skip to main content
10.1145/2750511.2750527acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdhConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-Modal Biological Driver Monitoring via Ubiquitous Wearable Body Sensor Network

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to introduce the design of the next generation driver monitoring platform to be facilitated in the semi-autonomous automotive system infrastructure. In the context of connected vehicles, this work extends current infrastructure to include real-time driver monitoring and feedback. Rather than leaving the driver out of the process, the goal is to obtain a vehicle where the degree of autonomy is continuously changed in real-time as a function of uncertainty ranges for driver biological state and behavior. The evolution and dissemination of mobile technology has created exceptional opportunities for highly detailed and personalized data collection in a far more granular and cost effective way. However, turning this potential into practice requires algorithms and methodologies to transform these raw data into actionable information. We have developed a robust driver monitoring platform consisting of automotive sensors (i.e. OBD-II) that capture the real-time information of the vehicle and driving behavior as well as a heterogeneous wearable body sensor network that collects the driver biometrics (e.g., electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG)). Accurate synchronization and storage of such multi-source heterogeneous data were also developed and validated. Finally, The task of characterizing driver distraction using EEG signals was investigated in two different road conditions as a proof of concept.

References

  1. Trimble, T. E., Bishop, R., Morgan, J. F., & Blanco, M. (2014, July). Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts: Past research, state of automation technology, and emerging system concepts. (Report No. DOT HS 812 043). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pompei, J.F., Taly, S., Buckley, S.J., Kemp, J. (2002) "An automobileintegrated system for assessing and reacting to driver cognitive load." in Proceedings of Convergence, Detroit, Michigan, USA, 411--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, A. Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden, "Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system," in SenSys '06: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2006, pp. 125--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Deffenbacher, J. L., Deffenbacher, D. M., Lynch, R. S., & Richards, T. L. (2003). Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: A comparison of high and low anger drivers. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 701--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. Simonson, C. Baker, N. Burns, C. Keiper, O. H. Schmitt, and S. Stackhouse, "Cardiovascular stress (electrocardiographic changes) produced by driving an automobile," American Heart Journal, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 125--135, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Healey, J.A., Picard, R.W. (2005) "Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (6): 156--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yang, G., Lin, Y., Bhattacharya, P. (2005) "A driver fatigue recognition model using fusion of multiple features." IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, (2):1777--1784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Underwood, G., Chapman, G.P., Wright, S., Crundall, D. (1999) "Anger while driving." Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, (2): 55--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tan, H., Zhang, Y.U.J. (2006) "Detecting eye blink states by tracking iris and eyelids," Pattern Recognition Letters, (27): 667--675. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bittner, R., Smrcka, P., Pavelka, M., Vysok, P., Pousek, L. (2001) "Fatigue indicators of drowsy drivers based on analysis of physiological signals," International Symposium on Medical Data Analysis, 62--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vitaljacket R. (2010) "a wearable ambulatory ecg medical device". Biodevices {Online}. Available: http://www.vitaljacket.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Park, J., Xu, L., Sridhar, V., Chi, M., Cauwenberghs, G., (2011) "Wireless dry EEG for drowsiness detection," Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE , 3298--3301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sun, Y., Yu, X., (2014). An Innovative Nonintrusive Driver Assistance System for Vital Signal Monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 18(6):1932--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. De Santos A., Sánchez-Avila, C., Guerra-Casanova, J., Bailador-Del Pozo, G. (2011) Real-Time Stress Detection by Means of Physiological Signals. Recent Applications in Bioinformatics ISBN 978--953--307--488--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sun F., Kuo C., Cheng H., Buthpitiya S., Collins P., Griss M. (2010) Activity-Aware Mental Stress Detection Using Physiological Sensors. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE); Santa Clara, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee B., Chung, W.Y. (2012) A Smartphone-Based Driver Safety Monitoring System Using Data Fusion. Sensors 2012, (12):17536--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 4565, 2007, pp 294--303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin, C.T., Chen, S.A., Ko, L.W., Wang, U.K. (2011) EEG-based brain dynamics of driving distraction, The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 1497,1500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T. W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., Sejnowski, T. J., (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation, Psychophysiology, ( 37):163--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Modal Biological Driver Monitoring via Ubiquitous Wearable Body Sensor Network

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Lalit P Saxena

      Self-driving cars, or driverless cars, are becoming the future of driving without manual intervention. Currently, the speed of around 25 kilometers per hour (km/h) has been achieved for self-driving cars; however, the research in this direction is progressing to achieve more than 100 km/h. Automatic braking, lane-keeping assistance, and collision warning and avoiding are a few examples of automated systems being installed in cars. The authors present an automatic driver monitoring system to monitor the uncertainty of a driver's biological state and behavior in real time. They developed "a robust driver monitoring platform that consists of automotive on-board diagnostics sensors to capture the real-time information of the vehicle and driving behavior." Further, it contains "a heterogeneous wearable body sensor network that collects the driver's biometrics using electroencephalography, electrocardiogram, electromyography, and Galvanic skin response synchronized to record speed, acceleration, steering, and fuel consumption." The system has many features: it is minimally intrusive, comprehensive, user-friendly, responsive in real time, ubiquitous, and available remotely. For the experiments, the authors employed four drivers on a route comprising a mixture of urban roads and highways in Dearborn, Michigan. The drivers were asked to drive twice, at 11 AM and 6 PM, when there was less traffic and in rush hour, respectively. The system monitored the drivers' behavior while driving and while conversing with passengers, and extracted the drivers' biological state information using data mining, machine learning, and statistical analysis. The authors generalize the results of less-complicated driving environments for automated driving scenarios. They provide insights into having a statistical measure of the biometrics for an easy and safe switching of "control between the driver and the automated vehicle when necessary." Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DH '15: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Health 2015
        May 2015
        156 pages
        ISBN:9781450334921
        DOI:10.1145/2750511

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 May 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader