skip to main content
10.4108/icst.urb-iot.2014.257191acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesurb-iotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Implementing the connected e-bike: challenges and requirements of an IoT application for urban transportation

Published:27 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

As local transportation systems are facing enormous challenges in consequence of extensive urban growth, technological advancements are creating unprecedented opportunities as the Internet is extending into the real world, connecting physical items to the virtual world and creating an Internet of Things (IoT). While many activities are exploring corresponding applications, e.g. connecting bicycles to the Internet, widespread economic success of a truly connected device is still outstanding. Focusing on electric bicycles (e-bikes), this study investigates challenges and requirements of an IoT implementation based on GPS trackers from a technological as well as consumer perspective. The results of a four-month field study suggest a high interest of users in data from a connected e-bike but also indicate that technological restrictions still exist e.g. concerning the completeness of collected data. Also, such limitations appear to become further accentuated in view of high user expectations towards the accuracy and visualization of data, pointing to tradeoffs, which may have to be made in the design of IoT implementations between the completeness and convenience of data collection as well as the energy consumption of a sensor and the attractiveness of use cases to consumers.

References

  1. Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chui, M., Löffler, M., and Roberts, R. 2010. The Internet of Things. McKinsey Quarterly. 34 (1), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, D. J., and Das, S. K. 2007. How smart are our environments? An updated look at the state of the art. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 3 (2), 53--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cummins, C., Orr, R., O'Connor, H., and West, C. 2013. Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Microtechnology Sensors in Team Sports: A Systematic Review. Sport. Med. 43, 1025--1042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dill, J. 2009. Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure. J. Public Health Policy. 30 (s1), S95--S110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleisch, E. 2010. What is the Internet of Things? - An Economic Perspective. Auto-ID Labs White Pap. WP-BIZAPP-053, 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Flüchter, K., Wortmann, F., Fleisch, E. 2014. Digital Commuting: The Effect of Social Normative Feedback on E-bike Commuting - Evidence from a Field Study. In ECIS 2014 Proceedings. (Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hood, J., Sall, E., and Charlton, B. 2011. A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California. Transp. Lett. Int. J. Transp. Res. 3 (1), 63--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Van Hooff, N. 2013. Performance assessment and feedback of fitness exercises using smartphone sensors. Master's thesis. University of Groningen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Intille, S. S., Lester, J., Sallis, J. F., and Duncan, G. 2012. New Horizons in Sensor Development. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44.1 (suppl. 1), 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L., and Rubenstein, D. 2002. Energy-Efficient Computing for Wildlife Tracking: Design Tradeoffs and Early Experiences with ZebraNet. ACM Sigplan Not. 37 (10), 96--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kranz, M., Möller, A., Hammerla, N., Diewald, S., Plötz, T., Olivier, P., and Roalter, L. 2013. The mobile fitness coach: Towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 9 (2), 203--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Krause, J., Krause, S., Arlinghaus, R., Psorakis, I., Roberts, S., and Rutz, C. 2013. Reality mining of animal social systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28 (9), 541--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsey, G., Hankey, S., Wang, X., Gorjestani, A., and Chen, J. 2013. Feasibility of Using GPS to Track Bicycle Lane Positioning. Technical report CTS 13-16. Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, University of Minnesoata.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mattern, F. and Floerkemeier, C. 2010. From the Internet of Computers to the Internet of Things. Informatik-Spektrum. 33 (2), 107--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. 11th ed. Weinheim: Beltz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD. 2012. OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050. OECD Publishing: Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Outram, C., Ratti, C., Biderman, A. 2010. The Copenhagen Wheel: An innovative electric bicycle system that harnesses the power of real-time information and crowd sourcing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies. (Monaco, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Randers, M. B., Mujika, I., Hewitt, A., Santisteban, J., Bischoff, R., Solano, R., Zubillaga, A., Peltola, E., Krustrup, P., and Mohr, M. 2010. Application of four different football match analysis systems: A comparative study. J. Sports Sci. 28 (2), 171--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sommerville, I., and Kotonya, G. 1998. Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. UNEP. 2010. Share the Road: Investment in Walking and Cycling Road Infrastructure. UNEP: Nairobi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. von Watzdorf, S., and Michahelles, F. 2010. Accuracy of positioning data on smartphones. In LocWeb 2010 Proceedings (Tokyo, Japan, November 29, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. ZIV. 2014. Pressemitteilung zum E-Bike Markt 2013. Zweirad-Industrie-Verband: Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Implementing the connected e-bike: challenges and requirements of an IoT application for urban transportation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      URB-IOT '14: Proceedings of the First International Conference on IoT in Urban Space
      October 2014
      117 pages
      ISBN:9781631900372

      Publisher

      ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

      Brussels, Belgium

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader