skip to main content
10.1145/2783449.2783480acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Real-time dynamic singularity avoidance while visual servoing of a dual-arm space robot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Singularity of robotic manipulators is an important issue in the stability and control of autonomous robotic systems. This paper presents a real-time dynamic singularity avoidance approach for such autonomous free-floating space robots where visual servoing is used as feedback in the control loop. The proposed method uses manipulability measure as distance criteria and does not require any prior knowledge of singular configurations. Velocities in task space are projected on a surface of constant manipulability measure to avoid singular configurations. Numerical experiments are carried out, to validate the proposed method, on a 6-Degrees-of-Freedom dual-arm space robot mounted on a service satellite.

References

  1. Angel Flores-Abad, Ou Ma, and Khanh Pham. A review of robotics technologies for on-orbit services. Technical report, DTIC Document, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D Reintsema, J Thaeter, A Rathke, W Naumann, P Rank, and J Sommer. Deos--the german robotics approach to secure and de-orbit malfunctioned satellites from low earth orbits.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoji Umetani and Kazuya Yoshida. Resolved motion rate control of space manipulators with generalized jacobian matrix. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, 5(3):303--314, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Subir Kumar Saha. A unified approach to space robot kinematics. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, 12(3):401--405, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. AH Abdul Hafez and CV Jawahar. Visual servoing by optimization of a 2d/3d hybrid objective function. In ICRA, pages 1691--1696. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryuta Ozawa and François Chaumette. Dynamic visual servoing with image moments for a quadrotor using a virtual spring approach. In ICRA, pages 5670--5676. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. A. Hafez, V. Anurag, S. Shah, K. M. Krishna, and C. Jawahar. Reactionless visual servoing of a dual-arm space robot. In ICRA. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Evangelos Papadopoulos and Steven Dubowsky. Dynamic singularities in free-floating space manipulators. Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control, 115(1):44--52, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsuneo Yoshikawa. Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. The international journal of Robotics Research, 4(2):3--9, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Evangelos G Papadopoulos. Path planning for space manipulators exhibiting nonholonomic behavior. In IROS, pages 669--675, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wenfu Xu, Bin Liang, Cheng Li, Yu Liu, and Yangsheng Xu. Autonomous target capturing of free-floating space robot: theory and experiments. Robotica, 27(03):425--445, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kostas Nanos and Evangelos Papadopoulos. On cartesian motions with singularities avoidance for free-floating space robots. In ICRA, pages 5398--5403. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Suril V Shah, Inna Sharf, and Arun K Misra. Reactionless path planning strategies for capture of tumbling objects in space using a dualarm robotic system. In AIAA GNC Conference, volume 2013, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Giacomo Marani, Jinhyun Kim, Junku Yuh, and Wan Kyun Chung. A real-time approach for singularity avoidance in resolved motion rate control of robotic manipulators. In ICRA, volume 2, pages 1973--1978. IEEE, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kazuya Yoshida, Kenichi Hashizume, and Satoko Abiko. Zero reaction maneuver: flight validation with ets-vii space robot and extension to kinematically redundant arm. In ICRA, volume 1, pages 441--446. IEEE, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Eric Marchand, François Chaumette, and Alessandro Rizzo. Using the task function approach to avoid robot joint limits and kinematic singularities in visual servoing. In IROS, volume 3, pages 1083--1090. IEEE, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. François Chaumette and Seth Hutchinson. Visual servo control. i. basic approaches. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 13(4):82--90, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Real-time dynamic singularity avoidance while visual servoing of a dual-arm space robot

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AIR '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Advances In Robotics
          July 2015
          413 pages
          ISBN:9781450333566
          DOI:10.1145/2783449

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 July 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader