skip to main content
10.1145/2749246.2749270acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshpdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

HPC System Lifetime Story: Workload Characterization and Evolutionary Analyses on NERSC Systems

Published:15 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

High performance computing centers have traditionally served monolithic MPI applications. However, in recent years, many of the large scientific computations have included high throughput and data-intensive jobs. HPC systems have mostly used batch queue schedulers to schedule these workloads on appropriate resources. There is a need to understand future scheduling scenarios that can support the diverse scientific workloads in HPC centers. In this paper, we analyze the workloads on two systems (Hopper, Carver) at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing (NERSC) Center. Specifically, we present a trend analysis towards understanding the evolution of the workload over the lifetime of the two systems.

References

  1. K. Antypas, B. A. Austin, T. L. Butler, and R. A. Gerber. NERSC workload analysis on Hopper. Technical report, LBNL Report: 6804E, October 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. A. Bauer, A. Biem, S. McIntyre, N. Tamura, and Y. Xie. High-performance parallel and stream processing of x-ray microdiffraction data on multicores. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 341, page 012025. IOP Publishing, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Di, D. Kondo, and W. Cirne. Characterization and comparison of cloud versus grid workloads. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pages 230--238. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. G. Feitelson, L. Rudolph, and U. Schwiegelshohn. Parallel job scheduling, a status report. In Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, pages 1--16. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu, and S. Lu. Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE'08, pages 1--10. Ieee, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Iosup, H. Li, M. Jan, S. Anoep, C. Dumitrescu, L. Wolters, and D. Epema. The grid workloads archive. Future Generation Computer Systems, 24(7):672--686, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. A. Lifka. The ANL/IBM SP scheduling system. In Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, pages 295--303. Springer, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. N. Srirama, P. Jakovits, and E. Vainikko. Adapting scientific computing problems to clouds using MapReduce. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(1):184--192, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Staples. Torque resource manager. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, page 8. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. W.-S. Wei. Time series analysis. Addison-Wesley publ, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HPC System Lifetime Story: Workload Characterization and Evolutionary Analyses on NERSC Systems

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HPDC '15: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing
    June 2015
    296 pages
    ISBN:9781450335508
    DOI:10.1145/2749246

    Copyright © 2015 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 June 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    HPDC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate19of116submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate166of966submissions,17%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader