A study of barriers to women in undergraduate computer science.

ABSTRACT

Worldwide, there is a significant discrepancy between the numbers of male and female graduates from computer science programs. SUNY Geneseo offers no exception. The literature cites a number of plausible explanations for the problem, but no definitive answers. We conducted a study to determine why few women complete our own computer science major. Our major finding is that (at least on our campus) the problem is not actually one of retention. Few women---even those in the introductory computer science courses---actually plan to major in computer science to begin with. Although some barriers suggested in the literature do operate within the major, they seem much less significant than the low entry rates. Retention of women once they enter the major is important, but it is secondary to getting women into the major initially. This suggests that the most effective solutions will be those that concentrate not on retention but on recruitment (including outreach to secondary schools).

References

1. 1.Cottrell, J. I'm a Stranger Here Myself." A Consideration of Women in Computing. Proceedings of the 1992 A CM SIGUCCS User Services Conference (Nov. 1992). pp. 71-76.
2. 2.Howell, K. The Experience of Women in Undergraduate Computer Science: What Does the Research Say? SIGCSE Bulletin, June 199,3 (25:2). pp. 1-8.
3. 3.Klawe, M. and Leveson, N. Women in Computing" Where are We Now? Communications of the A CM, Jan, 1995 (38:1). pp. 29-35.
4. 4.Liu, M. L. and Blanc, L. On theRetention of Female Computer Science Students. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Feb. 1996). pp. 32-36.
5. 5.Pearl, A. et al. Becoming a Computer Scientist. Communications of the ACM, Nov. 1990 (33:11). pp. 47-57.
6. 6.Sackrowitz, M. and Parelius, A. An Unlevel Playing Field: Women in the Introductory Computer Science Courses. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Feb. 1996). pp. 37-41.
7. 7.Spertus, E. Why Are There So Few Female Computer Scientists? MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report number 1315, 1991.
8. 8.Teague, G. J., and Clark, V. Attracting Women to Tertiary Computing Courses: Two Programs Directed at Secondary Level. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth SIGCSE Technical Syn~posium on Computer Science Education (Feb. 1993). pp. 208-212.
9. 9.Townsend, G. Viewing Video-Taped Role Models Improves Female Attitudes Toward Computer Science. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Feb. 1996). pp. 42-45.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education