skip to main content
10.1145/277631.277642acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespasteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Efficient composite data flow analysis applied to concurrent programs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 1998Publication History

ABSTRACT

FLAVERS, a tool for verifying properties of concurrent systems, uses composite data flow analysis to incrementally improve the precision of the results of its verifications. Although FLAVERS is one of the few static analysis techniques for concurrent systems that has the potential to handle large scale systems, it sometimes can still be very expensive to use. In this paper we experimentally compare the cost of two versions of this approach for solving composite data flow analysis problems. The first version, product-based, uses the more straightforward approach, and the second, tuple-based, is built around the idea of reducing analysis space requirements at the expense of analysis time. We demonstrate experimentally, by analyzing properties of actual concurrent programs, that the tuple-based version is comparable in time to the product-based version but for large composite data flow problems it requires several orders of magnitude less space.

References

  1. 1.R. Bodik, R. Gupta, and M. L. Soffa. Refining data flow information using infeasible paths. In Proceedings of the 6th European Sgfiware Engineering Conflrence and the 5th ACM SIGSOFTSymposium on Foundations of software Engineering, pages 361.--377, September 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.M Dwyer. Data Flow Analysis fbr Verifjiing Correctness Properties of Concurrent Programs. PhD thesis, University of Massachussetts, Amherst, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.M. Dwyer and L. Clarke. Data flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent programs. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 62-75, December 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.P. Godefroid and P. Wolper. Using partial orders for the efficient verification of deadlock freedom and safety properties. In Proceeding.s of the Third Workhop on Computer Aided Ver@ation, pages 417428, July 1991. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.L. H. Halley and B. K. Rosen. Qualified data flow problems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-7( I ):60-78, January I98 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.G. J. Holzmann, P. Godefroid, and D. Pirottin. Coverage preserving reduction strategies for reachability analysis. In Proceedins of 12th International Conjkrence on Protocol Specification. Testing, and Ver- $cation. INWG/IFIP, Orlando, FI., June 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman. Formal Languages and their Relation to Automata. Addison-Wesley, 1969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.T. J. Marlowe and B. G. Ryder. Properties of data flow frameworks. Acta Informutica, (28):121-163, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.S. P. Masticola, T. J. Marlowe, and B. G. Ryder. Lattice frameworks for multisource and bidirectional data flow problems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Sy.stems, 17(5):777- 803, September 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.G. Naumovich, L. A. Clarke, and L. J. Osterweii. Verification of communication protocols using data flow analysis. In Proc. ofrhe Fourth ACMSlGSOFTSymposium on the Foundations of SofhYare Engineering, pages 9%05, Oct. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.G. Naumovich, L. A. Clarke, and L. J. Osterweil. Comparing implementation strategies for composite data flow analysis problems. Technical Report UM-C&1997-043, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, August 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.K. M. Olender and L. J. Osterweil. Cecil: A Sequencing Constraint Language for Automatic Static Analysis Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(3):268-280, March 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.A. Valmari. A stubborn attack on state explosion. In E. M. Clarke and R. Kurshan, editors, Computer-Aided Verification, pages 25-41. American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 1991. Number 3 in DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient composite data flow analysis applied to concurrent programs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          PASTE '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering
          July 1998
          90 pages
          ISBN:1581130554
          DOI:10.1145/277631

          Copyright © 1998 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 July 1998

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          PASTE '98 Paper Acceptance Rate10of28submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate57of159submissions,36%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader