skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2783358acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient Latent Link Recommendation in Signed Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Signed networks, in which the relationship between two nodes can be either positive (indicating a relationship such as trust) or negative (indicating a relationship such as distrust), are becoming increasingly common. A plausible model for user behavior analytics in signed networks can be based upon the assumption that more extreme positive and negative relationships are explored and exploited before less extreme ones. Such a model implies that a personalized ranking list of latent links should place positive links on the top, negative links at the bottom, and unknown status links in between. Traditional ranking metrics, e.g., area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), are however not suitable for quantifying such a ranking list which includes positive, negative, and unknown status links. To address this issue, a generalized AUC (GAUC) which can measure both the head and tail of a ranking list has been introduced. Since GAUC weights each pairwise comparison equally and the calculation of GAUC requires quadratic time, we derive two lower bounds of GAUC which can be computed in linear time and put more emphasis on ranking positive links on the top and negative links at the bottom of a ranking list. Next, we develop two efficient latent link recommendation (ELLR) algorithms in order to recommend links by directly optimizing these two lower bounds, respectively. Finally, we compare these two ELLR algorithms with top-performing baseline methods over four benchmark datasets, among which the largest network has more than 100 thousand nodes and seven million entries. Thorough empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed ELLR algorithms outperform state-of-the-art approaches for link recommendation in signed networks at no cost in efficiency.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1105.mp4

mp4

209.2 MB

References

  1. L. A. Adamic and E. Adar. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks, 25(3):211 -- 230, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social network. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM international Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 635--644, Hong Kong, China, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. J. Brozzowski, T. Hogg, and G. Szabo. Friends and foes: ideological social networking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 817--820, Florence, Italy, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Burke and R. Kraul. Mopping up: Modeling wikipedia promotion decisions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 27--36, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Cao, J. Xu, T.-Y. Liu, H. Li, Y. Huang, and H.-W. Ho. Adapting ranking svm to document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th SIGIR Conference on Research and Development, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Cremonesi, Y. Koren, and R. Turrin. Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 39--46, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. V. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkin. Propogation of trust and distrust. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 403--412, New York, NY, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. A. Hanley and B. J. Mcneil. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. J. Hsieh, K. Y. Chiang, and I. S. Dhillon. Low rank modeling of signed network. In ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Beijing, China, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Katz. A new status index dervied from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1):39--43, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 426--434, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Lampe, E. Johnston, and R. Resnick. Follow the reader: filtering comments on slashdot. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1253--1262, San Jose, CA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Lee, S. Bengio, S. Kim, G. Lebanon, and Y. Singer. Local collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Leskovec, D. P. Huttenlocher, and J. M. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 641--650, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Li. A generalization of auc to an ordered multiclass diagnoisis and application to longitudianl data analysis on intellectual outcome in pediatric brain-tumor patients. Ph.D Thesis of Geogia State University, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction for social networks. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7):1019--1031, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. K. Menon and C. Elkan. Link prediction via matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, Part II, LNAI2912, pages 437--452, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. T. Nakas and C. T. Yiannoutsos. Ordered multi-class roc analyisis with continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine, 23:3437--3449, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 452--461, Arlington, Virginia, United States, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. D. M. Rennie and N. Srebro. Fast maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 713--719, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Salakhutdinov and A. Mnih. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Shi, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. List-wise learning to rank with matrix factorization for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 269--272, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Song and D. A. Meyer. A model of consistent node types in signed directed social networks. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, pages 82--90, Beijing, China,, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. D. Song and D. A. Meyer. Recommding positive links in signed social networks by optmizing a generalized auc. In Proceedings of 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, USA, January, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Song, D. A. Meyer, and M. R. Min. Fast nonnegative matrix factorization with rank-one admm. In NIPS Workshop on Optimization for Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Tang, S. Chang, C. C. Aggarwal, and H. Liu. Negative link prediction in social media. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 87--96, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Tang, S. Wu, J. Sun, and H. Su. Cross-domain collaboration recommendation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 1285--1293, Beijing, China, August, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Weimer, A. Karatzoglou, and A. Smola. Improving maximum margin matrix factorization. Machine Leanring, 72(3):263--276, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. F. Xia, T.-Y. Liu, J. Wang, W. Zhang, and H. Li. Listwise approach learning to rank - theory and algorithm. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1192--1199, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Latent Link Recommendation in Signed Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2015
        2378 pages
        ISBN:9781450336642
        DOI:10.1145/2783258

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader