ABSTRACT
Assistive robots that address different impairments and continuously changing capabilities by providing manifold interactions based on profiles are not targeted in current research. Substantiated by a survey of human-robot interaction for assistive systems, we claim the need for establishing the innovative research topic of Accessible Human-Robot Interaction (AHRI). It is shown that limitations or loss of motoric, sensory, and mental capabilities as well as multiple impairments and resulting barriers regarding interaction, communication and perception are not sufficiently incorporated in designs of assistive robots. To achieve a design for all, fundamental research on varying needs, capabilities, and preferences along with derivation of profiles and developments of new adaptive and adaptable interaction concepts is necessary.
- J. Abascal, A. Aizpurua, I. Cearreta, B. Gamecho, N. Garay-Vitoria, and R. Miñón. Automatically generating tailored accessible user interfaces for ubiquitous services. Proc. 13th ACM SIGACCESS, pages 187--194., ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Brell, J. Meyer, T. Frenken, and A. Hein. A mobile robot for self-selected gait velocity assessments in assistive environments: A robotic driven approach to bring assistive technologies into established homes. Proc. 3rd PETRA, pages 15:1--15:8, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Cesta, F. Pecora, R. Rasconi, L. Iocchi, R. Leone, and D. Nardi. Lucia: a cognitive robot in an intelligent environment. Proc. Workshop on Socially Assistive Robotics, 2006.Google Scholar
- W.-L. Chang, S. Šabanovic, and L. Huber. Use of seal-like robot paro in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. Proc. 8th ACM/IEEE HRI, pages 101--102, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE Press, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Coradeschi, A. Cesta, G. Cortellessa, L. Coraci, J. Gonzalez, L. Karlsson, F. Furfari, A. Loutfi, A. Orlandini, F. Palumbo, F. Pecora, S. von Rump, A. Stimec, J. Ullberg, and B. Otslund. Giraffplus: Combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living. Proc. 6th HSI, pages 578--585, June 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Gajos and D. S. Weld. Supple: automatically generating user interfaces. Proc. 9th IUI, pages 93--100. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Galatas, C. McMurrough, G. L. Mariottini, and F. Makedon. eyedog: An assistive-guide robot for the visually impaired. Proc. 4th PETRA, pages 58:1--58:8, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Gregor, A. F. Newell, and M. Zajicek. Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. Proc. 5th ASSETS, pages 151--156. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hans, B. Graf, and R. Schraft. Robotic home assistant care-o-bot: past-present-future. Proc.IEEE ROMAN 2002, pages 380--385, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Harmo, T. Taipalus, J. Knuuttila, J. Vallet, and A. Halme. Needs and solutions - home automation and service robots for the elderly and disabled. Proc. IROS 2005, pages 3201--3206, Aug 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Holbø, S. Bøthun, and Y. Dahl. Safe walking technology for people with dementia: What do they want? Proc. ASSETS '13, pages 21:1--21:8, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Jung and V. Hahn. Guide--adaptive user interfaces for accessible hybrid tv applications. In Second W3C Workshop Web & TV, 2011.Google Scholar
- R. Khosla, M.-T. Chu, R. Kachouie, K. Yamada, and T. Yamaguchi. Embodying care in matilda: An affective communication robot for the elderly in australia. In Proc. IHI '12, pages 295--304, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Kristoffersson, S. Coradeschi, K. S. Eklundh, and A. Loutfi. Towards measuring quality of interaction in mobile robotic telepresence using sociometric badges. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 4(1):34--48, September 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Lacey and K. M. Dawson-Howe. The application of robotics to a mobility aid for the elderly blind. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 23(4):245--252, 1998. Intelligent Robotics Systems - SIRS'97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. W. Lang. An expert autonomous vacuum cleaner robot. Proc. IEA/AIE '88, pages 598--604, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Lazewatsky and W. Smart. Accessible interfaces for robot assistants. 2014 RO-MAN, pages 106--111, Aug 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lee, G. Obinata, D. Stefanov, and C. Nagai. A preliminary study on the response of autistic persons to a robot feedback based on visual stimuli. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 4(2):73--82, December 2013.Google Scholar
- M. K. Lee, J. Forlizzi, P. E. Rybski, F. Crabbe, W. Chung, J. Finkle, E. Glaser, and S. Kiesler. The snackbot: Documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction. Proc. HRI '09, pages 7--14, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Loitsch, E. Chalkia, E. Bekiaris, and G. Weber. Tailored versus prioritized configuration towards accessibility. a study on weighted preferences. Proc. UAHCI 2014, Springer, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Loitsch, A. Stiegler, C. Strobbe, D. Tzovaras, K. Votis, G. Weber, and G. Zimmermann. Improving accessibility by matching user needs and preferences. In Proc. AAATE 2013, pages 1357--1365, Vilamoura, Portugal, IOS Press, 2013.Google Scholar
- Q. Meng and M. Lee. Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(2):171--186, 2006. Engineering Informatics for Eco-Design. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W.-H. Mou, M.-F. Chang, C.-K. Liao, Y.-H. Hsu, S.-H. Tseng, and L.-C. Fu. Context-aware assisted interactive robotic walker for parkinson's disease patients. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ IROS 2012, pages 329--334, Oct 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Obrenovic, J. Abascal, and D. Starcevic. Universal accessibility as a multimodal design issue. Communications of the ACM, 50(5):83--88, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Peissner, D. Häbe, D. Janssen, and T. Sellner. Myui: generating accessible user interfaces from multimodal design patterns. In Proce. 4th ACM SIGCHI, pages 81--90. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Pollack, S. Engberg, J. Matthews, S. Thrun, L. Brown, D. Colbry, C. Orosz, B. Peintner, S. Ramakrishnan, J. Dunbar-Jacob, C. McCarthy, M. Montemerlo, J. Pineau, and N. Roy. Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In Workshop on Automation as Caregiver: the Role of Intelligent Technology in Elder Care (AAAI), August 2002.Google Scholar
- N. Reich and F. Eyssel. Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: The role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 4(2):123--130, December 2013.Google Scholar
- A. J. Rentschler, R. A. Cooper, B. Blasch, and M. L. Boninger. Intelligent walkers for the elderly: Performance and safety testing of va-pamaid robotic walker. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 40, No. 5:423--432, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn. Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In Proc. HRI '15, pages 141--148, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Savidis and C. Stephanidis. Unified user interface design: designing universally accessible interactions. Interacting with computers, 16(2):243--270, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Seidel, N. Crilly, F. E. Matthews, C. Jagger, C. Brayne, and P. J. Clarkson. Patterns of functional loss among older people: a prospective analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2009.Google Scholar
- K.-L. Skillen, L. Chen, C. D. Nugent, M. P. Donnelly, W. Burns, and I. Solheim. Ontological user modelling and semantic rule-based reasoning for personalisation of help-on-demand services in pervasive environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Sugiura, A. Withana, T. Shinohara, M. Ogata, D. Sakamoto, M. Inami, and T. Igarashi. Cooky: A cooperative cooking robot system. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2011, pages 17:1--17:1, NY, USA, ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. M. Tsui, J. M. Dalphond, D. J. Brooks, M. S. Medvedev, E. McCann, J. Allspaw, D. Kontak, and H. A. Yanco. Accessible human-robot interaction for telepresence robots: A case study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 6(1):2081--4836, January 2015.Google Scholar
- G. C. Vanderheiden, J. Treviranus, M. Gemou, E. Bekiaris, K. Markus, C. Clark, and A. Basman. The evolving global public inclusive infrastructure (gpii). Proc. UAHCI 2013, pages 107--116. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Position paper: accessible human-robot interaction (AHRI)
Recommendations
Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesTouchscreen computing devices such as the iPhone are becoming more common. However this technology is largely inaccessible to people with visual impairments. We present the results of a requirements capture study that illustrates the problems with ...
A Prototype System to Support the KJ Method by Cooperation between Visually-Impaired Persons and Sighted Persons
AINAW '08: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - WorkshopsThe KJ method is an idea generation method and widely used in Japan. In this study, we developed a prototype system which can assist visually-impaired persons to perform the KJ method with sighted persons. Visual operations such as seeing the cards are ...
Disability and Accessibility in Computer Science Education
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2Students with disabilities face a variety of challenges in computer science education including those related to stigma around disability, inaccessible curriculum, instruction and tools, disability disclosure, and a lack of mentors. In addition, few ...
Comments