Design and Preliminary Results From a Computational Thinking Course

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the design and initial assessment of a general education course in computational thinking for non-computer science majors. The key elements of the course include multidisciplinary cohorts to achieve learning across contexts, multiple languages/tools, including block-based and textual programming languages, repeated exposure to the underlying computational ideas in different forms, and student-defined projects using real world ("big") data to heighten motivation through self-directed contextualized learning. The preliminary multi-methods assessment shows that the course engendered high levels of motivation, achieved key objectives for learning in and across contexts, largely affirmed the choice of languages/tools, and supported, though less strongly than anticipated, the motivational effects of real-world data

References

1. National Research Council, Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking: National Academy Press, 2010.
2. J. M. Wing, "Computational thinking," Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, pp. 33--35, 2006.
3. International Society for Technology Education. 2011, Computational Thinking Teacher Resources (Second Edition ed.). Available: http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/ct-teacher-resources_2ed-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=2
4. L. Perkovik, et al., "A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum," Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
5. N. Senske, "A Curriculum for Integrating Computational Thinking," presented at the ACADIA Regional Conference 2011 Lincoln, Nebraska, 2011.
6. C. Kuster, et al., "Developing Computational Thinking Skills across the Undergraduate Curriculum," presented at the 44th Annual Midwest Instruction and Computing Symposium (MICS'11), Duluth, MN, 2011.
7. S. Hambrusch, et al., "A multidisciplinary approach towards computational thinking for science majors," Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, TN, USA, 2009.
8. D. Kafura and D. Tatar, "Initial experience with a computational thinking course for computer science students," Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Dallas, TX, USA, 2011.
9. A. Ritz, "Evolution of a Computational Thinking Course," Presentation to CS6604 Class, Ed., ed, 2013.
10. H. Qin, "Teaching computational thinking through bioinformatics to biology students," Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, TN, USA, 2009.
11. W. Booth, et al. (2013, Computational Thinking: Building a Model Curriculum. 11pp. Available: https://ciiwiki.ecs.baylor.edu/index.php/Computational_Thinking:_Building_a_Model_Curriculum.
12. T. J. Cortina, "An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation," Proceedings of the 38th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Covington, Kentucky, USA, 2007.
13. T. Li and T. Wang, "A Unified Approach to Teach Computational Thinking for First Year Non-CS Majors in an Introductory Course," IERI Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 498--503, 2012.
14. L. Snyder, Fluency with Information Technology, 6th ed., Addison-Wesley, 2014.
15. M. Guzdial, "A media computation course for non-majors," SIGCSE Bull., vol. 35, pp. 104--108, 2003.
16. M. Guzdial and A. E. Tew, "Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: an instructional design approach for motivating computing education," Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Canterbury, United Kingdom, 2006.
17. R. E. Anderson, et al., "Introductory programming meets the real world: using real problems and data in CS1," Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2014.
18. T. T. Yuen and K. A. Robbins, "A Qualitative Study of Students' Computational Thinking Skills in a Data-Driven Computing Class," Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 14, pp. 1--19, 2014.
19. U. Wilensky, "Modeling Nature's Emergent Patterns with Multi-Agent Languages," in Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, ed. Northwestern University: Available at: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/2013/mnep9.pdf, 2013.
20. A. C. Bart, et al., "Motivating Students with Big Data: CORGIS and MUSIC," in Splash-E, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2014.
21. D. I. Cordova and M. R. Lepper, "Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 88, pp. 715--730, 1996.
22. L. R. Lattuca, et al., "Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 28, pp. 23--48, 2004.
23. P. Dillenbourg, "What do you mean by collaborative learning?," Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches., pp. 1--19, 1999.
24. B. Miller and D. Ranum, "Runestone interactive: tools for creating interactive course materials," Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2014.
25. N. Fraser, "Differential synchronization," Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, Munich, Germany, 2009.
26. Blockly Website. (2014. Available: https://developers.google.com/blockly/
27. B. D. Jones and G. Skaggs, "Validation of the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation Inventory: A measure of students' motivation in college courses," in International Conference on Motivation, Frankfurt, Germany, 2012.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Model curricula