skip to main content
10.1145/2757226.2757248acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Building Support Tools to Connect Novice Designers with Professional Coaches

Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Creativity support tools help learners undertake creative work, such as facilitating coaching by creative professionals. How might we design creativity support tools that in-crease learners' access to coaching by creative professionals? This study took place in an extracurricular project-based learning program where students were co-located, and met professional coaches face-to-face once a week but otherwise communicated online. To test an online creativity support tool called the Loft and investigate coach-student communication we collected data from 47 interviews, online log data and field observations. We found that (a) explicit help-seeking was rare outside of meetings, (b) help from professionals was highly-valued but not sought out, and (c) online systems could surface learner struggles and trigger help-giving. Our findings suggested that online creativity platforms can support professional coaching through: (1) structured virtual updates (2) coach thanking, (3) Computer-Supported Group Critique, (4) disclosure of expertise, and (5) help-seeking training.

References

  1. Amabile, T.M. Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Boston, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain, A. The learning edge: What technology can do to educate all children. Teachers College Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom, B.S. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, (1984), 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W. and Soloway, E. Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist 35, 3 (2000), 149--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A. Motivating projectbased learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist 26, 3-4 (1991), 369--398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt, J., Dontcheva, M., Weskamp, M. and Klemmer, S.R. Example-centric programming: integrating web search into the development environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2010), 513--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chilana, P.K., Ko, A.J. and Wobbrock, J.O. LemonAid: selection-based crowdsourced contextual help for web applications. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2012), 1549--1558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cho, K. and Schunn, C.D. Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education 48, 3 (2007), 409--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Collins, A., Brown, J.S. and Holum, A. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American educator 15, 3 (1991), 6--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross, N. Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterday, M.W., Rees Lewis, D., Fitzpatrick, C. and Gerber, E.M. Computer supported novice group critique. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, (2014), 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Edelson, D.C., Pea, R.D. and Gomez, L. Constructivism in the collaborator. Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design, (1996), 151--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fogarty, J., Au, C. and Hudson, S.E. Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, (2006), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nelson-Le Gall, S. Help-seeking behavior in learning. Review of research in education, (1985), 55--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerber, E.M., Marie Olson, J. and Komarek, R.L. Extracurricular design-based learning: Preparing students for careers in innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education 28, 2 (2012), 317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Review of educational research 77, 1 (2007), 81--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoadley, C.M. and Bell, P. Web for Your Head: The Design of Digital Resources to Enhance LifelongLearning. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S.D. The anatomy of a largescale social search engine. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, (2010), 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hrastinski, S. and Stenbom, S. Student--student online coaching: Conceptualizing an emerging learning activity. The Internet and higher education 16, (2013), 66--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitsantas, A. and Chow, A. College students perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed, and distance learning environments. Computers & Education 48, 3 (2007), 383--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kolodner, J.L., Owensby, J.N. and Guzdial, M. Casebased learning aids. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 2, (2004), 829--861.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L. and Rashid, A.M. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 4 (2005), 00-00.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Osterwalders, A. Business model canvas. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Puustinen, M. and Rouet, J.-F. Learning with new technologies: Help seeking and information searching revisited. Computers & Education 53, 4 (2009), 1014--1019. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Serverance, C. Teaching the world: Daphne koller and coursera. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaffer, D.W. and Resnick, M. Thick" Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning. Journal of interactive learning research 10, 2 (1999), 195--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sloep, P. Redes de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en red. Comunicar 19, 37 (2011), 55--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Spradley, J.P. Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Topping, K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68, 3 (1998), 249--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. VanLehn, K. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist 46, 4 (2011), 197--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Van Merriënboer, J.J. and Kirschner, P.A. Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to fourcomponent instructional design. Routledge, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Building Support Tools to Connect Novice Designers with Professional Coaches

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition
        June 2015
        420 pages
        ISBN:9781450335980
        DOI:10.1145/2757226

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        C&C '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of88submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader