skip to main content
10.5555/2726970.2726981guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article
Free Access

A comparative study of two models for celebrity identification on twitter

Published:17 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The concept of celebrities has shaped societies throughout history. This work addresses the problem of celebrity identification from social media interactions. "Celebritiness" is a characteristic assigned to persons that are initially based on specific achievements or lineage. However, celebritiness often transcends achievements and gets attached to the person itself, causing them to capture popular imagination and create a public image that is bigger than life. The celebrity identification problem is argued to be distinct from similar problems of identifying influencers or of identification of experts. We develop two models for celebrity identification. In this paper, we compare the two models on twitter data and highlight the characteristics of each of the models.

References

  1. N. Agarwal, H. Liu, L. Tang, and P. S. Yu. Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, WSDM '08, pages 207--218, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I. Anger and C. Kittl. Measuring influence on twitter. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, page 31. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Anjerani and A. Moeini. Selecting influential nodes for detected communities in real-world social networks. In Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2011 19th Iranian Conference on, pages 1--6, may 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. J. Boorstin. The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. Vintage, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1):107--117, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In 4th international aaai conference on weblogs and social media (icwsm), volume 14, page 8, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Chen, J. Tang, J. Li, and L. Zhou. Discovering the staring people from social networks. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, WWW '09, pages 1219--1220, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Chen, C. Wang, and Y. Wang. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '10, pages 1029--1038, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '09, pages 199--208, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Deng, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Formal models for expert finding on dblp bibliography data. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM '08, pages 163--172, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Forestier, J. Velcin, A. Stavrianou, and D. Zighed. Extracting celebrities from online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining ASONAM 2012), pages 322--326. IEEE Computer Society, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Forestier, J. Velcin, A. Stavrianou, and D. Zighed. Extracting celebrities from online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining ASONAM 2012), ASONAM '12, pages 322--326, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Friedman and L. Friedman. Endorser effectiveness by product type. Journal of Advertising Research, 19(1):63--71, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Ghosh and K. Lerman. Predicting influential users in online social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.4882, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Goyal, F. Bonchi, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Discovering leaders from community actions. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '08, pages 499--508, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Hajian and T. White. Modelling influence in a social network: Metrics and evaluation. In Privacy, security, risk and trust (passat), 2011 ieee third international conference on and 2011 ieee third international conference on social computing (socialcom), pages 497--500. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Hatcher, G. S. Bawa, and S. Barry de Ville. How you can identify influencers in sas® social media analysis (and why it matters).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. I. Hovland, I. L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press New Haven, CT, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 591--600. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Li, S. Lin, and M. Shan. Finding influential mediators in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pages 75--76. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Z. Luo, M. Osborne, J. Tang, and T. Wang. Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in twitter. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 869--872. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. McCracken. Who is the celebrity endorser? cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer research, pages 310--321, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W. J. McGuire. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. The handbook of social psychology, 3:136--314, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. W. Mills. The power elite {1956}. New York, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H.-K. Peng, J. Zhu, D. Piao, R. Yan, and Y. Zhang. Retweet modeling using conditional random fields. In Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on, pages 336--343. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. S. Srinivasan, S. Srinivasa, and S. Thulasidasan. Exploring celebrity dynamics on twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th IBM Collaborative Academia Research Exchange Workshop, I-CARE '13, pages 13:1--13:4, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. Turner. Understanding Celebrity. SAGE Publications, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Y. Wang, G. Cong, G. Song, and K. Xie. Community-based greedy algorithm for mining top-k influential nodes in mobile social networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1039--1048. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 261--270. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Zeng, W. K. Cheung, C. hung Li, and J. Liu. Coauthor network topic models with application to expert finding. Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on, 1:366--373, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. L. Zhou. Trust based recommendation system with social network analysis. In Information Engineering and Computer Science, 2009. ICIECS 2009. International Conference on, pages 1--4, dec. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader