Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields

ABSTRACT

Increasing women's participation in computer science is a critical workforce and equity concern. The technology industry has committed to reversing negative trends for women in computer science as well as engineering and information technology "computing" fields. Building on previously published research, this paper identifies factors that influence young women's decisions to pursue computer science-related degrees and the ways in which these factors differ for young men. It is based on a survey of 1,739 high school students and recent college graduates. Results identified encouragement and exposure as the leading factors influencing this critical choice for women, while the influence of these factors is different for men. In particular, the influence of family is found to play a critical role in encouragement and exposure, and outreach efforts should focus on ways to engage parents.

References

1. Anderson, J. A. (1982). Logistic regression. Handbook of Statistics. North-Holland, New York, 169--191. Retrieved from http://www.schatz.sju.edu/multivar/guide/Logistic.pdf
2. Achtenhagen, L., Johansson, A., & Picard, R. (2007). The Promotion of Entrepreneurship in the Audio-Visual Media (esp. TV): Final Report for the European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/av/media_study_en.pdf
3. Barth, J., Todd, B., Goldston, D., & Guadagno, R. (2010). An Integrated Approach to Choosing Technical Careers: Gender Differences in Life Goals for College Students.
4. Benyo, J., & White, J. (2009). New Image for Computing: Report on Market Research. Boston, MA: WGBH Educational Foundation and the Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from http://www.zephoria.org/files/NICReport.pdf
5. Bhanot, R.T. & Jovanovic, J. (2009). The Links Between Parent Behaviors and Boys' and Girls' Science Achievement Beliefs. Applied Developmental Science. Philadelphia, PA. 42--59.
6. Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The Association of Family Influence and Initial Interest in Science. Science Education, 97(3), 395--409.
7. Fan, X. & Chen, M. (2001). Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Retrieved from http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009048817385
8. Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon Experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 79--83. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=543836
9. Fox, M. F., & Firebaugh, G. (1992). Confidence in Science: The Gender Gap. Social Science Quarterly.
10. H. H. Harman. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf
12. Ing, M. (2014). Can Parents Influence Children's Mathematics Achievement and Persistence in STEM Careers?. Journal of Career Development, 41(2), 87--103. Retrieved from http://jcd.sagepub.com/content/41/2/87
13. Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls' and Boys' Developing Interests in Math and Science: Do Parents Matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 5-21.
14. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the Prediction of Academic Performance and Perceived Career Options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 265.
15. Miller, J. D., & Kimmel, L. G. (2012). Pathways to a STEMM Profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(1), 26--45.
16. National Science Foundation. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c0/c0i.htm
17. National Center for Education Statistics (2012). Degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_318.asp
18. O'brien, V., Martinez-Pons, M., & Kopala, M. (1999). Mathematics Self-efficacy, Ethnic Identity, Gender, and Career Interests Related to Mathematics and Science. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(4), 231--235.
19. Page, S. E. (2008). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press.
20. Shashaani, L. (1994). Gender-differences in Computer Experience and Its Influence on Computer Attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research,11(4), 347--367.
21. Sonnert, G. (2009). Parents Who Influence Their Children to Become Scientists: Effects of Gender and Parental Education. Social Studies of Science. 927--941. Retrieved from http://sss.sagepub.com/content/39/6/927
22. Stake, J. E. (2006). The Critical Mediating Role of Social Encouragement for Science Motivation and Confidence Among High School Girls and Boys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 1017--1045.
23. Wilson, B. C. (2002). A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science including Gender Differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1--2), 141--164.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

        • Information science education