Murray Wood
Andrew Brooks
- 1.Victor R. Basili and Richard W. Selby. Comparing the effectiveness of software testing strategies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE13(12):1278- 1296, December 1987. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.A. Brooks, J. Daly, J. Miller, M. Roper, and M. Wood. Replication of cxperimental results in software engineering. Research report EFoCS-17-94, Department of Computer Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.N. Fenton, S. Pfleeger, and R. Glass. Science and substance: A challenge to software engineers. IEEE Software, 11(4):86-95, July 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.R. Glass. The software research crisis. IEEE Software, 11(6):42-47, November 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.klliam C. Hetzel. An Experimental Analysis of Program Verification Methods. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1976. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.C. Jones. Gaps in the object-oriented paradigm. IEEE Computer, 27(6):90-91, June 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Erilc Kamsties and Christopher Lott. An empirical evaluation of three defect detection techniques. Technical Report ISERN 95-02, Dept. Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, May 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.Erilc Kamsties and Christopher Lott. An empirical evaluation of three defect detection techniques. In Proc. 5th European Software Engineering Conference, September 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Richard C. Linger, Harlan D. Mills, and B.I. Witt. Structured Programming: Theerg and Practice. Addison-Wesley; 1979. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Steve McConnell. Code Complete. Microsoft Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.Glenford J. Myers. A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections. Communications of the ACM, 21(9):760-768, September 1978, Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Roger S. Pressman. Software Engineering - A Practitioners Approach. McGraw- Hill, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Marc Roper. Software Testing. McGraw-Hill, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.R. W. Selby. Combining software testing strategies: An empirical evaluation. In Proc. Workshop on Software Testing, pages 82-91. IEEE Computer Society Press, July 1986.Google Scholar
- 15.B. J. Wirier, Statistical Principles in Ezperimental Design. McGraw-Hill, 2nd edition, 1971.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Comparing and combining software defect detection techniques: a replicated empirical study
Recommendations
Comparing the Effectiveness of Software Testing Strategies
This study applies an experimentation methodology to compare three state-of-the-practice software testing techniques: a) code reading by stepwise abstraction, b) functional testing using equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis, and c) ...
An empirical evaluation of defect detection techniques
This report describes an empirical study comparing three defect detection techniques: (a) code reading by stepwise abstraction, (b) functional testing using equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis, and (c) structural testing using branch ...
Comments