Guy A. Boy
- 1.Billings, C.E. (1991). Human-centered aircra~ automation philosphy. NASA TM 103885, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
- 2.Boehm, B.W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. 1EEE Computer, Vol. 21, no. 5, May, pp. 61-72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Boy, G.A. (1997). Active design documents. Proceedings of ACM DIS'97 Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Boy, G.A. (1998). Cognitive Function Analysis. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
- 5.Bmdshaw, J. (1997). Software Agents. MITIAAAI Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
- 6.Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. & NeweU, A. (1983). The P~,chology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Carroll, J.M. and Moran, T. (1991). Introduction to this special issue on design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., Vol. 6.Google Scholar
- 8.Carroll, J.M. & Rosson, M.B. (1991). Deliberated Evolution: Stalking the View Matcher in Design Space. Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., Volume 6, pp. 281-318.Google Scholar
- 9.Carroll, J.M., Alpert, S.R., Karat, J., Van Deusen, M.S. & Rosson, M.B. (1994). Raison d'Etre: Capturing design history and rationale in multimedia narratives. Proceech'ngs of the A CM CHI'94 Conference. (Boston, April 24-28). New York: ACM Press, pp. 192-197, 478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.De Brito, G., Pinet, J. & Boy, G. (1997). Checklist use in new generation aircraft. EURISCO Technical Report no. T-97-042.Google Scholar
- 11.FCOM-A320 (1997). Flight Crew Operation Manual A320. Airbus Industrie, Toulouse-Blagnae, France.Google Scholar
- 12.Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K. & Oswald, J. (1995). Supporting the evolution of design artifacts with representations of context and intent. Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'95). ACM Press, pp. 7-15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Hutchins, E. (1995). How a Cockpit Remembers its Speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, pp. 265-288.Google Scholar
- 14.Irving, S., Poison, P. & Irving, I.E. (1994). A GOMS analysis of the advanced automated cockpit. Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI'94 Conference Proceedings. ACM Press, pp. 344-350. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Langley, P.W., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J.M. (1987). Scientific dicovery; An account of the creative process. MIT Press. Boston, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.MuUer, M. (1991). Participatory design in Britain and North America: Responding to the <<Scandinavian Challenge>>. In Reading Through Technology, CHI'91 Conference Proceedings. S.P. Robertson, G.M. Ohlson and J.S. Ohlson Eds. ACM, pp. 389-392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Acadenfie Press. London. Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Norman, D.A. (1992). Turn Signals are the Facial Expressions of Automobiles. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.Google Scholar
- 19.Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' mental model and awareness of the Flight Management System. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, pp. 1-28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 20.Sheridan, T.B. (1984). Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicules and dynamic processes: experiment in command and display aiding. Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research, J.A.I. Press, 1, pp. 49- 137.Google Scholar
- 21.Shneiderman, B. & Maes, P. (1997). Dkeet manipulation vs. Interface agents, interactions, November-December, volume IV.6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans rout situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.Terveeen, L.G, Selfridge, P.G. & Long, M.D. (1995). Living design memory: Framework, implementation and lesson learned. Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 10, pp. 1-37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Vicente, IC J., & Pejtersen, A. M. (in preparation). Cognitive work analysis: Towards, safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Wiener, E.L. (1995). The focus of automation: Which tasks should be automated. EURISCO Industrial Summer School on Human-Centered Automation. Saint- Lary, France.Google Scholar
- 26.Zimmermann, B. & Selvin, A.M. (1997). A framework for assessing group memory approaches for software design projects. Proceedings of DIS'97. August 18-20, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Cognitive function analysis for human-centered automation of safety-critical systems
Recommendations
On Safety--Critical Computer Control Systems
CBMS '97: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS '97)In the paper, safety critical computer control systems are dealt with, which can be employed in medical applications. Safety licensing of such systems, especially of their software parts, is extremely difficult and for the time being almost impossible ...
Using dynamic adaptive systems in safety-critical domains
SEAMS '16: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing SystemsThe development of safety-critical Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) is expanding due to the Internet of Things' promise to make high-integrity applications and services part of everyday life. This expansion is seen in the dependencies some connected ...
A Framework for Assessing Standards for Safety Critical Computer-Based Systems
ISESS '99: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium and Forum on Software Engineering StandardsThis paper presents a framework for assessing different standards for computer-based safety-critical systems. Key attributes of standards forming a basis for comparison are described. Three examples of standards are described using this framework: MIL-...
Comments