advertisers. Journal of Advertising Research 25, 6, 19–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yasmeen Hashish, Andrea Bunt, and James E Young. 2014. Involving Children in Content Control: A Collaborative and Education-oriented Content Filtering Approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), ACM, 1797–1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Meizi He, Leonard Piché, Charlene Beynon, and Stewart Harris. 2010. Screen-related sedentary behaviors: children's and parents' attitudes, motivations, and practices. Journal of nutrition education and behavior 42, 1, 17–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Hyewon Suh, Yi-Chen Sung, Charlotte P. Lee, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Texting while parenting: how adults use mobile phones when caring for children at the playground. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 727– 736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Itziar Hoyos Cillero and Russell Jago. 2010. Systematic review of correlates of screen-viewing among young children. Preventive Medicine 51, 1, 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mizuko Ito, Misa Matsuda, and Daisuke Okabe. 2005. Personal, portable, pedestrian: mobile phones in Japanese life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Carrie James and Henry Jenkins. 2014. Disconnected: Youth, New Media, and the Ethics Gap. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa and Karl R. Lang. 2005. Managing the Paradoxes of Mobile Technology. Information Systems Management 22, 4, 7–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Charlotte Johnston and Eric J. Mash. 1989. A Measure of Parenting Satisfaction and Efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 18, 2, 167–175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Priya Kumar and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. The Modern Day Baby Book. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '15), 1302–1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson. 2008. Grand theft childhood: the surprising truth about violent video games and what parents can do. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alexis R. Lauricella, Drew P. Cingel, Courtney Blackwell, Ellen Wartella, and Annie Conway. 2014. The mobile generation: youth and adolescent ownership and use of new media. Communication Research Reports 31, 4, 357–364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Amanda Lenhart. 2012. Cell phone ownership. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/19/cell-phoneownership/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Carolyn A. Lin and David J. Atkin. 1989. Parental mediation and rulemaking for adolescent use of television and VCRs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 33, 1, 53–67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sonia Livingstone and Moira Bovill. 2013. Children and their changing media environment: a European comparative study. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sonia Livingstone and Ellen J. Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children's Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, 4, 581–599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sonia Livingstone. 2007. From family television to bedroom culture: Young people's media at home. Media studies: Key issues and debates, 302–321.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. May O. Lwin, Andrea J. S. Stanaland, and Anthony D. Miyazaki. 2008. Protecting children's privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing 84, 2, 205– 217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Brandon T McDaniel and Sarah M Coyne. 2014. 'Technoference': the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kelly Mendoza. 2009. Surveying parental mediation: connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 28–41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Gustavo S. Mesch. 2009. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society. 12, 4, 387–393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Catherine A. Middleton. 2007. Illusions of balance and control in an always-on environment: a case study of BlackBerry users. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 21, 2, 165-178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Kimberly J. Mitchell, David Finkelhor, and Janis Wolak. 2005. Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software. Child Abuse and Neglect 29, 7, 753–765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2014. Social networking site use by mothers of young children. In Proceedings of the 17th annual SIGCHI conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '14), 1272–1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Margaret Morrison and Dean M. Krugman. 2001. A look at mass and computer mediated technologies: understanding the roles of television and computers in the home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 45, 1, 135–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Amy I. Nathanson and Mong-Shan Yang. 2003. The effects of mediation content and form on children's responses to violent television. Human Communication Research 29, 1, 111–134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Margaret K Nelson. 2010. Parenting out of control: anxious parents in uncertain times. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Amanda Noss (U.S. Census Bureau). 2014. Household Income: 2013. American Community Survey Briefs, 1– 6. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/pu blications/2014/acs/acsbr13-02.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Caroline Oates, Nicki Newman, and Anthanasia Tziortzi. 2014. Parents' beliefs about, and attitudes towards, marketing to children. In Advertising to Children: New Directions, New Media, Mark Blades, Caroline Oates, Fran Blumber and Barrie Gunter (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, 115–136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Jeneva L. Ohan, Debbie W. Leung, and Charlotte Johnston. 2000. The parenting sense of competence scale: evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 32, 4, 251–261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Roy Pea, Clifford Nass, Lyn Meheula, et al. 2012. Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental psychology 48, 2, 327–36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jenny S Radesky, Caroline J Kistin, Barry Zuckerman, et al. 2014. Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics 133, 4, e843–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Ernesto R. Ramirez, Gregory J. Norman, Dori E. Rosenberg, et al. 2011. Adolescent screen time and rules to limit screen time in the home. Journal of Adolescent Health 48, 4, 379–385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Daniel Romer, Zhanna Bagdasarov, and Eian More. 2013. Older versus newer media and the well-being of united states youth: results from a national longitudinal panel. Journal of Adolescent Health 52, 5, 613–619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Lawrence I. Rosenkoetter, Sharon E. Rosenkoetter, Rachel A. Ozretich, and Alan C. Acock. 2004. Mitigating the harmful effects of violent television. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25, 1, 25–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Marie Evans Schmidt, Jess Haines, Ashley O'Brien, et al. 2012. Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity 20, 7, 1338–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Deborah Schooler, Janna L. Kim, and Lynn Sorsoli. 2006. Setting rules or sitting down: Parental mediation of television consumption and adolescent self-esteem, body image, and sexuality. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 3, 4, 49–62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Aric Sigman. 2012. Time for a view on screen time. Archives of disease in childhood 97, 11, 935–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Charles Steinfield, Nicole B. Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6, 434–445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Sherry Turkle. 2012. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Joseph Turow and Andrea L Kavanaugh. 2003. The wired homestead: An MIT Press sourcebook on the Internet and the family. ERIC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Gill Valentine and Sarah Holloway. 2001. On-line dangers?: geographies of parents' fears for children's safety in cyberspace. The Professional Geographer 53, 1, 71–83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Patti M Valkenburg, Marina Krcmar, Allerd L Peeters, and Nies M Marseille. 1999. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: 'instructive mediation,' 'restrictive mediation,' and 'social coviewing.' Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, 1, 52–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. E. A. Vandewater. 2005. 'No--you can't watch that': parental rules and young children's media use. American Behavioral Scientist 48, 5, 608–623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, Troy E. Beckert, Sarah Tulane, and Clare V. Bird. 2014. 'They always ask what I'm doing and who I'm talking to': parental mediation of adolescent interactive technology use. Marriange and Family Review 50, 8, 691-713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Rong Wang, Suzanne M. Bianchi, and Sara B. Raley. 2005. Teenagers' Internet use and family rules: a research note. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 5, 1249–1258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Barbara J. Wilson. 2008. Media and children's aggression, fear, and altruism. Future of Children 18, 1, 87– 118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Adolescent online safety. In Proceedings of the 17th annual SIGCHI conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '14), 1258–1271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2011. Social and technical challenges in parenting teens' social media use. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 3237-3246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Parents on social media: Likes and dislikes of sharenting. Retrieved from http://mottnpch.org/reportssurveys/parents-social-media-likes-and-dislikessharentingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. 2010. The Decline of Marriage and Rise of New Families. Pew Research Report. Retrieved May 6, 2015 from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/11/pewsocial-trends-2010-families.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. 2011. Teens' parents and their technology profile. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/11/09/teens-parentsand-their-technology-profile/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. 2011. Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. Retrieved May 6, 2015 from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br02.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. 2014. Florida Passes New York to Become the Nation's Third Most Populous State, Census Bureau Reports. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2014/cb14-232.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2016
    1866 pages
    ISBN:9781450335928
    DOI:10.1145/2818048

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader