skip to main content
10.1145/2746285.2746305acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A High Reliability Asymptotic Approach for Packet Inter-Delivery Time Optimization in Cyber-Physical Systems

Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In cyber-physical systems such as automobiles, measurement data from sensor nodes should be delivered to other consumer nodes such as actuators in a regular fashion. But, in practical systems over unreliable media such as wireless, it is a significant challenge to guarantee small enough inter-delivery times for different clients with heterogeneous channel conditions and inter-delivery requirements. In this paper, we design scheduling policies aiming at satisfying the inter-delivery requirements of such clients. We formulate the problem as a risk-sensitive Markov Decision Process (MDP). Although the resulting problem involves an infinite state space, we first prove that there is an equivalent MDP involving only a finite number of states. Then we prove the existence of a stationary optimal policy and establish an algorithm to compute it in a finite number of steps.

However, the bane of this and many similar problems is the resulting complexity, and, in an attempt to make fundamental progress, we further propose a new high reliability asymptotic approach. In essence, this approach considers the scenario when the channel failure probabilities for different clients are of the same order, and asymptotically approach zero. We thus proceed to determine the asymptotically optimal policy: in a two-client scenario, we show that the asymptotically optimal policy is a "modified least time-to-go" policy, which is intuitively appealing and easily implementable; in the general multi-client scenario, we are led to an SN policy, and we develop an algorithm of low computational complexity to obtain it. Simulation results show that the resulting policies perform well even in the pre-asymptotic regime with moderate failure probabilities.

References

  1. E. Altman, V. Kavitha, F. De Pellegrini, V. Kamble, and V. Borkar. Risk sensitive optimal control framework applied to delay tolerant networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, April 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. S. Avestimehr, S. N. Diggavi, and D. N. Tse. Wireless network information flow: A deterministic approach. IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bar-Noy, R. Bhatia, J. S. Naor, and B. Schieber. Minimizing service and operation costs of periodic scheduling. In ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Cavazos-Cadena and E. Fernandez-Gaucherand. Controlled Markov chains with risk-sensitive criteria: Average cost, optimality equations, and optimal solutions. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 49(2), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K.-J. Chung and M. J. Sobel. Discounted MDP';s: Distribution functions and exponential utility maximization. SIAM J. Control Optim., 25(1), 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. ElBatt, C. Saraydar, M. Ames, and T. Talty. Potential for intra-vehicle wireless automotive sensor networks. In IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, March 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W. Fleming and D. Hernandez-Hernandez. Risk sensitive control of finite state machines on an infinite horizon. I. In Decision and Control, IEEE Conference on, Dec 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. X. Guo, R. Singh, P. Kumar, and Z. Niu. Optimal energy-efficient regular delivery of packets in cyber-physical systems. In IEEE ICC, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. X. Guo, S. Zhou, Z. Niu, and P. Kumar. Optimal wake-up mechanism for single base station with sleep mode. In IEEE International Teletraffic Congress, Sept 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I.-H. Hou, V. Borkar, and P. Kumar. A theory of QoS for wireless. In IEEE INFOCOM, April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. A. Howard and J. E. Matheson. Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Manage. Science, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. C. Jaquette. A utility criterion for Markov decision processes. Management Science, 23(1), 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Kittipiyakul, P. Elia, and T. Javidi. High-snr analysis of outage-limited communications with bursty and delay-limited information. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, Feb 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Li, R. Li, and A. Eryilmaz. Heavy-traffic-optimal scheduling with regular service guarantees in wireless networks. In MobiHoc, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Li, A. Eryilmaz, and B. Li. Throughput-optimal wireless scheduling with regulated inter-service times. In IEEE INFOCOM, April 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. I. Marcus, E. Fernandez-Gaucherand, D. Hernandez-Hernandez, S. Coraluppi, and P. Fard. Risk sensitive Markov decision processes. In Systems and control in the 21st century, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Neely, E. Modiano, and C. ping Li. Fairness and optimal stochastic control for heterogeneous networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. L. Puterman. Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1st edition, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rahul Singh, I-Hong Hou and P.R. Kumar. Pathwise performance of debt based policies for wireless networks with hard delay constraints. In IEEE 52nd Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2013, pages 7838--7843, Dec 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahul Singh, I-Hong Hou and P.R. Kumar. Fluctuation analysis of debt based policies for wireless networks with hard delay constraints. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2014, pages 2400--2408, April 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Y. Sadi and S. Ergen. Optimal power control, rate adaptation, and scheduling for uwb-based intravehicular wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Jan 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. Singh, X. Guo, and P. R. Kumar. Index policies for optimal mean-variance trade-off of inter-delivery times in real-time sensor networks. In INFOCOM, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. R. Singh and A. Stolyar. Maxweight scheduling: Asymptotic behavior of unscaled queue-differentials in heavy traffic. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H.-M. Tsai, O. Tonguz, C. Saraydar, T. Talty, M. Ames, and A. MacDonald. Zigbee-based intra-car wireless sensor networks: a case study. IEEE Wireless Communications, December 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Xiong, R. Li, A. Eryilmaz, and E. Ekici. Delay-aware cross-layer design for network utility maximization in multi-hop networks. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Y. Zhang and C. Tepedelenlioglu. Applications of tauberian theorem for high-snr analysis of performance over fading channels. Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on, January 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A High Reliability Asymptotic Approach for Packet Inter-Delivery Time Optimization in Cyber-Physical Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiHoc '15: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing
        June 2015
        436 pages
        ISBN:9781450334891
        DOI:10.1145/2746285

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MobiHoc '15 Paper Acceptance Rate37of250submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      ePub

      View this article in ePub.

      View ePub