skip to main content
10.1145/2807442.2807497acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Virtual Replicas for Remote Assistance in Virtual and Augmented Reality

Published:05 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many complex tasks, a remote subject-matter expert may need to assist a local user to guide actions on objects in the local user's environment. However, effective spatial referencing and action demonstration in a remote physical environment can be challenging. We introduce two approaches that use Virtual Reality (VR) or Augmented Reality (AR) for the remote expert, and AR for the local user, each wearing a stereo head-worn display. Both approaches allow the expert to create and manipulate virtual replicas of physical objects in the local environment to refer to parts of those physical objects and to indicate actions on them. This can be especially useful for parts that are occluded or difficult to access. In one approach, the expert points in 3D to portions of virtual replicas to annotate them. In another approach, the expert demonstrates actions in 3D by manipulating virtual replicas, supported by constraints and annotations. We performed a user study of a 6DOF alignment task, a key operation in many physical task domains, comparing both approaches to an approach in which the expert uses a 2D tablet-based drawing system similar to ones developed for prior work on remote assistance. The study showed the 3D demonstration approach to be faster than the others. In addition, the 3D pointing approach was faster than the 2D tablet in the case of a highly trained expert.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p405.mp4

mp4

78 MB

References

  1. M. Adcock, D. Ranatunga, R. Smith, and B.H. Thomas. 2014. Object-Based Touch Manipulation for Remote Guidance of Physical Tasks. In Proc. ACM SUI. 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bauer, G. Kortuem, and Z. Segall. 1999. "Where Are You Pointing At?" A Study of Remote Collaboration in a Wearable Video conference System. In Proc. IEEE ISWC. 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bottecchia, J. Cieutat, and J. Jessel. 2010. T.A.C: Augmented Reality System for Collaborative Tele-assistance in the Field of Maintenance Through Internet. In Proc. ACM AH. 14:1--14:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Chastine, K. Nagel, Y. Zhu, and M. Hudachek-Buswell. 2008. Studies on the Effectiveness of Virtual Pointers in Collaborative Augmented Reality. In Proc. IEEE 3DUI. 117--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Gauglitz, B. Nuernberger, M. Turk, and T. Hollerer. 2014. World-Stabilized Annotations And Virtual Scene Navigation For Remote Collaboration. In Proc. ACM UIST. 449--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Goto, Y. Uematsu, H. Saito, S. Senda, and A Iketani. 2010. Task Support System by Displaying Instructional Video Onto AR Workspace. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 83--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Heiser, B. Tversky, and M. Silverman. 2004. Sketches for and from Collaboration. Visual and spatial reasoning in design III 3 (2004), 69--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Henderson and S. Feiner. 2011. Augmented Reality in the Psychomotor Phase of a Procedural Task. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Kim, G. Lee, N. Sakata, and M. Billinghurst. 2014. Improving Co-Presence with Augmented Visual Communication Cues for Sharing Experience through Video Conference. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 83--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D.S. Kirk and D.S. Fraser. 2005. The Effects of Remote Gesturing on Distance Instruction. In Proc. CSCL. 301--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Kurata, N. Sakata, M. Kourogi, H. Kuzuoka, and M. Billinghurst. 2004. Remote Collaboration Using a Shoulder-Worn Active Camera/laser. In Proc. IEEE ISWC, Vol. 1. 62--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Kurillo, R. Bajcsy, K. Nahrsted, and O. Kreylos. 2008. Immersive 3D Environment for Remote Collaboration and Training of Physical Activities. In Proc. IEEE VR. 269--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Kuzuoka. 1992. Spatial Workspace Collaboration: A SharedView Video Support System for Remote Collaboration Capability. In Proc. ACM CHI. 533--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Lanir, R. Stone, B. Cohen, and P. Gurevich. 2013. Ownership and Control of Point of View in Remote Assistance. In Proc. ACM CHI. 2243--2252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R.A. Newcombe, S. Izadi, O. Hilliges, D. Molyneaux, D. Kim, A.J. Davison, P. Kohli, J. Shotton, S. Hodges, and A. Fitzgibbon. 2011. KinectFusion: Real-time Dense Surface Mapping and Tracking. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. O. Oda and S. Feiner. 2015. Goblin XNA Framework. (2015). http://goblinxna.codeplex.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J.S. Pierce, B.C. Stearns, and R. Pausch. 1999. Voodoo Dolls: Seamless Interaction at Multiple Scales in Virtual Environments. In Proc. ACM i3D. 141--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Piumsomboon, D. Altimira, H. Kim, A. Clark, G. Lee, and M. Billinghurst. 2014. Grasp-Shell vs Gesture-Speech: A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Natural Interaction Techniques in Augmented Reality. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero. 2004. The Mirror-Neuron System. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27 (2004), 169--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. N. Sakata, T. Kurata, and H. Kuzuoka. 2006. Visual Assist with a Laser Pointer and Wearable Display for Remote Collaboration. In Proc CollabTech. 66--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. I. Sipiran and B. Bustos. 2011. Harris 3D: A Robust Extension of the Harris Operator for Interest Point Detection on 3D Meshes. Vis. Comput. 27, 11 (2011), 963--976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R.S. Sodhi, B.R. Jones, D. Forsyth, B.P. Bailey, and G. Maciocci. 2013. BeThere: 3D Mobile Collaboration with Spatial Input. In Proc. ACM CHI. 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Stafford and W. Piekarski. 2008. User Evaluation of God-like Interaction Techniques. In Proc. AUIC. 19--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Tait and M. Billinghurst. 2014. View independence in remote collaboration using AR. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR. 309--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Talmy. 2003. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1--2. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Tatzgern, R. Grasset, D. Kalkofen, and D. Schmalstieg. 2014. Transitional Augmented Reality Navigation for Live Captured Scenes. In Proc. IEEE VR. 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. F. Tecchia, L. Alem, and W. Huang. 2012. 3D Helping Hands: A Gesture Based MR System for Remote Collaboration. In Proc. ACM VRCAI. 323--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S.G. Vandenberg and A.R. Kuse. 1978. Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-dimensional Spatial Visualization. Perceptual and motor skills 47, 2 (1978), 599--604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. R. Wang, S. Paris, and J. Popovi'c. 2011. 6D Hands: Markerless Hand-tracking for Computer Aided Design. In Proc. ACM UIST. 549--558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Wexler, S.M. Kosslyn, and A. Berthoz. 1998. Motor Processes in Mental Rotation. Cognition 68, 1 (1998), 77--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Virtual Replicas for Remote Assistance in Virtual and Augmented Reality

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            UIST '15: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology
            November 2015
            686 pages
            ISBN:9781450337793
            DOI:10.1145/2807442

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 November 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            UIST '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of297submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            UIST '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader