Amirsam Khataei
Abstract
Presentations are effective ways of communicating information, especially in the field of education, but they might not be equally or fully beneficial and persuasive to all users. Each member of the audience might be interested in a particular topic, come from a different background and profession, and have his or her own personality traits.
In this conceptual paper, we first describe our persuasive personalization model; the Individualization Pyramid based on Yale Attitude Change Approach. The model consists of the following main sections: selecting contents by applying segmentation, adjusting comprehensibility of the text, tailoring the language of the text to fit with user's personality and recommending content that is associated with user's personal history within the related subjects. We then propose an enhanced version of our previously published presentation builder, which uses users' digital traces such as those on social media to personalize presentation content. Finally, we highlight the available tools and algorithms to assist us with developing the system.
- A. Piacenza, F. Guerrini, N. Adami, R. Leonardi, J. Porteous, J. Teutenberg and M. Cavazza. (2011). Generating story variants with constrained video recombination. ACM internation conference on Multimedia. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Amirsam Khataei and Ali Arya. (2014). Personalized Presentation Builder. CHI. Toronto. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amirsam Khataei, Diana Lau. (2013). Recommender Narrative Visualization. Conference of the Center For Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research. Toronto. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrews, P. H. (1987). Gender Differences in Persuasive Communication and Attribution of Success and Failure. Human Communication Research, 13(3), 372--385.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ani Nenkova, Sameer Maskey, Yang Liu. (2011). Automatic Summarization. HLT, (pp. 43--76). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Atkinson, Rita, L.; Richard C. Atkinson; Edward E. Smith; Daryl J. Bem; Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. (2000). Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology (13 ed.). Orlando, Florida: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bamshad Mobasher, Robert Cooley, and Jaideep Srivastava. (2000). Automaic personalization based on Web usage mining. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 142--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl I. Hovland, Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley. (1953). Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Yale UP. New Haven.Google Scholar
- Chenhao Tan, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Bo Pang. (2012). To each his own: personalized content selection based on text comprehensibility. The fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Collins-Thompson, K. (2011). Improving information retrieval with reading level prediction. SIGIR 2011 Workshop on Enriching Information Retrieval. Beijing.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1974). Comprehensibility of Persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 758--773.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. (2010). Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabian Abel, Eelco Herder, and Daniel Krause. (2011). Extraction of professional interests from social web profiles. UMAP.Google Scholar
- Financial Navigating in the Current Economy: Ten Things to Consider Before You Make Investing Decisions. (n.d.). (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/tenthingstoconsider.htmGoogle Scholar
- Goldman, N. M. (n.d.). About Rewordify.com. Retrieved from Rewordify.com Understand what you read: https://rewordify.com/Google Scholar
- Gou, L., Zhou, M. X. and Yang, H. (2014). KnowMe and ShareMe: Understanding Automatically Discovered Personality Traits from Social Media and User Sharing Preferences. CHI. Toronto. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. L., G. D. Edward Yu-Te Shen. (2009). What's next? emrgent storytelling from video collection. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factor in Computer Systems. Boston. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hernan Badenes, Mateo N. Bengualid, Jilin Chen, Liang Gou, Eben Haber, Jalal Mahmud, Jeffrey W Nichols, Aditya Pal, Jerald Schoudt, Barton A Smith, Ying Xuan, Huahai Yang, Michelle X. Zhou. (2014). System U: Automatically Deriving Personality Traits from Social Media for People Recommendation. RecSys. Foster City. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Vanderdonckt, N. J. Nunes and C. Rich. (2004). Narrative event adaptation in virtual environments. 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. Funchal. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob B. Hirsh, Sonia K. Kang and Galen V. Bodenhausen. (2012). Personalized Persuasion Tailoring Persuasive Appeals to Recipients' Personality Traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578--581.Google Scholar
- K. M. Brooks. (1997). Do story agents use rocking charis? The theory and implementation of one model for computational narrative. ACM international conference on Multimedia. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristian Woodsend and Mirella Lapata. (2011). Learning to Simplify Sentences with Quasi-Synchronous Grammar and Integer Programming. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Edinburgh. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mairesse, F. and Walker, M. (2007). PERSONAGE: Personality generation for dialogue. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
- Marie-Louise Mares and Ye Sun. (2010). The Multiple Meanings of Age for Television Content Preferences. Human Communication Research.Google Scholar
- Michal Tvarožek, Michal Barla, Mária Bieliková. (2007). Personalized Presentation in Web-Based Information Systems. Theory and Practive of Computer Science, 4362, 796--807. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Cesar, D. Bulterman and L. Soares. (2008). Human-Centered Television: Directions in Interactive Television Research. ACM Trans, on Multimedia Computing, Communication and Applications, 4(4). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachel Croson and Uri Gneezy. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448--474.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. (2004). Catching the Drift: Probabilistic Content Models, with Applications to Generation and Summarization. HLT-NAACL 2004: Proceedings of the Main Conference.Google Scholar
- S. Bocconi, F. Nack and L. Hardman. (2008). Automatic Generation of Matter-of-opinion Video Documentaries. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(2), 139--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, B. (n.d.). Readability Formulas. Retrieved from http://www.readabilityformulas.com/Google Scholar
- Szopka, B. (n.d.). Impress.js. Retrieved from https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js/Google Scholar
- T, Y. (2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality(44), 363--373.Google Scholar
- T. Smith and G. Davenport. (1992). The Stratification System. A Design Environment for Random Access Video. 3rd Int. Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video. California. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Smith and N. Pincever. (1991). Parking Movies In Context. Usenix Conference. Nashville.Google Scholar
- Talia Lavie, Michal Sela, IIit Oppenheim, Ohad Inbar and Joachim Meyer. (2010). User attitudes towards news content personalization. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction Studies, 68(8), 483--495. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zsombori, M. U. J. W. D. W. I. K. V. (2008). Shape Shifting Documentary: A Golden Age. 6th European Conf. on Interactive TV (EUROITV). Salzburg. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Personalized presentation builder for persuasive communication
Recommendations
An Industrial Framework for Personalized Serendipitous Recommendation in E-commerce
RecSys '23: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender SystemsClassical recommendation methods typically face the filter bubble problem where users likely receive recommendations of their familiar items, making them bored and dissatisfied. To alleviate such an issue, this applied paper introduces a novel ...
Integrating Collaborative Filtering and Search-Based Techniques for Personalized Online Product Recommendation
ICDMW '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining WorkshopsThe existing Collaborative Filtering (CF) technique that has been widely applied by e-commerce sites requires a large amount of ratings data to make meaningful recommendations. It is not directly applicable for recommending products that are not ...
Collaborative user modeling for enhanced content filtering in recommender systems
Recommender systems, which have emerged in response to the problem of information overload, provide users with recommendations of content suited to their needs. To provide proper recommendations to users, personalized recommender systems require ...
Comments