skip to main content
10.1145/2817721.2817748acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gesture Bike: Examining Projection Surfaces and Turn Signal Systems for Urban Cycling

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive surfaces could be employed in urban environments to make people more aware of moving vehicles, showing drivers' intentions and the subsequent position of vehicles. To explore the usage of projections while cycling, we created a system that displays a map for navigation and signals cyclist intention. The first experiment compared the task of map navigation on a display projected on a road surface in front of the bicycle with a head-up display (HUD) consisting of a projection on a windshield. The HUD system was considered safer and easier to use. In our second experiment, we used projected surfaces to implement concepts inspired by Gibson's perception theory of driving that were combined with detection of conventional cycling gestures to signal and visualize turning intention. The comparison of our system with an off-the-shelf turn signal system showed that gesture input was easier to use. A web-based follow-up study based on the recording of the two signalling systems from the perspective of participants in traffic showed that with the gesture-projector system it was easier to understand and predict the cyclist intention.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

its0226-file3.mp4

mp4

59.8 MB

References

  1. Roney, J. M., Earth Policy Institue. Bicycle production. http://www.earth-policy.org/indicators/C48 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) . Vienna convention on road traffic (with amendment 1), article 14, paragraph 3 (1968).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolstad, C. A., Cuevas, H. M., Wang-Costello, J., Endsley, M. R., and Angell, L. S. Measurement of situation awareness for automobile technologies of the future.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooke, E. Blaze bike light. www.kickstarter.com/ projects/embrooke/blaze-bike-light (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, B., and Laurier, E. The normal natural troubles of driving with gps. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 1621--1630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bycyklen. Copenhagen city bike. http://bycyklen.dk/en/ (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7. Carey, S. Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist 41, 10 (1986), 1123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Centre for Research and Contract Standardisation in Civil and Traffic Engineering, Netherlands. Design manual for bicycle traffic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Christmas, S., Helman, S., Buttress, S., Newman, C., and Hutchins, R. Cycling, safety and sharing the road: Qualitative research with cyclists and other road users. Dept. for Transport: London, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuang, K.-H., Hsu, C.-C., Lai, C.-H., Doong, J.-L., and Jeng, M.-C. The use of a quasi-naturalistic riding method to investigate bicyclists behaviors when motorists pass. Accident Analysis & Prevention 56 (2013), 32--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dancu, A., Franjcic, Z., and Fjeld, M. Smart flashlight: map navigation using a bike-mounted projector. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2014), 3627--3630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. de Waard, D., Schepers, P., Ormel, W., and Brookhuis, K. Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety. Ergonomics 53, 1 (2010), 30--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. European Commission. Updated european statement of principles on human machine interface for in-vehicle information and communication systems. In Official Journal of the European Union. - Brussel (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, J. J., and Crooks, L. E. A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving. The American journal of psychology (1938), 453--471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagel, B. E., Lamy, A., Rizkallah, J. W., Belton, K. L., Jhangri, G. S., Cherry, N., and Rowe, B. H. The prevalence and reliability of visibility aid and other risk factor data for uninjured cyclists and pedestrians in edmonton, alberta, canada. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39, 2 (2007), 284--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jaermark, S., Gregersen, N., and Linderoth, B. The use of bicycle lights. Stockholm: Transportfroskningsberedningen (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaguar. Virtual windscreen concept. https://youtu.be/FeK9IkSD_nI (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ji, S., Cherry, C. R., J. Bechle, M., Wu, Y., and Marshall, J. D. Electric vehicles in china: emissions and health impacts. Environmental science & technology 46, 4 (2012), 2018--2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kwan, I., and Mapstone, J. Visibility aids for pedestrians and cyclists: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Accident Analysis & Prevention 36, 3 (2004), 305--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20. Marshall, J., and Tennent, P. Mobile interaction does not exist. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 2069--2078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Matthews, M. D., and Beal, S. A. Assessing situation awareness in field training exercises. Tech. rep., DTIC Document, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, P., Wattrus, L., and Beemsingh, R. Hammerhead bike navigation. www.dragoninnovation.com/projects/23-hammerhead (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things. Basic books, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkin, J., and Meyers, C. The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42, 1 (2010), 159--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., and Boll, S. Tacticycle: Supporting exploratory bicycle trips. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM (2012), 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pucher, J., and Buehler, R. City cycling. MIT Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Reddy, S., Shilton, K., Denisov, G., Cenizal, C., Estrin, D., and Srivastava, M. Biketastic: sensing and mapping for better biking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2010), 1817--1820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2005), 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rowland, D., Flintham, M., Oppermann, L., Marshall, J., Chamberlain, A., Koleva, B., Benford, S., and Perez, C. Ubikequitous computing: designing interactive experiences for cyclists. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM (2009), 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Saffer, D. Designing gestural interfaces: Touchscreens and interactive devices. -- O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Thornley, S., Woodward, A., Langley, J. D., Ameratunga, S. N., and Rodgers, A. Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the taupo bicycle study. Injury Prevention 14, 1 (2008), 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Vorhies, Z. Zackees turn signal gloves. www.kickstarter.com/projects/zackees/ zackees-turn-signal-gloves (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker, I., Garrard, I., and Jowitt, F. The influence of a bicycle commuter's appearance on drivers overtaking proximities: an on-road test of bicyclist stereotypes, high-visibility clothing and safety aids in the united kingdom. Accident Analysis & Prevention 64 (2014), 69--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Walmink, W., Chatham, A., and Mueller, F. Interaction opportunities around helmet design. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 367--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Walmink, W., Wilde, D., and Mueller, F. F. Displaying heart rate data on a bicycle helmet to support social exertion experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, TEI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wickens, C. D. Oxford handbooks online. attention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, S. Bicycle technology. Scientific American 228, 3 (1973).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Xfire. Bike lane safety light. http://thexfire.com/products-page/ lighting-system/bike-lane-safety-light (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Gesture Bike: Examining Projection Surfaces and Turn Signal Systems for Urban Cycling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces
      November 2015
      522 pages
      ISBN:9781450338998
      DOI:10.1145/2817721

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate29of122submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader