skip to main content
10.1145/2767386.2767406acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Space Complexity of Set Agreement

Published:21 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The k-set agreement problem is a generalization of the classical consensus problem in which processes are permitted to output up to k different input values. In a system of n processes, an m-obstruction-free solution to the problem requires termination only in executions where the number of processes taking steps is eventually bounded by m. This family of progress conditions generalizes wait-freedom (m = n) and obstruction-freedom (m = 1). In this paper, we prove upper and lower bounds on the number of registers required to solve m-obstruction-free k-set agreement, considering both one-shot and repeated formulations. In particular, we show that repeated k set agreement can be solved using n + 2 m-k registers and establish a nearly matching lower bound of n + 2 m-k.

References

  1. Yehuda Afek, Hagit Attiya, Danny Dolev, Eli Gafni, Michael Merritt, and Nir Shavit. Atomic snapshots of shared memory. Journal of the ACM, 40(4):873--890, September 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Elizabeth Borowsky and Eli Gafni. Generalized FLP impossibility result for $t$-resilient asynchronous computations. In Proc. 25th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 91--100, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Soma Chaudhuri. More choices allow more faults: Set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems. Information and Computation, 105(1):132--158, July 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Eli Gafni, and Sergio Rajsbaum. Black art: Obstruction-free k-set agreement with |MWMR registers|<|proccesses|. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Networked Systems, volume 7853 of LNCS, pages 28--41, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Petr Kuznetsov, and Eric Ruppert. On the space complexity of set agreement. CoRR, abs/1505.02690, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Faith Ellen, Panagiota Fatourou, and Eric Ruppert. Time lower bounds for implementations of multi-writer snapshots. Journal of the ACM, 54(6), December 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Faith Ellen Fich, Maurice Herlihy, and Nir Shavit. On the space complexity of randomized synchronization. Journal of the ACM, 45(5):843--862, September 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rachid Guerraoui and Eric Ruppert. Anonymous and fault-tolerant shared-memory computing. Distributed Computing, 20(3):165--177, October 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Maurice Herlihy. Wait-free synchronization. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(1):124--149, January 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Maurice Herlihy, Victor Luchangco, and Mark Moir. Obstruction-free synchronization: Double-ended queues as an example. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 522--529, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maurice Herlihy and Nir Shavit. The topological structure of asynchronous computability. Journal of the ACM, 46(6):858--923, November 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael Saks and Fotios Zaharoglou. Wait-free k-set agreement is impossible: The topology of public knowledge. SIAM Journal on Computing, 29(5):1449--1483, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gadi Taubenfeld. Contention-sensitive data structures and algorithms. In Proc.\ 23rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing, volume 5805 of LNCS, pages 157--171, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul M. B. Vitányi and Baruch Awerbuch. Atomic shared register access by asynchronous hardware. In Proc. 27th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 233--243, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jiong Yang, Gil Neiger, and Eli Gafni. Structured derivations of consensus algorithms for failure detectors. In Proc. 17th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 297--306, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the Space Complexity of Set Agreement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PODC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
      July 2015
      508 pages
      ISBN:9781450336178
      DOI:10.1145/2767386

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 July 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PODC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate45of191submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate740of2,477submissions,30%

      Upcoming Conference

      PODC '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader