skip to main content
10.1145/2686612.2686624acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An internet of social things

Published:02 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things is a vision for a world of interconnected smart devices. We present an alternative vision based on a review of literature that emphasizes the importance and role of objects in social relations. We situate this work in relation to a conceptual understanding of objects and sociality, and note some methodological implications of a more object-centred sociality that may suggest design opportunities alongside the emerging Internet of Things.

References

  1. Ashton, K. That 'internet of things' thing. RFiD Journal, 22 (2009), 97--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthel, R., Mackley, K. L., Hudson-Smith A., Karpovich, A., de Jode, M., and Speed, C. An internet of old things as an augmented memory system. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17 (2013), 321--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bell, G., Blythe, M., Gaver, B., Sengers, P., and Wright, P. Designing culturally situated technologies for the home. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003. ACM Press (2003), 1062--1063. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Binder, T., De Michelis, G, Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., and Wagner, I. What is the object of design? Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blythe, M., and Monk, A. Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology. Proc. Designing interactive systems. ACM Press (2002), 277--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brereton, M. Designing from Somewhere: A located, relational and transformative view of design. In J. Löwgren, L. Malmborg, and T. Binder (Eds). (Re-) searching a digital Bauhaus. London: Springer-Verlag (2009), 99--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brereton, M. Habituated objects: Everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman. Interactions July/August (2013), 20--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brereton, M., and McGarry, B. An observational study of how objects support engineering design thinking and communication: implications for the design of tangible media. Proc. SIGCHI. ACM Press (2000), 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brown, B. Thing Theory. Critical Inquiry 28, 1 (2001), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Callon, M. Some Elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? Routledge (1986), 196--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chi, P. Y. P., Chen, J. H., Liu, S. Y., and Chu, H. H. Designing smart living objects--enhancing vs. distracting traditional human--object interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques (2007), 788--797. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Davis, H, Nansen, B, Vetere, F, Robertson, T, Brereton, M, Durick, J, and Vaisutis, K. Homemade cookbooks: A recipe for sharing. Proc. DIS 2014, ACM Press (2014), 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dourish, P., and Mazmanian, M. Media as material: Information representations as material foundations for organizational practice. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley and H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford University Press (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehn, P. Participation in Design Things. Proc. Participatory Design Conference. ACM Press (2008) 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Engeström, J. (2008) Social Objects: What Beach balls and Potatoes Can Teach Us about Social Networks. Slideshare. http://www.slideshare.net/rashmi/jyriengestrom-social-objects (retrieved July 1, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fallman, D. The new good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. Proc. CHI 2011. ACM Press (2011), 1051--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S. and Villar, N. The history tablecloth: illuminating domestic activity. Proc. DIS 2006. ACM Press (2006), 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Greenfield, A. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders Publishing (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grimes, A. and Harper, R. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harman, G. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. re.press (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. 1971. The Thing, in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. A. Hofstadter. Perennial (1971), 174--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalanithi, J. J. and Bove, V. M. Connectibles: Tangible social networks. Proc. TEI 2008. ACM Press (2008), 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Knorr-Cetina, K. Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14, 4, (1997), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, B. From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik. How to Make Things Public. An Introduction, in Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, B. Latour and P. Weibel, Eds. MIT Press (2005), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinussen, E. S. and Arnall, T. Designing with RFID. Proc. TEI 2009. ACM Press (2009), 343--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Leong, T., Vetere, F., and Howard, S. Randomness as a resource for design. In Proc. DIS 2006, ACM Press (2006), 132--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Miller, D. Stuff. London: Polity (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mugellini, E., Rubegni, E., Gerardi, S. and Khaled, O. A. Using personal objects as tangible interfaces for memory recollection and sharing. Proc. TEI 2007. ACM Press (2007), 231--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nansen, B, Arnold, M, Gibbs, M, and Davis, H. Dwelling with Media Stuff: Latencies of Materiality in Four Australian Homes. Environment and Planning D, 29, 4 (2011), 693--715.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Odom, W. and Pierce, J., Improving with age: designing enduring interactive products. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009. ACM Press (2009), 3793--3798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Orr, J. Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: ILR Press (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pandey, Sumit, and Srivastava, S. Keynect: tangible social network. Proc. Creativity and Innovation in Design. ACM (2011), 347--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Robertson, T., Kan, M., Sadler, K, and Hagen, P., Uncovering traces of mobile practices: 'the bag study'. Proc. OzCHI 2005. ACM Press (2005), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Robles, E., and Wiberg, M. Texturing the "material turn" in interaction design. Proc. TEI 2010. ACM Press (2010), 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rosner, D., Blanchette, J., Buechley, L., Dourish, P., Mazmanian, M. From Materials to Materiality: Connecting Practice and Theory in HCI. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012), 2787--2790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Suchman, L. Human--machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Turkle, S. (Ed.) Evocative objects: Things we think with. MIT Press, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Vaisutis, K, Brereton, M., Robertson, T., Vetere, F., Durick, J. Nansen, B., and Buys, L. Invisible connections: Investigating older people's emotions and social relations around objects. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014. AC Press (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Venkatesh, A. Digital Home Technologies and Transformation of Households. Information Systems Frontiers, 10 (2008), 391--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wiberg, M. Methodology for materiality: interaction design research through a material lens. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18 (2014), 635--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wiberg, M. and Robles, E. Computational compositions: aesthetics, materials, and interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4, 2 (2010), 65--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An internet of social things

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design
      December 2014
      689 pages
      ISBN:9781450306539
      DOI:10.1145/2686612
      • Conference Chair:
      • Tuck Leong

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 December 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate85of176submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader