skip to main content
10.1145/2739480.2754794acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Distinguishing Adaptive Search from Random Search in Robots and T cells

Published:11 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to trigger an adaptive immune response, T cells move through lymph nodes (LNs) searching for dendritic cells (DCs) that carry antigens indicative of infection. We hypothesize that T cells adapt to cues in the (LN) environment to increase search efficiency. We test this hypothesis by identifying locations that are visited by T cells more frequently than a random model of search would suggest. We then test whether T cells that visit such locations have different movement patterns than other T cells. Our analysis suggests that T cells do adapt their movement in response to cues that may indicate the locations of DC targets. We test the ability of our method to identify frequently visited sites in T cells and in a swarm of simulated iAnt robots evolved to search using a suite of biologically-inspired behaviours. We compare the movement of T cells and robots that repeatedly sample the same locations in space with the movement of agents that do not resample space in order to understand whether repeated sampling alters movement. Our analysis suggests that specific environmental cues can be inferred from the movement of T cells. While the precise identity of these cues remains unknown, comparing adaptive search strategies of robots to the movement patterns of T cells lends insights into search efficiency in both systems.

References

  1. E. U. Acar, H. Choset, Y. Zhang, and M. Schervish. Path planning for robotic demining: Robust sensor-based coverage of unstructured environments and probabilistic methods. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 22(7--8):441--466, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. E. J. Allenspach, P. Cullinan, J. Tong, Q. Tang, A. G. Tesciuba, J. L. Cannon, S. M. Takahashi, R. Morgan, J. K. Burkhardt, and A. I. Sperling. Erm-dependent movement of cd43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. Immunity, 15(5):739--750, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. U. Alon, M. G. Surette, N. Barkai, and S. Leibler. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature, 397(6715):168--171, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Be'er, S. K. Strain, R. A. Hernández, E. Ben-Jacob, and E.-L. Florin. Periodic reversals in paenibacillus dendritiformis swarming. Journal of bacteriology, 195(12):2709--2717, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Flanagan, K. Letendre, W. Burnside, G. Fricke, and M. Moses. Quantifying the effect of colony size and food distribution on harvester ant foraging. PloS one, 7(7):e39427, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. M. Fricke, F. Asperti-Boursin, J. Hecker, J. Cannon, and M. Moses. From microbiology to microcontrollers: Robot search patterns inspired by T cell movement. In Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL, volume 12, pages 1009--1016, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. G. M. Fricke, F. Asperti-Boursin, J. Hecker, J. Cannon, and M. Moses. Beyond lévy: Efficiency of t cell search in lymph nodes. (In review)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Y. Gerner, P. Torabi-Parizi, and R. N. Germain. Strategically localized dendritic cells promote rapid t cell responses to lymph-borne particulate antigens. Immunity, 42(1):172--185, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. H. Harris, E. J. Banigan, D. A. Christian, C. Konradt, E. D. T. Wojno, K. Norose, E. H. Wilson, B. John, W. Weninger, A. D. Luster, et al. Generalized lévy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector cd8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. t cells. Nature, 486(7404):545--548, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. P. Hecker, K. Stolleis, B. Swenson, K. Letendre, and M. E. Moses. Evolving Error Tolerance in Biologically-Inspired iAnt Robots. In ECAL 2013, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. M. Hedrick. The acquired immune system-a vantage from beneath. Immunity, 21(5):607--616, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. H. Huang, L. I. Cárdenas-Navia, C. C. Caldwell, T. J. Plumb, C. G. Radu, P. N. Rocha, T. Wilder, J. S. Bromberg, B. N. Cronstein, M. Sitkovsky, et al. Requirements for t lymphocyte migration in explanted lymph nodes. The Journal of Immunology, 178(12):7747--7755, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. N. Humphries, H. Weimerskirch, N. Queiroz, E. Southall, and D. Sims. Foraging success of biological lévy flights recorded in situ. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19):7169--7174, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. P. Hecker and M. E.\ Moses Beyond pheromones: Evolving error-tolerant, flexible, and scalable ant-inspired robot swarms. Swarm Intelligence, 9(1), 43--70, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. I. R. Mackay, F. S. Rosen, U. H. von Andrian, and C. R. Mackay. T-cell function and migration - two sides of the same coin. New England Journal of Medicine, 343(14):1020--1034, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. P. Matheu, I. Parker, and M. D. Cahalan. Dissection and 2-photon imaging of peripheral lymph nodes in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, (7), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. P. Mirsky, M. J. Miller, J. J. Linderman, and D. E. Kirschner. Systems biology approaches for understanding cellular mechanisms of immunity in lymph nodes during infection. Journal of theoretical biology, 287:160--170, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Moses and S. Banerjee. Biologically inspired design principles for scalable, robust, adaptive, decentralized search and automated response (radar). In Artificial Life (ALIFE), 2011 IEEE Symposium on, pages 30--37. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. W. Stephens and J. R. Krebs. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. J. Taylor. The hausdorff α-dimensional measure of brownian paths in n-space. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, volume 49, pages 31--39. Cambridge Univ Press, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. G. Viswanathan, F. Bartumeus, S. V Buldyrev, J. Catalan, U. Fulco, S. Havlin, M. Da Luz, M. Lyra, E. Raposo, and H. Eugene Stanley. Levy flight random searches in biological phenomena. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 314(1):208--213, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. E. O. Wilson and B. Hölldobler. The rise of the ants: a phylogenetic and ecological explanation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(21):7411--7414, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Distinguishing Adaptive Search from Random Search in Robots and T cells

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
        July 2015
        1496 pages
        ISBN:9781450334723
        DOI:10.1145/2739480

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 July 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        GECCO '15 Paper Acceptance Rate182of505submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader